Department of Philosophy, John Jay College of Criminal Justice/City University of New York, New York.
Department of Philosophy, California State Polytechnic University Pomona, Pomona, California.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;10(5):e1501. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1501. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
We identify several ongoing debates related to implicit measures, surveying prominent views and considerations in each. First, we summarize the debate regarding whether performance on implicit measures is explained by conscious or unconscious representations. Second, we discuss the cognitive structure of the operative constructs: are they associatively or propositionally structured? Third, we review debates about whether performance on implicit measures reflects traits or states. Fourth, we discuss the question of whether a person's performance on an implicit measure reflects characteristics of the person who is taking the test or characteristics of the situation in which the person is taking the test. Finally, we survey the debate about the relationship between implicit measures and (other kinds of) behavior. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Representation Psychology > Theory and Methods Psychology > Prediction Philosophy > Psychological Capacities.
我们确定了与内隐测量相关的几个正在进行的争论，并对每个争论进行了调查，概述了突出的观点和考虑因素。首先，我们总结了关于内隐测量表现是否由意识或无意识的表现来解释的争论。其次，我们讨论了操作结构的认知结构：它们是联想性的还是命题性的？第三，我们回顾了关于内隐测量表现是否反映特质或状态的争论。第四，我们讨论了一个人在内隐测量上的表现是否反映了测试者的特征还是测试者所处环境的特征的问题。最后，我们调查了内隐测量与（其他种类的）行为之间关系的争论。本文属于以下类别：哲学>表象心理学>理论与方法心理学>预测哲学>心理能力。
