Department of Finance, University of Ghana Business School, Accra, Ghana.
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024570118.
Ethics in social science experimentation and data collection are often discussed but rarely articulated in writing as part of research outputs. Although papers typically reference human subjects research approvals from relevant institutional review boards, most recognize that such boards do not carry out comprehensive ethical assessments. We propose a structured ethics appendix to provide details on the following: policy equipoise, role of the researcher, potential harms to participants and nonparticipants, conflicts of interest, intellectual freedom, feedback to participants, and foreseeable misuse of research results. We discuss each of these and some of the norms and challenging situations of each. We believe that discussing such issues explicitly in appendices of papers, even if briefly, will serve two purposes: more complete communication of ethics can improve discussions of papers and can clarify and improve the norms themselves.
社会科学实验和数据收集的伦理道德经常被讨论,但很少以书面形式作为研究成果的一部分进行阐述。尽管论文通常会参考相关机构审查委员会对人体研究的批准,但大多数人都认识到,这些委员会并没有进行全面的伦理评估。我们提出了一个结构化的伦理附录,以提供以下方面的详细信息:政策均衡、研究人员的角色、对参与者和非参与者的潜在伤害、利益冲突、知识自由、向参与者反馈以及研究结果的可预见滥用。我们讨论了每一个方面,以及其中一些规范和具有挑战性的情况。我们认为,即使只是简要地在论文附录中讨论这些问题,也将有两个目的:更完整地传达伦理学可以改进论文的讨论,并可以澄清和改进规范本身。