• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索长新冠中的隐形和认知不公正:一项在线新冠社区中患者故事的公民科学定性分析。

Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community.

机构信息

Centre for Psyhcological Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1753-1765. doi: 10.1111/hex.13518. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13518
PMID:35557480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327841/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2020, the long-lasting effects of the Covid-19 virus were not included in public messages of risks to public health. Long Covid emerged as a novel and enigmatic illness with a serious and life-changing impact. Long Covid is poorly explained by objective medical tests, leading to widespread disbelief and stigma associated with the condition. The aim of this organic research is to explore the physical and epistemic challenges of living with Long Covid.

METHODS

Unlike any previous pandemic in history, online Covid communities and 'citizen science' have played a leading role in advancing our understanding of Long Covid. As patient-led research of this grassroots Covid community, a team approach to thematic analysis was undertaken of 66 patient stories submitted online to covid19-recovery.org at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic between April and September 2020.

RESULTS

The overriding theme of the analysis highlights the complexities and challenges of living with Long Covid. Our distinct themes were identified: the life-changing impact of the condition, the importance of validation and how, for many, seeking alternatives was felt to be their only option.

CONCLUSIONS

Long Covid does not easily fit into the dominant evidence-based practice and the biomedical model of health, which rely on objective indicators of the disease process. Patient testimonies are vital to understanding and treating Long Covid, yet patients are frequently disbelieved, and their testimonies are not taken seriously leading to stigma and epistemic injustice, which introduces a lack of trust into the therapeutic relationship.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

The research was undertaken in partnership with our consumer representative(s) and all findings and subsequent recommendations have been coproduced.

摘要

背景

2020 年,新冠病毒的长期影响并未包含在公共卫生风险信息中。长新冠作为一种新颖而神秘的疾病出现,对人们的生活产生了严重且改变人生的影响。长新冠无法通过客观的医学测试来解释,导致人们对此病普遍持怀疑和污名化的态度。本有机研究旨在探索与长新冠共存所带来的身体和认知挑战。

方法

与历史上任何一次大流行不同,在线新冠社区和“公民科学”在深入了解长新冠方面发挥了主导作用。作为该草根新冠社区的患者主导型研究,我们采用团队方法对 2020 年 4 月至 9 月新冠大流行期间,66 名患者在 covid19-recovery.org 网站上在线提交的故事进行了主题分析。

结果

分析的首要主题突出了与长新冠共存的复杂性和挑战。我们确定了以下独特的主题:这种疾病对生活的改变性影响、验证的重要性,以及对许多人来说,寻求替代方案是他们唯一的选择。

结论

长新冠不易纳入主导的循证实践和生物医学健康模式,因为这些模式依赖于疾病过程的客观指标。患者的亲身经历对于理解和治疗长新冠至关重要,但患者经常被怀疑,他们的经历不被认真对待,导致污名化和认知不公正,从而在治疗关系中引入了缺乏信任的因素。

