Jarman Kristen L, Kowitt Sarah D, Cornacchione Ross Jennifer, Goldstein Adam O
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 10;14(11):1370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111370.
: Text warnings are mandated on cigars sold in the United States (U.S.), however little published research has examined effectiveness of cigar warnings. This is the first study examining the believability of cigar warnings among adults in the U.S. : Adults in the U.S. ( = 5014) were randomized in a phone survey to receive one of three cigar-specific mandated warning messages ("Cigar smoking can cause cancers of the mouth and throat, even if you do not inhale", "Cigar smoking can cause lung cancer and heart disease", and "Cigars are not a safe alternative to cigarettes") with one of four warning sources (no source, Surgeon General, CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), FDA (Food and Drug Administration)). : Most adults found the cigar warnings very believable (66.9%). Weighted logistic regression results indicate that the message "Cigar smoking can cause lung cancer and heart disease" was associated with higher odds of being very believable (AOR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.55, 2.70) and the message "Cigars are not a safe alternative to cigarettes" was associated with lower odds of being very believable (AOR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.92) compared to the message "Cigar smoking can cause cancers of the mouth and throat, even if you do not inhale". Warning source had no impact on believability. : We tested three of the currently mandated cigar warnings in the U.S. and found significant differences in believability between them. Further research on cigar warnings may improve communication to the public on cigar health risks, ultimately preventing uptake of cigars and promoting cessation among cigar users.
在美国销售的雪茄必须带有文本警告,然而,很少有已发表的研究探讨雪茄警告的有效性。这是第一项研究美国成年人对雪茄警告可信度的研究。美国成年人(n = 5014)在电话调查中被随机分组,以接收三种特定于雪茄的法定警告信息之一(“即使不吸入,抽雪茄也会导致口腔和咽喉癌”、“抽雪茄会导致肺癌和心脏病”以及“雪茄并非香烟的安全替代品”),并搭配四种警告来源之一(无来源、卫生局局长、疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)、食品药品监督管理局(FDA))。大多数成年人认为雪茄警告非常可信(66.9%)。加权逻辑回归结果表明,与“即使不吸入,抽雪茄也会导致口腔和咽喉癌”这一信息相比,“抽雪茄会导致肺癌和心脏病”这一信息与非常可信的较高几率相关(调整后比值比:2.05,95%置信区间:1.55,2.70),而“雪茄并非香烟的安全替代品”这一信息与非常可信的较低几率相关(调整后比值比:0.71,95%置信区间:0.55,0.92)。警告来源对可信度没有影响。我们测试了美国目前法定的三种雪茄警告,发现它们在可信度上存在显著差异。对雪茄警告的进一步研究可能会改善向公众传达雪茄健康风险的情况,最终防止人们吸食雪茄并促进雪茄使用者戒烟。