Suppr超能文献

抗生素与安慰剂治疗 CT 证实的成人单纯性急性阑尾炎(APPAC III):随机双盲优效性试验。

Antibiotics versus placebo in adults with CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis (APPAC III): randomized double-blind superiority trial.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2022 May 16;109(6):503-509. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac086.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-operative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is an option, but omission of antibiotics from the regimen has not been tested.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority RCT in adults with CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis was designed to compare placebo with antibiotics (intravenous ertapenem followed by oral levofloxacin and metronidazole). The primary endpoint was treatment success (resolution resulting in discharge without appendicectomy within 10 days); secondary outcomes included pain scores, complications, hospital stay, and return to work.

RESULTS

From May 2017 to September 2020, 72 patients with a mean(s.d.) age of 37.5 (11.1) years were recruited at five hospitals. Six were excluded after randomization (5 early consent withdrawals, 1 randomization protocol violation), 35 were assigned to receive antibiotics, and 31 to receive placebo. Enrolment challenges (including hospital pharmacy resources in an acute-care surgery setting) meant that only the lowest sample size of three predefined scenarios was achieved. The 10-day treatment success rate was 87 (95 per cent c.i. 75 to 99) per cent for placebo and 97 (92 to 100) per cent for antibiotics. This clinical difference of 10 (90 per cent c.i. -0.9 to 21) per cent was not statistically different for the primary outcome (1-sided P = 0.142), and secondary outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

The lack of antibiotic superiority statistically suggests that a non-inferiority trial against placebo is warranted in adults with CT-confirmed mild appendicitis. Registration number: EudraCT 2015-003634-26 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/eudract-web/index.faces), NCT03234296 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

背景

非手术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎是一种选择,但尚未对方案中不使用抗生素进行测试。

方法

一项针对 CT 确诊的单纯性急性阑尾炎成人患者的双盲、安慰剂对照、优效性 RCT 设计,旨在比较安慰剂与抗生素(静脉注射厄他培南,随后口服左氧氟沙星和甲硝唑)。主要终点为治疗成功(10 天内无阑尾切除且症状缓解而出院);次要结局包括疼痛评分、并发症、住院时间和恢复工作。

结果

2017 年 5 月至 2020 年 9 月,在五家医院共招募了 72 名平均(标准差)年龄为 37.5(11.1)岁的患者。随机分组后有 6 名患者被排除(5 名提前同意退出,1 名违反随机分组方案),35 名患者接受抗生素治疗,31 名患者接受安慰剂治疗。由于在急性外科手术环境下医院药房资源方面的入组挑战,仅实现了三个预先设定方案中最低的样本量。安慰剂组 10 天的治疗成功率为 87(95%可信区间 75 至 99)%,抗生素组为 97(92 至 100)%。这一临床差异为 10(90%可信区间 -0.9 至 21)%,主要结局无统计学差异(单侧 P = 0.142),次要结局也相似。

结论

抗生素无显著优势,表明在 CT 确诊的轻度阑尾炎成人患者中,安慰剂对照的非劣效性试验是合理的。注册号:EudraCT 2015-003634-26(https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/eudract-web/index.faces),NCT03234296(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c61/10364767/836edf039f20/znac086f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验