• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高层管理团队内部人际功能多样性与企业适应性绩效:CEO-高层管理团队权力差距和威胁严重程度的调节作用

Top Management Team Intrapersonal Functional Diversity and Adaptive Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of the CEO-TMT Power Gap and Severity of Threat.

作者信息

Ma Changlong, Ge Yuhui, Wang Jingwei

机构信息

Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:772739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772739. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772739
PMID:35002863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8733211/
Abstract

While usually argued to be improving firm performance, the effect of top management team (TMT) functional diversity on firm performance is mixed. Bridging the TMT diversity, team adaptation, and threat-rigidity literature, we present a contingency model in which the relationships between intrapersonal functional diversity (at both CEO and TMT levels) and adaptive firm performance depend on the CEO-TMT power gap and severity of threat. To test our hypotheses, 270 firms, which have been severely affected due to the COVID-19 pandemic, were selected from China's A-share listed companies. Multiple regression analyses have shown that a moderation of CEO intrapersonal functional diversity's effect on adaptive firm performance by the CEO-TMT power gap is moderated by the severity of threat. However, no significant main or interaction effect of TMT intrapersonal functional diversity was found. The findings of this study have implications for the recovery or improvement of firm performance in threat situations.

摘要

虽然通常认为高层管理团队(TMT)职能多样性会提升公司绩效,但它对公司绩效的影响却喜忧参半。整合TMT多样性、团队适应性和威胁僵化方面的文献,我们提出了一个权变模型,其中个人职能多样性(在首席执行官和TMT层面)与适应性公司绩效之间的关系取决于首席执行官与TMT的权力差距和威胁的严重程度。为了检验我们的假设,从中国A股上市公司中选取了270家因新冠疫情受到严重影响的公司。多元回归分析表明,首席执行官与TMT的权力差距对首席执行官个人职能多样性对适应性公司绩效的影响具有调节作用,而这种调节作用又受到威胁严重程度的影响。然而,未发现TMT个人职能多样性有显著的主效应或交互效应。本研究的结果对处于威胁情境下公司绩效的恢复或改善具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e3/8733211/c074c775196d/fpsyg-12-772739-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e3/8733211/6b79538ea0c3/fpsyg-12-772739-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e3/8733211/c074c775196d/fpsyg-12-772739-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e3/8733211/6b79538ea0c3/fpsyg-12-772739-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46e3/8733211/c074c775196d/fpsyg-12-772739-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Top Management Team Intrapersonal Functional Diversity and Adaptive Firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of the CEO-TMT Power Gap and Severity of Threat.高层管理团队内部人际功能多样性与企业适应性绩效:CEO-高层管理团队权力差距和威胁严重程度的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:772739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772739. eCollection 2021.
2
CEO-TMT overseas experience differences and firm performance: A self-categorization theory perspective.首席执行官-高层管理团队海外经历差异与企业绩效:自我分类理论视角
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 1;9(7):e17845. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17845. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
How CEO Workaholism Influences Firm Performance: The Roles of Collective Organizational Engagement and TMT Power Distance.首席执行官工作狂如何影响公司绩效:集体组织敬业度和高层管理团队权力距离的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:725199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725199. eCollection 2021.
4
How CEO Ethical Leadership Influences Top Management Team Creativity: Evidence From China.首席执行官的道德领导力如何影响高层管理团队的创造力:来自中国的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 May 21;11:748. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00748. eCollection 2020.
5
CEO successor origins, top management team faultline, and strategic change-empirical evidence from China.首席执行官继任者来源、高层管理团队断层线与战略变革——来自中国的实证证据
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 25;9(9):e19200. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19200. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Data of CEO power, chair-CEO age dissimilarity and pay gap of Chinese listed firms.中国上市公司的首席执行官权力、董事长与首席执行官年龄差异及薪酬差距数据。
Data Brief. 2020 Aug 8;32:106158. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106158. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
CEO Turnover, Leadership Identity, and TMT Creativity in a Cross-Cultural Context.跨文化背景下的首席执行官更替、领导身份与高层管理团队创造力
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 25;12:610526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.610526. eCollection 2021.
8
CEO Relational Leadership and Product Innovation Performance: The Roles of TMT Behavior and Characteristics.首席执行官关系型领导与产品创新绩效:高层管理团队行为与特征的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 27;13:874105. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874105. eCollection 2022.
9
Female CEOs and the compensation of other top managers.女性首席执行官与其他高管薪酬。
J Appl Psychol. 2022 Dec;107(12):2306-2318. doi: 10.1037/apl0000988. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
10
Burden or Blessing? CEO Early-Life Adversity Experience and Firm Internationalization Performance.负担还是福祉?首席执行官早年逆境经历与企业国际化绩效
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:855316. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855316. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of top management team tenure heterogeneity on innovation efficiency of declining firms.高层管理团队任期异质性对衰退型企业创新效率的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0313624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313624. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior.信息、来源和情境对员工建言行为评价的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):159-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024871. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
2
The personal sense of power.个人力量感。
J Pers. 2012 Apr;80(2):313-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
3
Building the infrastructure: the effects of role identification behaviors on team cognition development and performance.构建基础设施:角色识别行为对团队认知发展和绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Jan;95(1):192-200. doi: 10.1037/a0017781.
4
Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations.用于探究普通最小二乘法(OLS)和逻辑回归中交互作用的计算程序:SPSS和SAS实现方法
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Aug;41(3):924-36. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.924.
5
Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model.理解团队适应性:概念分析与模型
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1189-207. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189.
6
Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models.组织中的团队:从输入-过程-输出模型到IMOI模型。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:517-43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250.
7
Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.领导者简报和团队互动培训对团队适应新环境的绩效影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Dec;85(6):971-86. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971.
8
The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.共享心智模型对团队过程和绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):273-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273.
9
Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation.高层管理团队的权力:维度、测量与验证。
Acad Manage J. 1992 Aug;35(3):505-38.