College of Management and Economics, Center for Social Science Survey and Data Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
College of Politics and Public Administration, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;10:842373. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842373. eCollection 2022.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has threatened the state's governance and public safety. This study investigates whether and how public participation can affect central government policy response to this pandemic in the context of China.
This study constructs the theoretical framework based on theoretical analysis, and Social Network Analysis is used to analyze data on the public participation, New Media, and the central government response in this pandemic.
Findings show that the Chinese central government does not always adopt top-down elitist governance strategies in risk management. The central government will also adopt the bottom-up governance strategy triggered by public participation. In this process, New Media acts as a catalyst. Specifically, when faced with a public emergency and needs a policy response from the central government, public participation firstly creates "participation" with the authority of the media, forms public opinion, and then the prompt policy response from the central government.
This study confirms that the central government will refer to public participation to decide the policy response. It also shows that the theory of government response applies to both the local government and the central government.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情威胁到国家治理和公共安全。本研究调查在这种情况下,公众参与是否以及如何影响中央政府对这一大流行病的政策反应。
本研究基于理论分析构建了理论框架,并利用社会网络分析方法分析了疫情期间公众参与、新媒体和中央政府反应的数据。
研究结果表明,中国中央政府在风险管理中并不总是采取自上而下的精英治理策略。中央政府也将采取由公众参与引发的自下而上的治理策略。在这个过程中,新媒体充当了催化剂。具体来说,当面临公共紧急情况并需要中央政府的政策回应时,公众参与首先通过媒体的权威创造“参与”,形成公众舆论,然后中央政府迅速做出政策回应。
本研究证实中央政府将参考公众参与来决定政策反应。它还表明,政府应对理论既适用于地方政府,也适用于中央政府。