School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, No. 15 North Third Ring Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71400-71411. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19901-9. Epub 2022 May 21.
This paper explores the nonlinear relationship between poverty and CO emissions based on the panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2005 to 2019. In this study, the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model is first used. Findings confirm that poverty has a negative impact on CO emissions in the short run and a positive impact in the long run, while both effects of inclusive finance on CO emissions are negative. In order to explore the reasons for the change in the coefficient of poverty, we introduce a moderating effect (ME) model and a dynamic panel threshold (DPT) model. The result shows that the negative effect of poverty on CO emissions diminishes with the moderation of inclusive finance. When inclusive finance crosses the threshold value (IFI = 0.2696), the impact of poverty on CO emissions will change from negative to positive gradually, which verifies the applicability of the "Poverty-CO Paradox" in China and provides an empirical basis for breaking the "Poverty-CO Paradox." Consequently, deepening poverty reduction and pushing the region's inclusive finance to the threshold level are proposed as effective ways to promote CO emission reduction.
本文基于 2005-2019 年中国 30 个省份的面板数据,探讨了贫困与 CO 排放之间的非线性关系。本研究首先采用自回归分布滞后(ARDL)模型。研究结果证实,短期内贫困对 CO 排放有负面影响,长期内有正面影响,而普惠金融对 CO 排放的两个影响均为负。为了探究贫困系数变化的原因,我们引入了调节效应(ME)模型和动态面板门槛(DPT)模型。结果表明,随着普惠金融的调节,贫困对 CO 排放的负面影响逐渐减弱。当普惠金融跨越门槛值(IFI=0.2696)时,贫困对 CO 排放的影响将逐渐由负转正,验证了中国“贫困-CO 悖论”的适用性,为破解“贫困-CO 悖论”提供了实证依据。因此,提出深化减贫和推动区域普惠金融达到门槛水平是促进 CO 减排的有效途径。