Neally Sam J, Tamura Kosuke, Langerman Steven D, Claudel Sophie E, Farmer Nicole, Vijayakumar Nithya P, Curlin Kaveri, Andrews Marcus R, Ceasar Joniqua N, Baumer Yvonne, Powell-Wiley Tiffany M
Social Determinants of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Laboratory, Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Neighborhood Social and Geospatial Determinants of Health Disparities Laboratory, Population and Community Health Sciences Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 May 1;18:101111. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101111. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage may contribute to depression. This study examined associations between neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, measured as deprivation, and depression severity within a broadly representative sample of the U.S. adult population. The sample (n = 6308 U.S. adults) was from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Neighborhood deprivation was calculated using the 2010 U.S. Census and shown in tertile form. Depression severity was calculated from responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as a continuous depression severity score and binary Clinically Relevant Depression (CRD). Multilevel modeling estimated the relationship between deprivation and depression (reference = low deprivation). Models were additionally stratified by gender and race/ethnicity. U.S. adults living in high deprivation neighborhoods were more likely to have a higher PHQ-9 score (p < 0.0001). In unadjusted models, living in high deprivation neighborhoods associated with higher PHQ-9 (β = 0.89, SE = 0.15, p < 0.0001) and higher odds of CRD (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.20-1.51). Living in medium deprivation neighborhoods associated with higher PHQ-9 (β = 0.49, SE = 0.16, p = 0.0019). Associations between deprivation and depression severity lost significance after adjusting for individual-level SES. The results suggest that, for U.S. adults, the relationship between neighborhood-level disadvantage and depression may be attenuated by individual-level SES.
社区社会经济劣势可能导致抑郁。本研究在美国成年人口的广泛代表性样本中,考察了以贫困程度衡量的社区社会经济劣势与抑郁严重程度之间的关联。样本(n = 6308名美国成年人)来自2011 - 2014年国家健康和营养检查调查。社区贫困程度使用2010年美国人口普查数据计算得出,并以三分位数形式呈现。抑郁严重程度根据患者健康问卷 - 9(PHQ - 9)的回答计算得出,作为连续的抑郁严重程度评分和二元临床相关抑郁(CRD)。多水平模型估计了贫困程度与抑郁之间的关系(参照 = 低贫困程度)。模型还按性别和种族/族裔进行了分层。居住在高贫困社区的美国成年人更有可能有较高的PHQ - 9评分(p < 0.0001)。在未调整的模型中,居住在高贫困社区与较高的PHQ - 9(β = 0.89,SE = 0.15,p < 0.0001)和较高的CRD几率(OR = 1.35,95% CI = 1.20 - 1.51)相关。居住在中等贫困社区与较高的PHQ - 9相关(β = 0.49,SE = 0.16,p = 0.0019)。在调整个体层面的社会经济地位后,贫困程度与抑郁严重程度之间的关联失去了显著性。结果表明,对于美国成年人来说,社区层面的劣势与抑郁之间的关系可能会被个体层面的社会经济地位所减弱。