• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首席执行官关系型领导与产品创新绩效:高层管理团队行为与特征的作用

CEO Relational Leadership and Product Innovation Performance: The Roles of TMT Behavior and Characteristics.

作者信息

Wang Yimin, Su Qianhong, Sun Wei

机构信息

School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 27;13:874105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874105. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874105
PMID:35572272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9093137/
Abstract

CEO leadership is considered a critical antecedent of product innovation performance, but the relational aspect of leadership has been largely neglected in this area. Drawing on upper echelons theory and relational leadership literature, this study explores , , and CEO relational leadership influences product innovation performance. Specifically, we analyze the underlying mechanism of TMT (top management team) voice behavior and two boundary conditions-TMT educational level and TMT age. Based on multi-source and multi-wave data on 105 Chinese firms, this study finds that CEO relational leadership plays an important role in promoting product innovation performance through the intervening mechanism of TMT voice behavior. Furthermore, the positive relationship between CEO relational leadership and TMT voice behavior is stronger in TMTs with higher educational level and lower age. This study contributes to the existing literature by empirically examining the under-investigated relationship between CEO relational leadership and product innovation performance, and by disentangling the underlying mechanism and boundary conditions.

摘要

首席执行官领导力被视为产品创新绩效的关键前提,但领导力的关系层面在这一领域很大程度上被忽视了。本研究借鉴高层梯队理论和关系型领导文献,探讨首席执行官关系型领导力如何影响产品创新绩效。具体而言,我们分析了高层管理团队(TMT)建言行为的潜在机制以及两个边界条件——TMT教育水平和TMT年龄。基于对105家中国企业的多源多波数据,本研究发现,首席执行官关系型领导力通过TMT建言行为的中介机制在促进产品创新绩效方面发挥着重要作用。此外,在教育水平较高且年龄较小的TMT中,首席执行官关系型领导力与TMT建言行为之间的正向关系更强。本研究通过实证检验首席执行官关系型领导力与产品创新绩效之间未被充分研究的关系,并厘清潜在机制和边界条件,为现有文献做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/0f2375b2c0a6/fpsyg-13-874105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/17d2e4c36458/fpsyg-13-874105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/62f8973dc8a8/fpsyg-13-874105-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/0f2375b2c0a6/fpsyg-13-874105-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/17d2e4c36458/fpsyg-13-874105-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/62f8973dc8a8/fpsyg-13-874105-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b621/9093137/0f2375b2c0a6/fpsyg-13-874105-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
CEO Relational Leadership and Product Innovation Performance: The Roles of TMT Behavior and Characteristics.首席执行官关系型领导与产品创新绩效:高层管理团队行为与特征的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 27;13:874105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874105. eCollection 2022.
2
How CEO Workaholism Influences Firm Performance: The Roles of Collective Organizational Engagement and TMT Power Distance.首席执行官工作狂如何影响公司绩效:集体组织敬业度和高层管理团队权力距离的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:725199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725199. eCollection 2021.
3
How CEO Ethical Leadership Influences Top Management Team Creativity: Evidence From China.首席执行官的道德领导力如何影响高层管理团队的创造力:来自中国的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 21;11:748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00748. eCollection 2020.
4
Do Visionary-Feedback Seeking CEOs Enhance Firm Sustainability Through Eco-Innovation? A Moderated Mediation Model.追求愿景反馈的首席执行官们是否通过生态创新提升企业可持续性?一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 31;12:750885. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750885. eCollection 2021.
5
CEO-TMT overseas experience differences and firm performance: A self-categorization theory perspective.首席执行官-高层管理团队海外经历差异与企业绩效:自我分类理论视角
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 1;9(7):e17845. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17845. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
CEO Turnover, Leadership Identity, and TMT Creativity in a Cross-Cultural Context.跨文化背景下的首席执行官更替、领导身份与高层管理团队创造力
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 25;12:610526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610526. eCollection 2021.
7
CEO Empowering Leadership and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Roles of TMT Information Elaboration and Environmental Dynamism.首席执行官赋能型领导与公司创业:高层管理团队信息精细化与环境动态性的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;12:671232. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671232. eCollection 2021.
8
Top Management Team Intrapersonal Functional Diversity and Adaptive Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of the CEO-TMT Power Gap and Severity of Threat.高层管理团队内部人际功能多样性与企业适应性绩效:CEO-高层管理团队权力差距和威胁严重程度的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:772739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772739. eCollection 2021.
9
CEO successor origins, top management team faultline, and strategic change-empirical evidence from China.首席执行官继任者来源、高层管理团队断层线与战略变革——来自中国的实证证据
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 25;9(9):e19200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19200. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
The necessity of others: Entrepreneurial self-efficacy, TMT collective efficacy, CEO-TMT interface, and entrepreneurial orientation.他人的必要性:创业自我效能、高层管理团队集体效能、首席执行官与高层管理团队的互动界面以及创业导向
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1095978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095978. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the relationship between executive cognition and innovation performance of SRDI SMEs.科技型中小企业高管认知与创新绩效的关系研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1493242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1493242. eCollection 2025.
2
Foreign executives, digital transformation, and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese-listed firms.外籍高管、数字化转型与创新绩效:来自中国上市公司的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0305144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305144. eCollection 2024.
3
Firm innovation activities and consumer brand loyalty: A path to business sustainability in Asia.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.
2
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
3
Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability.
企业创新活动与消费者品牌忠诚度:亚洲商业可持续发展之路。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:942048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942048. eCollection 2022.
作为情境绩效不同形式的发声与合作行为:与大五人格特质及认知能力的差异关系证据
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Apr;86(2):326-36. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326.