Gamal El-Din Mariam I, Youssef Fadia S, Altyar Ahmed E, Ashour Mohamed L
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain-Shams University, Abbasia, Cairo 11566, Egypt.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80260, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Plants (Basel). 2022 May 9;11(9):1268. doi: 10.3390/plants11091268.
The essential oils of , and (Euphorbiaceae) were analyzed employing GC/MS (Gas Chromatography coupled with Mass Spectrometry) analyses. A total of 95 volatile constituents were identified from and essential oils, accounting for 91.61, 90.12, and 86.24%, respectively. Chemometric analysis using principal component analysis (PCA) based on the obtained GC data revealed the formation of three discriminant clusters due to the placement of the three species in three different quadrants, highlighting the dissimilarity between them. Heneicosane, phytol, nonacosane, silphiperfol-6-ene, copaborneol, hexatriacontane, octadecamethyl-cyclononasiloxane, 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester and methyl linoleate constitute the key markers for their differentiation. antibacterial activities of the essential oils were investigated at doses of 10 mg/mL against the Gram-negative anaerobe using the agar well diffusion method and broth microdilution test. essential oil showed the most potent antimicrobial activity, demonstrating the largest inhibition zone (11.90 mm) and the least minimum inhibitory concentration (2.50 mg/mL), followed by the essential oil of . The essential oils were evaluated for their anti-adhesion properties against the Gram-negative biofilm using a modified method of biofilm inhibition spectrophotometric assay. essential oil showed the most potent biofilm inhibitory activity, demonstrating the least minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of 31.25 µg/mL. molecular docking performed within the active center of adhesion protein FimH showed that heneicosane, followed by cubebol and methyl linoleate, displayed the best fitting score. Thus, it can be concluded that the essential oils of and leaves represent promising sources for antibacterial drugs with antibiofilm potential.
对大戟科的[具体植物名称1]、[具体植物名称2]和[具体植物名称3]的精油进行了气相色谱-质谱联用(GC/MS)分析。从[具体植物名称1]、[具体植物名称2]和[具体植物名称3]的精油中总共鉴定出95种挥发性成分,分别占91.61%、90.12%和86.24%。基于获得的GC数据,使用主成分分析(PCA)进行化学计量分析,结果显示由于这三种[植物名称]物种位于三个不同象限,形成了三个判别簇,突出了它们之间的差异。二十一烷、叶绿醇、二十九烷、半日花-6-烯、异长叶薄荷醇、三十六烷、十八甲基环壬硅氧烷、9,12,15-十八碳三烯酸甲酯和亚油酸甲酯是它们区分的关键标志物。使用琼脂孔扩散法和肉汤微量稀释试验,研究了这些精油在10 mg/mL剂量下对革兰氏阴性厌氧菌[具体细菌名称]的抗菌活性。[具体植物名称1]精油显示出最强的抗菌活性,抑菌圈最大(11.90 mm),最低抑菌浓度最低(2.50 mg/mL),其次是[具体植物名称2]的精油。使用改良的生物膜抑制分光光度法测定法,评估了这些精油对革兰氏阴性[具体细菌名称]生物膜的抗粘附特性。[具体植物名称1]精油显示出最强的生物膜抑制活性,最低生物膜抑制浓度(MBIC)最低,为31.25 µg/mL。在粘附蛋白FimH的活性中心进行的分子对接显示,二十一烷,其次是荜澄茄醇和亚油酸甲酯,显示出最佳的拟合分数。因此,可以得出结论,[具体植物名称1]和[具体植物名称2]叶子的精油是具有抗生物膜潜力的抗菌药物的有前途的来源。