The Program in Conflict Resolution and Mediation, School of Social and Policy Studies, Tel Aviv University.
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1525-1540. doi: 10.1177/17456916211058090. Epub 2022 May 17.
A large portion of research in the social sciences is devoted to using interventions to combat societal and social problems, such as prejudice, discrimination, and intergroup conflict. However, these interventions are often developed using the theories and/or intuitions of the individuals who developed them and evaluated in isolation without comparing their efficacy with other interventions. Here, we make the case for an experimental design that addresses such issues: an intervention tournament-that is, a study that compares several different interventions against a single control and uses the same standardized outcome measures during assessment and participants drawn from the same population. We begin by highlighting the utility of intervention tournaments as an approach that complements other, more commonly used approaches to addressing societal issues. We then describe various approaches to intervention tournaments, which include crowdsourced, curated, and in-house-developed intervention tournaments, and their unique characteristics. Finally, we discuss practical recommendations and key design insights for conducting such research, given the existing literature. These include considerations of intervention-tournament deployment, characteristics of included interventions, statistical analysis and reporting, study design, longitudinal and underlying psychological mechanism assessment, and theoretical ramifications.
社会科学领域的很大一部分研究致力于利用干预措施来解决社会和社会问题,如偏见、歧视和群体间冲突。然而,这些干预措施通常是由开发它们的个人根据他们的理论和/或直觉开发的,并在没有与其他干预措施进行比较的情况下进行单独评估。在这里,我们提出了一种实验设计来解决这些问题:干预锦标赛,即一项研究,它将几种不同的干预措施与单一的对照进行比较,并在评估过程中使用相同的标准化结果衡量标准,参与者来自同一人群。我们首先强调了干预锦标赛作为一种方法的效用,这种方法补充了其他更常用的解决社会问题的方法。然后,我们描述了各种干预锦标赛的方法,包括众包、策划和内部开发的干预锦标赛,以及它们的独特特征。最后,鉴于现有文献,我们讨论了进行此类研究的实际建议和关键设计见解,包括干预锦标赛部署、包含的干预措施的特征、统计分析和报告、研究设计、纵向和潜在心理机制评估以及理论影响。