Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095184.
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic caused a surge in online tools commonly known as symptom checkers. The purpose of these symptom checkers was mostly to reduce the health system burden by providing worried people with testing criteria, where to test and how to self-care. Technical, usability and organizational challenges with regard to online forward triage tools have also been reported. Very few of these online forward triage tools have been evaluated. Evidence for decision frameworks may be of particular value in a pandemic setting where time frames are restricted, uncertainties are ubiquitous and the evidence base is changing rapidly. The objective was to develop a framework to evaluate the utility of COVID-19 online forward triage tools. The development of the online forward triage tool utility framework was conducted in three phases. The process was guided by the socio-ecological framework for adherence that states that patient (individual), societal and broader structural factors affect adherence to the tool. In a further step, pragmatic incorporation of themes on the utility of online forward triage tools that emerged from our study as well as from the literature was performed. Seven criteria emerged; tool accessibility, reliability as an information source, medical decision-making aid, allaying fear and anxiety, health system burden reduction, onward forward transmission reduction and systems thinking (usefulness in capacity building, planning and resource allocation, e.g., tests and personal protective equipment). This framework is intended to be a starting point and a generic tool that can be adapted to other online forward triage tools beyond COVID-19. A COVID-19 online forward triage tool meeting all seven criteria can be regarded as fit for purpose. How useful an OFTT is depends on its context and purpose.
SARS-CoV-2 大流行导致了通常被称为症状检查器的在线工具的激增。这些症状检查器的目的主要是通过提供测试标准、去哪里测试以及如何自我护理,来减轻医疗系统的负担。此外,还报道了在线分诊工具在技术、可用性和组织方面的挑战。这些在线分诊工具中很少有得到评估。在时间有限、不确定性普遍存在且证据基础迅速变化的大流行环境下,决策框架的证据可能特别有价值。本研究的目的是开发一个评估 COVID-19 在线分诊工具效用的框架。在线分诊工具效用框架的开发分三个阶段进行。该过程遵循社会生态学框架,该框架指出患者(个体)、社会和更广泛的结构因素会影响对工具的依从性。在进一步的步骤中,实用地纳入了我们的研究以及文献中出现的关于在线分诊工具效用的主题。出现了七个标准:工具可访问性、作为信息来源的可靠性、医疗决策辅助、缓解恐惧和焦虑、减少卫生系统负担、减少进一步传播以及系统思维(在能力建设、规划和资源分配方面的有用性,例如测试和个人防护设备)。该框架旨在作为一个起点和通用工具,可以适应 COVID-19 以外的其他在线分诊工具。符合所有七个标准的 COVID-19 在线分诊工具可以被认为是适合目的的。在线分诊工具的有用性取决于其上下文和目的。