Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2022 Oct;45(10):1887-1897. doi: 10.1007/s40618-022-01820-8. Epub 2022 May 19.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdowns have impacted on management of osteoporosis and the use of telemedicine is increasingly widespread albeit supported by little evidence so far. The aim of the study is to assess adherence to denosumab and incidence of non-traumatic fractures during the lockdown compared to the pre-COVID-19 year and to explore the effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of osteoporotic patients.
Retrospective, longitudinal, single-center study on patients receiving subcutaneous denosumab therapy every 6 months. Each patient was scheduled to undergo 2 visits: one during the pre-COVID-19 period (March 2019-March 2020) and another visit during the lockdown period (March 2020-March 2021). Data on new fractures, adherence, risk factors for osteoporosis and the modality of visit (telemedicine or face-to-face) were collected.
The prevalence of non-adherent patients was higher during the lockdown (35 of 269 patients, 13.0%) than the pre-COVID-19 period (9 of 276 patients, 3.3%) (p < 0.0001). During the lockdown, the number of new non-traumatic fractures was higher than the pre-COVID-19 year (p < 0.0001): 10 patients out of 269 (3.7%) experienced a fragility fracture and 2 patients (0.7%) a probable rebound fracture during the lockdown period, whereas no patient had fragility/rebound fractures during the pre-COVID-19 period. No difference was found in the prevalence of non-adherence and new non-traumatic fractures comparing patients evaluated with tele-medicine to those evaluated with face-to-face visit.
Non-adherent patients and new non-traumatic fractures (including rebound fractures) were more prevalent during the lockdown in comparison to the pre-COVID-19 period, regardless of the modality of medical evaluation.
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)封锁对骨质疏松症的治疗产生了影响,尽管目前证据有限,但远程医疗的使用越来越广泛。本研究旨在评估与 COVID-19 之前的年份相比,封锁期间地舒单抗的使用情况以及非创伤性骨折的发生率,并探讨远程医疗在骨质疏松症患者管理中的有效性。
这是一项回顾性、纵向、单中心研究,纳入了每 6 个月接受皮下注射地舒单抗治疗的患者。每位患者都计划接受 2 次就诊:一次在 COVID-19 之前的时期(2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月),另一次在封锁期间(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月)。收集了新骨折、依从性、骨质疏松症危险因素以及就诊方式(远程医疗或面对面)的数据。
在封锁期间(269 例患者中有 35 例,13.0%),不依从的患者比例高于 COVID-19 之前的时期(276 例患者中有 9 例,3.3%)(p<0.0001)。在封锁期间,新发生的非创伤性骨折数量高于 COVID-19 之前的年份(p<0.0001):269 例患者中有 10 例(3.7%)发生脆性骨折,2 例(0.7%)发生可能的反弹骨折,而在 COVID-19 之前的时期没有患者发生脆性/反弹骨折。比较远程医疗评估的患者和面对面就诊的患者,在不依从和新发生非创伤性骨折(包括反弹骨折)的发生率方面没有差异。
与 COVID-19 之前的时期相比,无论医疗评估方式如何,在封锁期间,不依从的患者和新发生的非创伤性骨折(包括反弹骨折)更为常见。