Suppr超能文献

社会参与是否会影响中国中央政府对 COVID-19 的公共政策反应。

Whether Social Participation Can Affect the Central Government Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 in China.

机构信息

College of Management and Economics, Center for Social Science Survey and Data Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

College of Politics and Public Administration, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;10:842373. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842373. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has threatened the state's governance and public safety. This study investigates whether and how public participation can affect central government policy response to this pandemic in the context of China.

METHODS

This study constructs the theoretical framework based on theoretical analysis, and Social Network Analysis is used to analyze data on the public participation, New Media, and the central government response in this pandemic.

RESULTS

Findings show that the Chinese central government does not always adopt top-down elitist governance strategies in risk management. The central government will also adopt the bottom-up governance strategy triggered by public participation. In this process, New Media acts as a catalyst. Specifically, when faced with a public emergency and needs a policy response from the central government, public participation firstly creates "participation" with the authority of the media, forms public opinion, and then the prompt policy response from the central government.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the central government will refer to public participation to decide the policy response. It also shows that the theory of government response applies to both the local government and the central government.

摘要

目的

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情威胁到国家治理和公共安全。本研究调查在这种情况下,公众参与是否以及如何影响中央政府对这一大流行病的政策反应。

方法

本研究基于理论分析构建了理论框架,并利用社会网络分析方法分析了疫情期间公众参与、新媒体和中央政府反应的数据。

结果

研究结果表明,中国中央政府在风险管理中并不总是采取自上而下的精英治理策略。中央政府也将采取由公众参与引发的自下而上的治理策略。在这个过程中,新媒体充当了催化剂。具体来说,当面临公共紧急情况并需要中央政府的政策回应时,公众参与首先通过媒体的权威创造“参与”,形成公众舆论,然后中央政府迅速做出政策回应。

结论

本研究证实中央政府将参考公众参与来决定政策反应。它还表明,政府应对理论既适用于地方政府,也适用于中央政府。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7012/9093180/62c3ab2d3496/fpubh-10-842373-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Whether Social Participation Can Affect the Central Government Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 in China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;10:842373. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842373. eCollection 2022.
2
How China controls the Covid-19 epidemic through public health expenditure and policy?
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):437-449. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2054202.
3
Mechanisms of the Chinese Government's Efforts to Fight COVID-19: Integration of Top-Down Interventions and Local Governance.
Health Secur. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):348-356. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0161. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
Contested leadership and the governance of COVID-19 in Brazil: The role of local government and community activism.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr;17(4):483-495. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2028304. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
6
Publicity governance in contingency management during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A "Government-Society" perspective.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0293210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293210. eCollection 2023.
7
China's model to combat the COVID-19 epidemic: a public health emergency governance approach.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Jul 14;5:34. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00161-4. eCollection 2020.
9
Using Grounded Theory to Identify Online Public Opinion in China to Improve Risk Management-The Case of COVID-19.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;19(22):14754. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214754.
10
Which Matters More in Fighting COVID-19-Government Policy or Community Participation?
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:927553. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.927553. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Health Equity in Times of a Pandemic: A Plea for a Participatory Systems Approach in Public Health.
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 29;9:689237. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689237. eCollection 2021.
2
The Swedish COVID-19 strategy revisited.
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00885-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
COVID-19: Rethinking the Lockdown Groupthink.
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;9:625778. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.625778. eCollection 2021.
4
Impact of COVID-19 Lockdown on Physical Activity Among the Chinese Youths: The COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey (COINLICS).
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;9:592795. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.592795. eCollection 2021.
6
COVID-19 and the Swedish enigma.
Lancet. 2021 Jan 23;397(10271):259-261. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32750-1. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
A collaborative effort of China in combating COVID-19.
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Nov 11;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00174-z.
9
A Survey of Psychological Responses During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemic among Chinese Police Officers in Wuhu.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov 20;13:2689-2697. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S269886. eCollection 2020.
10
Are Lockdown Measures Effective Against COVID-19?
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;8:549692. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.549692. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验