• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从意义建构视角探究失败规避对从项目失败中学习的影响

Exploring the Influence of Failure Aversion on Learning From Project Failure: A Sensemaking Perspective.

作者信息

Zhang Liangting, Wang Bin, Feng Xiaoxia, Zhang Yue, Wang Wenzhou

机构信息

Management School, Hainan University, Haikou, China.

School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:794390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794390. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794390
PMID:35592145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9110797/
Abstract

Although project failure is commonly considered a negative event, it can provide valuable resources for learning. Despite well documented research on the antecedents of learning from project failure at the individual level, individuals' attitude toward failures, a relatively proximal antecedent of learning from failure, has attracted limited attention in organizational studies. To address this paucity of research, based on the sensemaking theory, in the current study we specifically focused on individuals' failure aversion and explored how it would influence learning from failure through the process of arguing and expectation. Using a sample of 774 employees from R&D teams in China, our findings revealed that individuals' failure aversion enhanced their learning from failure through inducing a loss-focused coping, but failure aversion negatively affected learning from failure through increasing the individuals' perceived loss of self-esteem. We also found that individuals' learning goal orientation (LGO) weakened the negative relationship between the loss of self-esteem and learning from failure; however, LGO did not moderate our hypothesized relationship between loss-focused coping and learning from failure. Our study extends the literature on learning from failure in two ways. First, it explores the learning from failure process at the individual level based on the sensemaking theory and second, it sheds light on the underlying cognitive mechanisms operating between failure aversion and learning from project failure.

摘要

尽管项目失败通常被视为负面事件,但它能提供宝贵的学习资源。尽管在个体层面上,关于从项目失败中学习的前因已有大量研究,但个体对失败的态度,作为从失败中学习的一个相对较直接的前因,在组织研究中受到的关注有限。为了弥补这一研究不足,基于意义建构理论,在本研究中我们特别关注个体的失败厌恶,并探讨它如何通过论证和期望过程影响从失败中学习。以来自中国研发团队的774名员工为样本,我们的研究结果表明,个体的失败厌恶通过引发以损失为重点的应对方式来增强他们从失败中学习的能力,但失败厌恶通过增加个体感知到的自尊丧失对从失败中学习产生负面影响。我们还发现,个体的学习目标导向(LGO)削弱了自尊丧失与从失败中学习之间的负向关系;然而,LGO并没有调节我们假设的以损失为重点的应对与从失败中学习之间的关系。我们的研究从两个方面扩展了关于从失败中学习的文献。第一,它基于意义建构理论在个体层面探索从失败中学习的过程,第二,它揭示了失败厌恶与从项目失败中学习之间潜在的认知机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4274/9110797/66e4cdf662f7/fpsyg-13-794390-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4274/9110797/2c31e59981a8/fpsyg-13-794390-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4274/9110797/66e4cdf662f7/fpsyg-13-794390-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4274/9110797/2c31e59981a8/fpsyg-13-794390-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4274/9110797/66e4cdf662f7/fpsyg-13-794390-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Influence of Failure Aversion on Learning From Project Failure: A Sensemaking Perspective.从意义建构视角探究失败规避对从项目失败中学习的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:794390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794390. eCollection 2022.
2
When Error Learning Orientation Leads to Learning From Project Failure: The Moderating Role of Fear of Face Loss.当错误学习导向导致从项目失败中学习时:面子丧失恐惧的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 13;10:1317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01317. eCollection 2019.
3
Are You Dominated by Your Affects? How and When Do Employees' Daily Affective States Impact Learning from Project Failure?你是否受情感左右?员工的日常情感状态如何以及何时会影响从项目失败中学习?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(6):514. doi: 10.3390/bs13060514.
4
Making sense of health information technology implementation: A qualitative study protocol.理解健康信息技术实施:一项定性研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 29;5:95. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-95.
5
Proximal antecedents and correlates of adopted error approach: a self-regulatory perspective.采用错误法的近端前因及其相关性:自我调节视角。
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):428-51. doi: 10.1080/00224540903366743.
6
When Learning Goal Orientation Leads to Learning From Failure: The Roles of Negative Emotion Coping Orientation and Positive Grieving.当学习目标导向促成从失败中学习时:负面情绪应对导向与积极悲伤的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 29;12:608256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.608256. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring interpersonal behavior and team sensemaking during health information technology implementation.探索健康信息技术实施过程中的人际行为和团队意义建构。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2013;14:119-44. doi: 10.1108/s1474-8231(2013)00000140010.
8
Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion.像交易者一样思考会有选择地降低个体的损失厌恶。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5035-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806761106. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
9
Dimensionalized goal orientation, innovation climate, and knowledge sharing behavior in higher education research teams.高等教育研究团队中的维度化目标导向、创新氛围与知识共享行为
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 19;10(7):e27853. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27853. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
10
Shame on You! When and Why Failure-Induced Shame Impedes Employees' Learning From Failure in the Chinese Context.你真丢脸!在中国背景下,失败引发的羞耻感何时以及为何会阻碍员工从失败中学习。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 6;12:725277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725277. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsible leadership and employee creativity: a moderated mediation model based on social cognitive and situational strength theories.负责任的领导与员工创造力:基于社会认知和情境强度理论的调节中介模型
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 9;13(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03110-3.
2
The dark and bright side of laissez-faire leadership: Does subordinates' goal orientation make a difference?自由放任式领导的阴暗面与光明面:下属的目标导向会产生影响吗?
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1077357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1077357. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of current failures on predicted well-being for future success: Different mechanisms of action in high and low self-threat situations.

本文引用的文献

1
Action errors, error management, and learning in organizations.组织中的动作错误、错误管理和学习。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:661-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
2
Loss attention in a dual-task setting.在双重任务设置中注意力丧失。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):494-502. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510725. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
3
Loss-aversion or loss-attention: the impact of losses on cognitive performance.损失规避或损失注意:损失对认知表现的影响。
当前失败对未来成功预期幸福感的影响:高自我威胁和低自我威胁情境下的不同作用机制。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:954583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954583. eCollection 2022.
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Mar;66(2):212-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
4
Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison.他人报告的反生产工作行为是否比自我报告提供了更多的增量贡献?一项元分析比较。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 May;97(3):613-36. doi: 10.1037/a0026739. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
5
Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.整合调节与中介作用的方法:一种使用调节路径分析的通用分析框架。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1.
6
Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: a two-study replication.组织错误管理文化及其对绩效的影响:一项双研究复现
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1228-40. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228.
7
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
8
Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance.核心自我评价与目标设定、动机和绩效的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1270-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1270.
9
Contingencies of self-worth.自我价值的偶然性。
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):593-623. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.593.
10
Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.资源守恒:一种对压力进行概念化的新尝试。
Am Psychol. 1989 Mar;44(3):513-24. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513.