Gibb I
J Clin Pathol. 1987 Mar;40(3):298-301. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.3.298.
Overall laboratory reproducibility for the Ames Seralyzer and plasma potassium test strips was less than 4% within the plasma reference range; and linearity extended from 2.1 to 10.2 mmol/l. Neither bilirubin nor lipaemia interfered in the analysis and selectivity for potassium over sodium was 450:1. Laboratory comparison with automated flame photometry and an indirect ion selective electrode showed a Seralyzer bias of +0.10 (+/- 25D 0.26) and +0.11 (0.27) mmol/l. Against flame photometry, comparison of analyses by six doctors from a coronary care unit and four nurses from a renal dialysis unit showed smaller positive biases (0.06 and 0.02 mmol/l) but substantially larger error ranges (0.43 and 0.55 mmol/l, respectively). Some 49% of the nurses' and 37% of the doctors' results differed from laboratory values by more than 0.2 mmol/l. Potassium test strip results proved acceptably comparable and reproducible when produced by an experienced analyst, but greater variability in clinical hands rendered the system unsuitable for precise monitoring of potassium concentration.
在血浆参考范围内,Ames Seralyzer和血浆钾测试条的总体实验室重现性小于4%;线性范围从2.1至10.2毫摩尔/升。胆红素和脂血均不干扰分析,钾对钠的选择性为450:1。与自动火焰光度法和间接离子选择电极进行的实验室比较显示,Seralyzer的偏差为+0.10(±25D 0.26)和+0.11(0.27)毫摩尔/升。与火焰光度法相比,冠心病监护病房的六名医生和肾透析病房的四名护士进行的分析比较显示,正偏差较小(分别为0.06和0.02毫摩尔/升),但误差范围大得多(分别为0.43和0.55毫摩尔/升)。约49%的护士和37%的医生的结果与实验室值相差超过0.2毫摩尔/升。当由经验丰富的分析人员操作时,钾测试条的结果证明具有可接受的可比性和重现性,但在临床操作中变异性更大,使得该系统不适用于精确监测钾浓度。