• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在首次住院前,预测心力衰竭患者或有心力衰竭风险患者的住院和死亡:一项回顾性模型开发和外部验证研究。

Predicting hospitalisation for heart failure and death in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure before first hospitalisation: a retrospective model development and external validation study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; BHF Manchester Centre for Heart & Lung Magnetic Resonance Research, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e445-e454. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00045-0. Epub 2022 May 10.

DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00045-0
PMID:35562273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9130210/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying people who are at risk of being admitted to hospital (hospitalised) for heart failure and death, and particularly those who have not previously been hospitalised for heart failure, is a priority. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model involving contemporary deep phenotyping that can be used to generate individual risk estimates of hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure, but who have not previously been hospitalised for heart failure.

METHODS

Between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018, 3019 consecutive adult patients (aged ≥16 years) undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK, were prospectively recruited into a model development cohort. Candidate predictor variables were selected according to clinical practice and literature review. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to develop a prognostic model. The final model was validated in an external cohort of 1242 consecutive adult patients undergoing CMR at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, between June 1, 2010, and March 25, 2016. Exclusion criteria for both cohorts included previous hospitalisation for heart failure. Our study outcome was a composite of first hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality after CMR. Model performance was evaluated in both cohorts by discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration (assessed graphically).

FINDINGS

Median follow-up durations were 1118 days (IQR 950-1324) for the development cohort and 2117 days (1685-2446) for the validation cohort. The composite outcome occurred in 225 (7·5%) of 3019 patients in the development cohort and in 219 (17·6%) of 1242 patients in the validation cohort. The final, externally validated, parsimonious, multivariable model comprised the predictors: age, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and the CMR variables, global longitudinal strain, myocardial infarction, and myocardial extracellular volume. The median optimism-adjusted C-index for the externally validated model across 20 imputed model development datasets was 0·805 (95% CI 0·793-0·829) in the development cohort and 0·793 (0·766-0·820) in the external validation cohort. Model calibration was excellent across the full risk profile. A risk calculator that provides an estimated risk of hospitalisation for heart failure or all-cause mortality at 3 years after CMR for individual patients was generated.

INTERPRETATION

We developed and externally validated a risk prediction model that provides accurate, individualised estimates of the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and all-cause mortality in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure, before first hospitalisation. It could be used to direct intensified therapy and closer follow-up to those at increased risk.

FUNDING

The UK National Institute for Health Research, Guerbet Laboratories, and Roche Diagnostics International.

摘要

背景

识别有住院(住院)心力衰竭和死亡风险的人,特别是那些以前没有因心力衰竭住院的人,是当务之急。我们旨在开发和外部验证一个涉及当代深度表型的预后模型,该模型可用于生成心力衰竭或全因死亡率的个体风险估计,适用于有或有心力衰竭风险但以前未因心力衰竭住院的患者。

方法

2016 年 6 月 1 日至 2018 年 5 月 31 日,英国曼彻斯特大学国民保健署信托基金的 3019 名连续成年患者(年龄≥16 岁)前瞻性入组模型开发队列,进行心脏磁共振(CMR)检查。候选预测变量根据临床实践和文献综述进行选择。使用 Cox 比例风险模型建立预后模型。在匹兹堡大学医学中心心血管磁共振中心的 1242 名连续成年患者的外部队列中(2010 年 6 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 25 日)验证了最终模型。两个队列的排除标准均为以前因心力衰竭住院。我们的研究结果是 CMR 后首次因心力衰竭或全因死亡的复合结果。在两个队列中,通过区分度(Harrell 的 C 指数)和校准(图形评估)来评估模型性能。