患者贡献

这项研究是与我们的消费者代表合作进行的,所有的发现和后续建议都是共同制定的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/2e00e30a51ec/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/4059e042f63f/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/1085252aa822/HEX-25--g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/ac49b60e4c15/HEX-25--g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/c0474df6e54d/HEX-25--g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/92f945850cb3/HEX-25--g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/cef184fcea97/HEX-25--g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/2e00e30a51ec/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/4059e042f63f/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/1085252aa822/HEX-25--g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/ac49b60e4c15/HEX-25--g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/c0474df6e54d/HEX-25--g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/92f945850cb3/HEX-25--g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/cef184fcea97/HEX-25--g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89a1/9327841/2e00e30a51ec/HEX-25--g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community.探索长新冠中的隐形和认知不公正:一项在线新冠社区中患者故事的公民科学定性分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1753-1765. doi: 10.1111/hex.13518. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Barriers to healthcare access and experiences of stigma: Findings from a coproduced Long Covid case-finding study.医疗保健获取障碍和污名化体验:一项共同开展的长新冠病例发现研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14037. doi: 10.1111/hex.14037.
3
Return-to-work, disabilities and occupational health in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的重返工作岗位、残疾与职业健康。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):408-409. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3960. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Social Distance in COVID-19: Drawing the line between protective behavior and stigma manifestation.新冠疫情期间的社交距离:在保护行为和污名表现之间划清界限。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Sep 20;32(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.025. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
5
Long COVID Citizen Scientists: Developing a Needs-Based Research Agenda by Persons Affected by Long COVID.长新冠公民科学家:受长新冠影响人群制定基于需求的研究议程。
Patient. 2022 Sep;15(5):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00579-7. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
6
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.探究慢性疼痛中的信任、专业知识与认知不公正
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
Exploring Online Peer Support Groups for Adults Experiencing Long COVID in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Interview Study.探索英国经历长新冠的成年人的在线同伴支持小组:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 20;24(5):e37674. doi: 10.2196/37674.
8
"Like before, but not exactly": the Qualy-REACT qualitative inquiry into the lived experience of long COVID.“和之前一样,但又不完全一样”:Qualy-REACT 对长新冠患者生活体验的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13035-w.
9
Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Online Versions of Highly Circulated U.S. Daily Newspapers.美国高发行量日报网络版对新冠疫情的报道
J Community Health. 2020 Dec;45(6):1089-1097. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00913-w.
10
The contested meaning of "long COVID" - Patients, doctors, and the politics of subjective evidence.“长新冠”的争议含义——患者、医生和主观证据的政治。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114619. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114619. Epub 2021 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the influence of lived-experience experts on healthcare providers in a virtual community of practice: a qualitative study.评估生活经验专家对虚拟实践社区中医疗服务提供者的影响:一项定性研究。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 27;5:1562651. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1562651. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
Codeveloping a Novel Intervention for People With Post-COVID Condition: The Balance-ACT Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The teachings of Long COVID.长期新冠的相关知识
Commun Med (Lond). 2021 Jul 12;1:15. doi: 10.1038/s43856-021-00016-0. eCollection 2021.
2
Lessons from Long COVID: working with patients to design better research.长新冠的启示:与患者合作设计更好的研究。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2022 Apr;22(4):201-202. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00692-6.
3
'I can't cope with multiple inputs': a qualitative study of the lived experience of 'brain fog' after COVID-19.“我无法应对多种输入信息”:一项关于新冠病毒感染后“脑雾”生活体验的定性研究
共同开发一种针对新冠后状况患者的新型干预措施:平衡-ACT研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70320. doi: 10.1111/hex.70320.
4
"I'm in Hell …": Experiences of Unmet Health Care Needs Among People with Pre-Existing Disability and Long COVID.“我身处地狱……”:残疾老人和新冠长期症状患者未满足的医疗需求体验
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2025;36(2):572-589. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2025.a959114.
5
Personalisation at the Core of Success: Process Evaluation of the LISTEN Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Personalised Self-Management Support Intervention for People Living With Long Covid.个性化是成功的核心:对 LISTEN 随机对照试验的过程评估,该试验评估了针对长新冠患者的个性化自我管理支持干预措施。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70270. doi: 10.1111/hex.70270.
6
Menopause apps: Personal health tracking, empowerment and epistemic injustice.更年期应用程序:个人健康追踪、赋权与认知不公。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 27;11:20552076251330782. doi: 10.1177/20552076251330782. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
A qualitative analysis of lived experiences, mental health treatment needs, and psychotherapeutic applications among veterans with long COVID.对患有长期新冠的退伍军人的生活经历、心理健康治疗需求和心理治疗应用的定性分析。
Psychol Serv. 2024 Dec 30. doi: 10.1037/ser0000925.
8
'We Don't Have to Prove to People How We're Feeling': Understanding the Role of Peer Support Groups in Countering Epistemic Injustices in Long COVID at a US Centre.“我们不必向他人证明自己的感受”:在美国一个中心理解同伴支持小组在对抗长期新冠认知不公正方面的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70266. doi: 10.1111/hex.70266.
9
Rethinking 'Recovery': A Comparative Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Intensive Care With COVID and Long Covid in the United Kingdom.重新思考“康复”:对英国新冠肺炎及新冠长期症状患者重症监护经历的比较性定性分析
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70253. doi: 10.1111/hex.70253.
10
Health and social service provider perspectives on challenges, approaches, and recommendations for treating long COVID: a qualitative study of Canadian provider experiences.健康与社会服务提供者对治疗长期新冠的挑战、方法及建议的看法:对加拿大提供者经历的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12590-3.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e056366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056366.
4
Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK-wide survey.新冠病毒感染后患者的症状和体验:一项全英范围调查的结果。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Nov;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001075.
5
Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management.长新冠的发病机制、危险因素和管理。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 26;374:n1648. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1648.
6
'Reluctant pioneer': A qualitative study of doctors' experiences as patients with long COVID.“不情愿的先驱者”:一项关于医生作为长新冠患者的体验的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):833-842. doi: 10.1111/hex.13223. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Citizen science in the time of COVID-19.新冠疫情时期的公民科学。
Thorax. 2021 Jul;76(7):636-637. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216673. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Developing services for long COVID: lessons from a study of wounded healers.为长新冠患者提供服务:一项创伤疗愈者研究的启示。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Jan;21(1):59-65. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0962.
9
Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 "long Covid" patients and draft quality principles for services.新冠后持续症状:114 例“长新冠”患者的定性研究和服务质量原则草案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 20;20(1):1144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y.
10
The Behavioural Display of Compassion in Radiation Therapy: Purpose, Meaning and Interpretation.放疗中的同情行为表现:目的、意义与诠释。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Dec;51(4S):S59-S71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Nov 13.