Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Nat Commun. 2022 May 24;13(1):2886. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30366-9.
Historically, mothers producing twins gave birth, on average, more often than non-twinners. This observation has been interpreted as twinners having higher intrinsic fertility - a tendency to conceive easily irrespective of age and other factors - which has shaped both hypotheses about why twinning persists and varies across populations, and the design of medical studies on female fertility. Here we show in >20k pre-industrial European mothers that this interpretation results from an ecological fallacy: twinners had more births not due to higher intrinsic fertility, but because mothers that gave birth more accumulated more opportunities to produce twins. Controlling for variation in the exposure to the risk of twinning reveals that mothers with higher twinning propensity - a physiological predisposition to producing twins - had fewer births, and when twin mortality was high, fewer offspring reaching adulthood. Twinning rates may thus be driven by variation in its mortality costs, rather than variation in intrinsic fertility.
从历史上看,平均而言,生产双胞胎的母亲比非双胞胎母亲更频繁地分娩。这一观察结果被解释为双胞胎具有更高的内在生育能力——一种无论年龄和其他因素都容易怀孕的倾向——这不仅塑造了关于为什么双胞胎会持续存在以及在不同人群中存在差异的假说,还影响了关于女性生育能力的医学研究的设计。在这里,我们在 >20k 名前工业化欧洲母亲中表明,这种解释源于生态谬误:双胞胎的生育次数更多不是因为内在生育能力更高,而是因为生育次数更多的母亲积累了更多生育双胞胎的机会。控制双胞胎风险暴露的变化表明,具有更高双胞胎倾向的母亲(即产生双胞胎的生理倾向)生育的孩子更少,而且当双胞胎死亡率较高时,成年后代更少。因此,双胞胎的出生率可能是由其死亡率成本的变化而不是内在生育能力的变化所驱动的。