结果

开发队列的中位随访时间为 1118 天(IQR 950-1324),验证队列为 2117 天(1685-2446)。在开发队列的 3019 名患者中,有 225 名(7.5%)发生了复合结局,在验证队列的 1242 名患者中,有 219 名(17.6%)发生了复合结局。最终的、外部验证的、简洁的多变量模型包括预测因子:年龄、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、N 端脑钠肽前体和 CMR 变量,包括整体纵向应变、心肌梗死和心肌细胞外体积。在 20 个模型开发数据集的 20 次迭代中,外部验证模型的中位数校正后的 C 指数在开发队列中为 0.805(95%CI 0.793-0.829),在外部验证队列中为 0.793(0.766-0.820)。整个风险谱的校准都非常出色。为患者提供了一种风险计算器,可在 CMR 后 3 年内估计心力衰竭住院和全因死亡率的个体风险。

解释

我们开发并外部验证了一个风险预测模型,该模型可为心力衰竭或心力衰竭风险患者提供准确的个体化住院风险和全因死亡率估计,在首次住院前。它可以用于指导那些风险增加的患者进行强化治疗和更密切的随访。

资金

英国国家卫生研究院、古莱特实验室和罗氏诊断国际公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/549436750788/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/4d4eae17d591/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/f3b72b9d5c1e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/549436750788/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/4d4eae17d591/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/f3b72b9d5c1e/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ef2/9130210/549436750788/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting hospitalisation for heart failure and death in patients with, or at risk of, heart failure before first hospitalisation: a retrospective model development and external validation study.在首次住院前,预测心力衰竭患者或有心力衰竭风险患者的住院和死亡:一项回顾性模型开发和外部验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jun;4(6):e445-e454. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00045-0. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
Validated Model for Prediction of Adverse Cardiac Outcome in Patients With Fabry Disease.用于预测法布里病患者不良心脏结局的验证模型。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 6;80(10):982-994. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.022.
3
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.预测肺癌未来风险:CanPredict(肺部)模型在 1967 万人中的开发、内部和外部验证以及该模型与其他七个风险预测模型的性能评估。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00050-4. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Development and validation of an artificial neural network algorithm to predict mortality and admission to hospital for heart failure after myocardial infarction: a nationwide population-based study.开发和验证一种用于预测心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者死亡率和住院的人工神经网络算法:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Jan;4(1):e37-e45. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00228-4.
5
Contemporary epidemiology of hospitalised heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction in England: a retrospective, cohort study of whole-population electronic health records.英国射血分数降低型与射血分数保留型心力衰竭的当代住院流行病学:基于全人群电子健康记录的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 Nov;9(11):e871-e885. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00215-9.
6
Mortality and life-years lost following subsequent physical comorbidity in people with pre-existing substance use disorders: a national registry-based retrospective cohort study of hospitalised individuals in Czechia.在捷克住院患者中,有先前物质使用障碍的人随后出现身体合并症后的死亡率和生命年损失:一项基于国家登记的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;9(12):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00335-2. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Prognostic Value of Pulmonary Transit Time by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance on Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.心脏磁共振肺通过时间对射血分数降低的晚期心力衰竭患者死亡率和心力衰竭住院的预后价值。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):e011680. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011680. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
Clinical utility of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for risk stratification of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Derivation and validation of the ADHF/NT-proBNP risk score.N末端B型利钠肽原在急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者风险分层中的临床应用。急性失代偿性心力衰竭/NT-proBNP风险评分的推导与验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
10
Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.用于识别急性踝关节扭伤患者不良结局风险的预测模型:SPRAINED 研究的开发和外部验证。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(64):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22640.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of Imaging-Free Myocardial Fibrosis Prediction Models, Association with Outcomes, and Sample Size Estimation for Phase 3 Trials.无影像学心肌纤维化预测模型的开发与验证、与预后的关联以及3期试验的样本量估计
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):e037254. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037254. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Predicting appropriateness of antibiotic treatment among ICU patients with hospital-acquired infection.预测重症监护病房医院获得性感染患者抗生素治疗的适宜性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 6;8(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01426-9.
3
