• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ROSA ONE脊柱系统经椎弓根螺钉置入的学习曲线

Learning Curve of ROSA ONE Spine System for Transpedicular Screw Placement.

作者信息

Hsu Bing-Hung, Liu Heng-Wei, Lee Kha-Liang, Lin Ming-Chin, Chen Gao, Yu Jang, Chen Chiao-Ling, Su I-Chang, Lin Chien-Min

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Neurospine. 2022 Jun;19(2):367-375. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143126.563. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.14245/ns.2143126.563
PMID:35577339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9260560/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study investigated our institutional learning curve for the ROSA ONE spine system (ROSA) based on ROSA usage time.

METHODS

ROSA was designed to provide high accuracy for spinal pedicle screw placement through a built-in tracking technique. This study was conducted from November 2018 to January 2021. The time taken to complete each step of the robotic workflow was recorded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical indications, and number of screw placements were examined in subgroup analysis. The Curve Fitting-General package (a part of NCSS 2021 software) was used to fit a mathematical model to the learning curve. Patient demographics, imaging data, and surgical time were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients who had undergone surgery were included. The mean total ROSA usage time was 107.1 ± 27.3 minutes. The estimated learning rate was 90.4%, and the largest slope change occurred close to the time of the 20th surgery. The observed overall learning trend in the 4-screw group could be attributed to screw planning. The presence of scoliosis (p = 0.73) or spondylolisthesis (p = 0.70) did not significantly influence the mean total time (TT) for all patients; however, the mean TT differed significantly (p < 0.01) among subgroups stratified by body mass index, screw number placement, and thoracic spine involvement.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the learning curve for the various crucial steps of ROSA-guided pedicle screw placement. The indicative learning curve involved 20 patients who had undergone surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究基于ROSA ONE脊柱系统(ROSA)的使用时间,调查了我们机构的学习曲线。

方法

ROSA旨在通过内置跟踪技术为脊柱椎弓根螺钉置入提供高精度。本研究于2018年11月至2021年1月进行。记录完成机器人工作流程每个步骤所需的时间。在亚组分析中检查了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、手术指征和螺钉置入数量。使用曲线拟合通用软件包(NCSS 2021软件的一部分)对学习曲线进行数学模型拟合。对患者的人口统计学特征、影像数据和手术时间进行回顾性分析。

