• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高研究诚信:负责任的科学传播框架。

Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.

Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, R3 Center for Innovation in Science Education, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 15;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5
PMID:35570294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107633/
Abstract

Research integrity, an essential precept of scientific inquiry and discovery, comprises norms such as Rigor, Reproducibility, and Responsibility (the 3R's). Over the past decades, numerous issues have arisen that challenge the reliability of scientific studies, including irreproducibility crises, lack of good scientific principles, and erroneous communications, which have impacted the public's trust in science and its findings. Here, we highlight one important component of research integrity that is often overlooked in the discussion of proposals for improving research quality and promoting robust research; one that spans from the lab bench to the dissemination of scientific work: responsible science communication. We briefly outline the role of education and institutions of higher education in teaching the tenets of good scientific practice and within that, the importance of adequate communications training. In that context, we present our framework of responsible science communication that we live by and teach to our students in courses and workshops that are part of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health R Center for Innovation in Science Education.

摘要

研究诚信是科学探究和发现的基本原则之一,它包含了严谨性、可重复性和责任性(即 3R)等规范。在过去的几十年中,出现了许多挑战科学研究可靠性的问题,包括不可重复性危机、缺乏良好的科学原则以及错误的交流,这些问题已经影响了公众对科学及其发现的信任。在这里,我们强调研究诚信的一个重要组成部分,这在讨论提高研究质量和促进稳健研究的建议时往往被忽视:从实验室工作台到科学工作的传播,贯穿始终的负责任的科学交流。我们简要概述了教育和高等教育机构在教授良好科学实践原则方面的作用,以及在这其中,充分的交流培训的重要性。在这种情况下,我们提出了我们的负责任的科学交流框架,我们在课程和工作坊中向学生传授这些内容,这些课程和工作坊是约翰霍普金斯彭博公共卫生学院创新科学教育中心的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13c/9107633/3b419952fcca/13104_2022_6065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13c/9107633/3b419952fcca/13104_2022_6065_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b13c/9107633/3b419952fcca/13104_2022_6065_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication.提高研究诚信:负责任的科学传播框架。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 15;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06065-5.
2
Teaching students to R3eason, not merely to solve problem sets: The role of philosophy and visual data communication in accessible data science education.教导学生推理,而不只是解决习题集:哲学和可视数据交流在可访问的数据科学教育中的作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 8;19(6):e1011160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011160. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
4
Reproducibility and research integrity: the role of scientists and institutions.可重复性和研究诚信:科学家和机构的作用。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Dec 14;14(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05875-3.
5
Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research.提高开放和严谨科学:与科学研究严谨性、可重复性和透明性相关的十个关键未来研究机会。
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 14;9:1235. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.26594.1. eCollection 2020.
6
Research Integrity definitions and challenges.研究诚信的定义和挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;171:111367. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111367. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
7
Best practices in nutrition science to earn and keep the public's trust.营养科学领域赢得和保持公众信任的最佳实践。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;109(1):225-243. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy337.
8
Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research. Part I: Current approaches in doctoral programs.促进护理研究中的科学诚信。第一部分:博士项目中的当前方法。
J Prof Nurs. 1995 Jul-Aug;11(4):213-9. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(95)80022-0.
9
Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.加强数据监测委员会与机构审查委员会之间的沟通。
Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):277-82. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091262.
10
The Japanese science education centers.日本科学教育中心。
Science. 1966 Oct 14;154(3746):221-8. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3746.221.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Open Science Tools to Teach Environmental Sciences.使用开放科学工具教授环境科学。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e71837. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71837. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Self-reported quality of life in progressive cognitive decline-let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.进行性认知衰退中自我报告的生活质量——我们不要因噎废食。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04009-7.
3
Interdisciplinarity at the nexus of biomedical science training: The R3 Center for Innovation in Science Education.生物医学科学培训核心领域的跨学科性:R3科学教育创新中心。

本文引用的文献

1
An anchor in troubled times: Trust in science before and within the COVID-19 pandemic.疫情时期的定海神针:新冠疫情之前和期间对科学的信任。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262823. eCollection 2022.
2
Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust.透明地沟通 COVID-19 疫苗的负面特征会降低其接受度,但会增加信任。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024597118. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
3
Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence.
iScience. 2025 Jun 5;28(6):112735. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112735. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
4
Sexual harassment complaints across BSE100 companies: a longitudinal dataset (2013-2023).BSE100公司的性骚扰投诉:一个纵向数据集(2013 - 2023年)
BMC Res Notes. 2025 May 22;18(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07294-0.
5
An Assessment of Clinical Research Self-Efficacy among Researchers at the Largest Healthcare Institute in Qatar: Recommendations and Future Actions.卡塔尔最大医疗保健机构研究人员的临床研究自我效能评估:建议与未来行动
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jun 7;11:23821205241233425. doi: 10.1177/23821205241233425. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Teaching students to R3eason, not merely to solve problem sets: The role of philosophy and visual data communication in accessible data science education.教导学生推理,而不只是解决习题集:哲学和可视数据交流在可访问的数据科学教育中的作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jun 8;19(6):e1011160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011160. eCollection 2023 Jun.
信任科学、社会共识和疫苗信心。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Nov;5(11):1528-1534. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Misinformation in and about science.科学中的错误信息和围绕科学的错误信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912444117.
5
Transparency during global health emergencies.全球卫生紧急事件期间的透明度。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e441. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30198-9. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
From deficit to dialogue in science communication: The dialogue communication model requires additional roles from scientists.从科学传播的“赤字”到对话:对话传播模式需要科学家扮演更多角色。
EMBO Rep. 2020 Sep 3;21(9):e51278. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051278. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
An "alarming" and "exceptionally high" rate of COVID-19 retractions?“令人震惊”且“异常高”的 COVID-19 撤稿率?
Account Res. 2021 Jan;28(1):58-59. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1793675. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
8
Coronavirus misinformation, and how scientists can help to fight it.冠状病毒错误信息,以及科学家如何助力对抗它。
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7814):155-156. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01834-3.
9
An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).关于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的科学出版物惊人的撤回率。
Account Res. 2021 Jan;28(1):47-53. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
10
Train PhD students to be thinkers not just specialists.培养博士生成为有思想的人,而不仅仅是专家。
Nature. 2018 Feb;554(7692):277. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-01853-1.