Exploring Mortality and Prognostic Factors of Heart Failure with In-Hospital and Emergency Patients by Electronic Medical Records: A Machine Learning Approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in 30-day readmissions following hospitalisation for heart failure by sex, socioeconomic status and ethnicity.按性别、社会经济地位和种族划分的心力衰竭住院后30天再入院趋势。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jul 14;38:101008. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101008. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.SCMR 立场文件(2020 年):心血管磁共振的临床适应证。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Nov 9;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00682-4.
3
Extracellular Volume and Global Longitudinal Strain Both Associate With Outcomes But Correlate Minimally.
利用电子病历探索住院及急诊心力衰竭患者的死亡率和预后因素:一种机器学习方法
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jan 9;18:77-93. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S488159. eCollection 2025.
4
Multimodal deep learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients using longitudinal chest X-rays and electronic health records.使用纵向胸部X光片和电子健康记录的多模态深度学习预测心力衰竭患者的院内死亡率
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar;41(3):427-440. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03322-z. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
5
Early detection of heart failure using in-patient longitudinal electronic health records.利用住院纵向电子健康记录早期检测心力衰竭
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 18;19(12):e0314145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314145. eCollection 2024.
6
Artificial intelligence based real-time prediction of imminent heart failure hospitalisation in patients undergoing non-invasive telemedicine.基于人工智能对接受非侵入性远程医疗的患者即将发生心力衰竭住院情况的实时预测。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 20;11:1457995. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1457995. eCollection 2024.
7
Remote myocardial fibrosis predicts adverse outcome in patients with myocardial infarction on clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.在临床心血管磁共振成像中,远程心肌纤维化可预测心肌梗死患者的不良预后。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101064. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101064. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
External Validation and Update of the Risk Prediction Model for Denosumab-Induced Hypocalcemia Developed From a Hospital-Based Administrative Database.基于医院管理数据库建立的地舒单抗致低钙血症风险预测模型的外部验证与更新。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Jul;8:e2400078. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00078.
9
Impact of telemedical management on hospitalization and mortality in heart failure patients with diabetes: a post-hoc subgroup analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial.远程医疗管理对合并糖尿病的心力衰竭患者住院率和死亡率的影响:TIM-HF2试验的事后亚组分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jun 12;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02285-0.
10
Prediction of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations and mortality using the echocardiographic Killip score.利用超声心动图Killip评分预测复发性心力衰竭住院和死亡率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 May;114(5):609-615. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02473-8. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
细胞外液容量与整体纵向应变均与结局相关,但相关性极小。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Nov;13(11):2343-2354. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
Graphical calibration curves and the integrated calibration index (ICI) for survival models.生存模型的图形校准曲线和综合校准指数(ICI)
Stat Med. 2020 Sep 20;39(21):2714-2742. doi: 10.1002/sim.8570. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing.心血管磁共振标准化图像解读和后处理 - 2020 年更新:心血管磁共振学会(SCMR):标准化后处理董事会信托基金工作组。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Mar 12;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6.
6
Post-discharge prognosis of patients admitted to hospital for heart failure by world region, and national level of income and income disparity (REPORT-HF): a cohort study.按世界地区、收入水平和收入差距划分的因心力衰竭住院患者出院后的预后(REPORT-HF):一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e411-e422. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30004-8.
7
10-Year Risk Equations for Incident Heart Failure in the General Population.一般人群中心力衰竭事件的 10 年风险方程。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 21;73(19):2388-2397. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.057.
8
Rebutting Existing Misconceptions About Multiple Imputation as a Method for Handling Missing Data.反驳关于多重插补作为处理缺失数据方法的现有误解。
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):297-308. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).临床推荐意见:心血管磁共振 T1、T2、T2* 和细胞外容积mapping:心血管磁共振学会(SCMR)的共识声明,得到欧洲心血管影像协会(EACVI)的认可。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0389-8.
10
Validity of Cardiovascular Disease Event Ascertainment Using Linkage to UK Hospital Records.利用与英国医院记录的关联来确定心血管疾病事件的有效性。
Epidemiology. 2017 Sep;28(5):735-739. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000688.