Suppr超能文献

三叉神经电刺激可改善健康个体的嗅觉:一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验。

Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve improves olfaction in healthy individuals: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):761-768. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both activated by environmental odorants, there is a clear role for the intranasal trigeminal and olfactory nerves in smell function. Unfortunately, our ability to perceive odorants decreases with age or with injury, and limited interventions are available to treat smell loss.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve via trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates odor sensitivity in healthy individuals.

METHODS

We recruited 20 healthy adults (12 Female, mean age = 27) to participate in this three-visit, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive one of three stimulation modalities (TNS, tDCS, or sham) during each of their visits. Odor detection thresholds were obtained at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 30-min post-intervention. Furthermore, participants were asked to complete a sustained attention task and mood assessments before odor detection testing.

RESULTS

Findings reveal a timeXcondition interaction for guaiacol (GUA) odorant detection thresholds (F (3.188, 60.57) = 3.833, P = 0.0125), but not phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA) odorant thresholds. At 30-min post-stimulation, both active TNS and active tDCS showed significantly increased sensitivity to GUA compared to sham TNS (Sham TNS = -8.30% vs. Active TNS = 9.11%, mean difference 17.43%, 95% CI 5.674 to 29.18, p = 0.0044; Sham TNS = -8.30% vs. Active tDCS = 13.58%, mean difference 21.89%, 95% CI 10.47 to 33.32, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

TNS is a safe, simple, noninvasive method for boosting olfaction. Future studies should investigate the use of TNS on smell function across different stimulation parameters, odorants, and patient populations.

摘要

背景

鼻腔内的三叉神经和嗅觉神经都能被环境气味激活,在嗅觉功能中起着明显的作用。不幸的是,我们感知气味的能力会随着年龄的增长或损伤而下降,而且可用的治疗嗅觉丧失的干预措施有限。

目的

我们研究了通过三叉神经刺激(TNS)或经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)刺激三叉神经是否能调节健康个体的嗅觉敏感性。

方法

我们招募了 20 名健康成年人(12 名女性,平均年龄 27 岁)参与这项三访、随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验。参与者在每次就诊时被随机分配接受三种刺激模式之一(TNS、tDCS 或假刺激)。在基线、干预后即刻和干预后 30 分钟时获得气味检测阈值。此外,在进行气味检测测试之前,参与者还需要完成一项持续注意力任务和情绪评估。

结果

研究结果显示,愈创木酚(GUA)气味检测阈值存在时间×条件的交互作用(F(3.188,60.57)=3.833,P=0.0125),但苯乙醇(PEA)气味阈值则没有。在刺激后 30 分钟时,与假刺激 TNS 相比,TNS 和 tDCS 的活性均显著增加了对 GUA 的敏感性(假刺激 TNS=-8.30%,TNS 活性=9.11%,平均差异 17.43%,95%CI 5.674 至 29.18,p=0.0044;假刺激 TNS=-8.30%,tDCS 活性=13.58%,平均差异 21.89%,95%CI 10.47 至 33.32,p=0.0004)。

结论

TNS 是一种安全、简单、非侵入性的增强嗅觉的方法。未来的研究应探讨使用不同的刺激参数、气味和患者群体的 TNS 对嗅觉功能的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03da/9976566/27a2e1254795/nihms-1872680-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验