Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 13;12(5):e058946. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058946.
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control recommends health warning labels (HWLs) include an attribution source. Little is known regarding the perceived credibility and effectiveness of different message sources. This study examined perceptions of four HWL attribution sources among adults in China - the world's largest consumer of cigarettes.
Cross-sectional experimental survey design.
Data were collected in 2017 from a convenience sample of 1999 adults across four cities in China; 80% of the sample were current smokers.
Participants viewed four versions of the same HWL, each with a different attribution source: the China Center for Disease Control (ref. group); the regulatory arm of China's domestic tobacco company (STMA); Liyuan Peng, China's first lady; and the WHO. Respondents indicated which HWL was the most: (1) credible, (2) effective at making people quit and (3) effective at preventing youth initiation.
Multinomial logistic regression models estimated adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRRs) of the three outcomes. Controlling for demographics and smoking status, HWLs attributed to STMA and Liyuan Peng, respectively, were perceived as significantly less credible (aRRR=0.81, p<0.001; aRRR=0.31, p<0.001), less effective at making people quit (aRRR=0.46, p<0.001; aRRR=0.24, p<0.001) and less effective at preventing young smoking (aRRR=0.52, p<0.001; aRRR=0.39, p<0.001) than the China CDC HWL. There were no significant differences in perceived effectiveness of between the WHO and China CDC HWLs. Participants viewed the WHO HWL as significantly more credible (aRRR=1.21, p<0.001) than the China CDC HWL.
Results suggest the unique role of health organisations in conveying smoking-related messages that appear credible and effective at motivating others to quit smoking or never start smoking in China. Findings can inform global recommendations regarding HWL attribution sources.
《烟草控制框架公约》建议健康警示标签(HWLs)包含归因来源。对于不同信息来源的感知可信度和有效性知之甚少。本研究在中国四个城市的成年人中调查了对四种 HWL 归因来源的看法 - 这是世界上最大的香烟消费者。
横断面实验调查设计。
2017 年,从中国四个城市的 1999 名成年人中收集了数据;样本的 80%是当前吸烟者。
参与者观看了四个相同 HWL 的版本,每个版本都有不同的归因来源:中国疾病预防控制中心(参考组);中国国内烟草公司的监管部门(STMA);彭丽媛,中国第一夫人;以及世界卫生组织。受访者表示,哪个 HWL 最:(1)可信,(2)有效使人戒烟,(3)有效预防青少年开始吸烟。
多变量逻辑回归模型估计了三种结果的调整相对风险比(aRRR)。控制人口统计学和吸烟状况,分别归因于 STMA 和彭丽媛的 HWL 被认为明显缺乏可信度(aRRR=0.81,p<0.001;aRRR=0.31,p<0.001),降低人们戒烟的效果(aRRR=0.46,p<0.001;aRRR=0.24,p<0.001)和降低预防青少年吸烟的效果(aRRR=0.52,p<0.001;aRRR=0.39,p<0.001)比中国疾病预防控制中心的 HWL 低。世界卫生组织和中国疾病预防控制中心 HWL 之间的感知效果没有显著差异。参与者认为世界卫生组织 HWL 比中国疾病预防控制中心 HWL 更可信(aRRR=1.21,p<0.001)。
结果表明,卫生组织在传达与吸烟相关的信息方面具有独特的作用,这些信息在激励他人戒烟或从未开始吸烟方面似乎具有可信度和有效性。研究结果可为全球关于 HWL 归因来源的建议提供信息。