University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;13(4):e1602. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1602. Epub 2022 May 23.
The recent exchange about implicit attitudes is an acute reminder of the need to pay research attention to the correlation between implicit attitudes and overt behavior. Current implicit measures are excellent to detect evaluatively relevant associations arising from specific and variable internal states and predict judgments when people lack the motivation and ability to control those judgments. However, there is no convincing evidence of a strong correlation between such implicit attitudes and overt behavior when people's ability and motivation to control the influence of these attitudes is low. Researchers should improve implicit measures by better integrating action, target, level, and context into the measurement procedures and then reexamine if these improved measures predict socially undesirable behaviors when ability and motivation to control behavior are low. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Theory and Methods Neuroscience > Behavior Neuroscience > Cognition.
最近关于内隐态度的交流清楚地提醒我们，有必要关注内隐态度与外显行为之间的相关性。目前的内隐测量方法非常出色，可以检测出特定且可变的内部状态产生的与评价相关的关联，并在人们缺乏控制这些判断的动机和能力时预测判断。然而，当人们控制这些态度影响的能力和动机较低时，并没有令人信服的证据表明这种内隐态度与外显行为之间存在很强的相关性。研究人员应该通过更好地将行动、目标、水平和背景整合到测量程序中，来改进内隐测量方法，然后重新检验这些改进后的方法在人们控制行为的能力和动机较低时，是否可以预测出不良的社会行为。本文属于以下分类：心理学 > 理论和方法 神经科学 > 行为 神经科学 > 认知。
