• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intervention Tournaments: An Overview of Concept, Design, and Implementation.干预锦标赛:概念、设计与实施概述。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1525-1540. doi: 10.1177/17456916211058090. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
5
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
Getting along to get ahead: The role of social context in tournament promotion and reward systems.和谐共赢:社会环境在竞赛晋升和奖励制度中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257389. eCollection 2021.
8
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
9
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
10
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma.减少与心理健康相关污名化的大众媒体干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 23;2013(7):CD009453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009453.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Spanish Version of the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS-E): Factorial Structure and Scale Invariance in Spanish Adolescents.《日常歧视量表(西班牙语版)(EDS-E):西班牙青少年的因子结构与量表不变性》
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 22;14(9):2887. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092887.
2
Behavioral interventions motivate action to address climate change.行为干预促使人们采取行动应对气候变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 20;122(20):e2426768122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2426768122. Epub 2025 May 13.
3
Politically-targeted intergroup interventions promote social equality and engagement.针对政治目标的群体间干预措施可促进社会平等与参与。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 23;3(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00228-3.
4
How to design and conduct a megastudy.如何设计与开展一项大型研究。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2257-2260. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01998-2.
5
Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation.个体层面干预网络错误信息工具箱。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1044-1052. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01881-0. Epub 2024 May 13.
6
How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations.如何构建大型团队科学:大规模合作实用指南
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):230235. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230235. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Interventions to Modify Psychological Well-Being: Progress, Promises, and an Agenda for Future Research.改善心理健康的干预措施:进展、前景及未来研究议程
Affect Sci. 2023 Mar 3;4(1):174-184. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00167-w. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science.大团队科学的益处、障碍和风险。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 May;18(3):607-623. doi: 10.1177/17456916221082970. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
2
Exposure to a media intervention helps promote support for peace in Colombia.接触媒体干预有助于促进哥伦比亚对和平的支持。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;6(6):847-857. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01330-w. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans' support for partisan violence.纠正不准确的元感知会降低美国人对党派暴力的支持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 19;119(16):e2116851119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116851119. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of two ways of delivering guided self-help for people with an eating disorder: A multi-arm randomized controlled trial.两种方式提供进食障碍自助指导的临床效果和成本效益:一项多臂随机对照试验。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Jul;54(7):1224-1237. doi: 10.1002/eat.23554. Epub 2021 May 17.
5
Accelerated vaccine rollout is imperative to mitigate highly transmissible COVID-19 variants.加快疫苗接种对于减轻高传染性的新冠病毒变异毒株的影响至关重要。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May;35:100865. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100865. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
6
A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor's appointment.一项针对基于文本的提示进行的大规模研究,旨在鼓励患者在即将到来的医生预约时接种疫苗。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 18;118(20). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101165118.
7
The general fault in our fault lines.我们断层线上的普遍故障。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1369-1380. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Understanding and combating misperceived polarization.理解和应对被误解的极化现象。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200143. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Dementia stigma reduction (DESeRvE) through education and virtual contact in the general public: A multi-arm factorial randomised controlled trial.通过教育和公众中的虚拟接触减少痴呆症污名(DESeRvE):一项多臂因子随机对照试验。
Dementia (London). 2021 Aug;20(6):2152-2169. doi: 10.1177/1471301220987374. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
10
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.mRNA-1273 新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

干预锦标赛:概念、设计与实施概述。

Intervention Tournaments: An Overview of Concept, Design, and Implementation.

机构信息

The Program in Conflict Resolution and Mediation, School of Social and Policy Studies, Tel Aviv University.

Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1525-1540. doi: 10.1177/17456916211058090. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.1177/17456916211058090
PMID:35580273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9634285/
Abstract

A large portion of research in the social sciences is devoted to using interventions to combat societal and social problems, such as prejudice, discrimination, and intergroup conflict. However, these interventions are often developed using the theories and/or intuitions of the individuals who developed them and evaluated in isolation without comparing their efficacy with other interventions. Here, we make the case for an experimental design that addresses such issues: an intervention tournament-that is, a study that compares several different interventions against a single control and uses the same standardized outcome measures during assessment and participants drawn from the same population. We begin by highlighting the utility of intervention tournaments as an approach that complements other, more commonly used approaches to addressing societal issues. We then describe various approaches to intervention tournaments, which include crowdsourced, curated, and in-house-developed intervention tournaments, and their unique characteristics. Finally, we discuss practical recommendations and key design insights for conducting such research, given the existing literature. These include considerations of intervention-tournament deployment, characteristics of included interventions, statistical analysis and reporting, study design, longitudinal and underlying psychological mechanism assessment, and theoretical ramifications.

摘要

社会科学领域的很大一部分研究致力于利用干预措施来解决社会和社会问题,如偏见、歧视和群体间冲突。然而,这些干预措施通常是由开发它们的个人根据他们的理论和/或直觉开发的,并在没有与其他干预措施进行比较的情况下进行单独评估。在这里,我们提出了一种实验设计来解决这些问题:干预锦标赛,即一项研究,它将几种不同的干预措施与单一的对照进行比较,并在评估过程中使用相同的标准化结果衡量标准,参与者来自同一人群。我们首先强调了干预锦标赛作为一种方法的效用,这种方法补充了其他更常用的解决社会问题的方法。然后,我们描述了各种干预锦标赛的方法,包括众包、策划和内部开发的干预锦标赛,以及它们的独特特征。最后,鉴于现有文献,我们讨论了进行此类研究的实际建议和关键设计见解,包括干预锦标赛部署、包含的干预措施的特征、统计分析和报告、研究设计、纵向和潜在心理机制评估以及理论影响。