结果

共纳入167例接受手术的患者。ROSA的平均总使用时间为107.1±27.3分钟。估计学习率为90.4%,最大斜率变化发生在第20次手术时。在4螺钉组中观察到的总体学习趋势可归因于螺钉规划。脊柱侧弯(p = 0.73)或椎体滑脱(p = 0.70)的存在对所有患者的平均总时间(TT)没有显著影响;然而,按体重指数、螺钉置入数量和胸椎受累情况分层的亚组之间的平均TT差异显著(p < 0.01)。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项研究ROSA引导下椎弓根螺钉置入各个关键步骤学习曲线的研究。指示性学习曲线涉及20例接受手术的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/9a2337926d95/ns-2143126-563f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/e47f1baa649d/ns-2143126-563f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/8b0987d183ed/ns-2143126-563f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/54077e2635d4/ns-2143126-563f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/9a2337926d95/ns-2143126-563f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/e47f1baa649d/ns-2143126-563f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/8b0987d183ed/ns-2143126-563f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/54077e2635d4/ns-2143126-563f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f04b/9260560/9a2337926d95/ns-2143126-563f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning Curve of ROSA ONE Spine System for Transpedicular Screw Placement.ROSA ONE脊柱系统经椎弓根螺钉置入的学习曲线
Neurospine. 2022 Jun;19(2):367-375. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143126.563. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine.三维荧光透视图像引导下胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入的学习曲线
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):467-76. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
3
What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?机器人辅助脊柱手术中椎弓根螺钉置钉的学习曲线是怎样的?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1839-44. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3291-1.
4
Next-Generation Robotic Spine Surgery: First Report on Feasibility, Safety, and Learning Curve.下一代机器人脊柱手术:可行性、安全性和学习曲线的首次报告。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019 Jul 1;17(1):61-69. doi: 10.1093/ons/opy280.
5
Learning curve for placement of thoracic pedicle screws in the deformed spine.胸椎弓根螺钉在畸形脊柱中的置钉学习曲线。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Feb;66(2):290-4; discussion 294-5. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000363853.62897.94.
6
Does Three-dimensional Printing Plus Pedicle Guider Technology in Severe Congenital Scoliosis Facilitate Accurate and Efficient Pedicle Screw Placement?三维打印加椎弓根导板技术在重度先天性脊柱侧凸中的应用是否有助于准确、高效地置入椎弓根螺钉?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Aug;477(8):1904-1912. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000739.
7
Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.影像引导脊柱手术中单次多级配准的准确性。
Spine J. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):263-7; discussion 268. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.048.
8
Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.机器人辅助与透视引导下椎弓根螺钉置入治疗脊柱转移性疾病:配对队列比较
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1710.
9
Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine using a conventional intraoperative fluoroscopy-guided technique: a national neurosurgical education and training center analysis of 1236 consecutive screws.传统术中透视引导技术在胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入中的准确性:国家神经外科研教培训中心对 1236 枚连续螺钉的分析。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;82(5):866-71.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.023. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
10
Transpedicular screw placement: image-guided versus lateral-view fluoroscopy: in vitro simulation.经椎弓根螺钉置入:图像引导与侧位透视荧光镜检查:体外模拟
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):2160-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00024.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-Guided Spine Surgery: Implementation of a System in Routine Clinical Practice-An Update.机器人引导脊柱手术:常规临床实践中一个系统的实施——最新进展
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):4463. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134463.
2
Scoping review of robotics technology in spinal surgery with highlights of the Annual Seattle Science Foundation Course.脊柱手术中机器人技术的综述及西雅图科学基金会年度课程亮点
Ann Transl Med. 2024 Dec 24;12(6):118. doi: 10.21037/atm-24-100. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Assessment of trabecular bone Hounsfield units in the lumbar spine for osteoporosis evaluation in individuals aged 65 and above: a review.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgeons' Learning Curve of Renaissance Robotic Surgical System.文艺复兴时期机器人手术系统外科医生的学习曲线
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):818-823. doi: 10.14444/7116. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends.机器人辅助脊柱手术:历史、疗效、成本及未来趋势。
Robot Surg. 2019 Nov 7;6:9-23. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S190720. eCollection 2019.
3
Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-assisted Technique Versus Conventional Freehand Technique in Spine Surgery From Nine Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-analysis.
评估65岁及以上人群腰椎小梁骨亨氏单位以进行骨质疏松症评估:综述
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Feb;36(2):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07340-w. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
4
Development of a software system for surgical robots based on multimodal image fusion: study protocol.基于多模态图像融合的手术机器人软件系统开发:研究方案
Front Surg. 2024 Jun 6;11:1389244. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1389244. eCollection 2024.
5
Spine Surgical Robotics: Current Status and Recent Clinical Applications.脊柱外科机器人技术:现状与近期临床应用
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1256-1271. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346610.305. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
6
Three-Dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Pedicle Screw Accuracy in Clinical Utilization of a New Robotic System in Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Study.新型机器人系统在脊柱手术临床应用中椎弓根螺钉准确性的三维定量评估:一项多中心研究
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):1028-1039. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346552.276. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
基于 9 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析:机器人辅助技术与传统徒手技术在脊柱手术中椎弓根螺钉置钉准确性和临床结果的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jan 15;45(2):E111-E119. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003193.
4
Evaluation of the ROSA™ Spine robot for minimally invasive surgical procedures.用于微创手术的ROSA™脊柱机器人的评估。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Oct;13(10):899-906. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1236680. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with the ROSA(TM) Spine robot and intraoperative flat-panel CT guidance.使用ROSA(TM)脊柱机器人及术中平板CT引导的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jun;158(6):1125-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2799-z. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
Unskilled unawareness and the learning curve in robotic spine surgery.机器人脊柱手术中的非熟练无意识状态与学习曲线
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Oct;157(10):1819-23; discussion 1823. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2535-0. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Scoliosis Surgery: A Comparison between Conventional Computed Tomography-Based and O-Arm-Based Navigation Techniques.脊柱侧弯手术中椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性:基于传统计算机断层扫描与基于O型臂导航技术的比较
Asian Spine J. 2014 Jun;8(3):331-8. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.331. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
8
The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems.术中影像导航系统辅助下椎弓根螺钉置钉的准确性。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Feb;20(2):196-203. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13413. Epub 2013 Dec 20.