Suppr超能文献

脾切除术与影像引导经皮引流治疗脾脓肿:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Splenectomy versus Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Drainage for Splenic Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Jun;23(5):417-429. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.072. Epub 2022 May 24.

Abstract

Splenic abscess (SA) is a rare, life-threatening illness that is generally treated with splenectomy. However, this is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Recently, percutaneous drainage (PD) has emerged as an alternative therapy in select patients. In this study, we compare mortality and complications in patients with SA treated with splenectomy versus PD. A systematic literature search of 13 databases and online search engines was conducted from 2019 to 2020. A bivariate generalized linear mixed model (BGLMM) was used to conduct a separate meta-analysis for both mortality and complications. We used the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to evaluate risk of bias in non-randomized studies, and the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach for assessing quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Results were presented according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review included 46 retrospective studies from 21 countries. For mortality rate, 27 studies compared splenectomy and PD whereas 10 used PD only and nine used splenectomy only. Data for major complications were available in 18 two-arm studies, seven single-arm studies with PD, and seven single-arm studies with splenectomy. Of a total of 589 patients, 288 were treated with splenectomy and 301 underwent PD. Mortality rate was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-17%) in patients undergoing splenectomy compared with 8% (95% CI, 4%-13%) with PD. Complication rates were 26% (95% CI, 16%-37%) in the splenectomy group compared with 10% (95% CI, 4%-17%) in the PD group. Percutaneous drainage s associated with a trend toward lower complications and mortality rates compared with splenectomy in the treatment of SA, however, these findings were not statistically significant. Because of the heterogeneity of the data, further prospective studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

摘要

脾脓肿(SA)是一种罕见的、危及生命的疾病,通常采用脾切除术治疗。然而,这种方法与较高的死亡率和发病率相关。最近,经皮引流(PD)已成为某些患者的替代治疗方法。在本研究中,我们比较了采用脾切除术与 PD 治疗 SA 的患者的死亡率和并发症。

从 2019 年至 2020 年,我们对 13 个数据库和在线搜索引擎进行了系统的文献检索。使用双变量广义线性混合模型(BGLMM)对死亡率和并发症分别进行了单独的荟萃分析。我们使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具来评估非随机研究的偏倚风险,并使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法来评估证据质量和推荐强度。结果根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南呈现。

该综述纳入了来自 21 个国家的 46 项回顾性研究。对于死亡率,有 27 项研究比较了脾切除术和 PD,10 项研究仅采用 PD,9 项研究仅采用脾切除术。在 18 项两臂研究、7 项单臂 PD 研究和 7 项单臂脾切除术研究中,有主要并发症的数据。在总共 589 名患者中,288 名接受了脾切除术,301 名接受了 PD。脾切除术组的死亡率为 12%(95%可信区间 [CI],8%-17%),PD 组为 8%(95% CI,4%-13%)。脾切除术组的并发症发生率为 26%(95% CI,16%-37%),PD 组为 10%(95% CI,4%-17%)。

与脾切除术相比,经皮引流与 SA 治疗中的并发症和死亡率降低趋势相关,但这些发现无统计学意义。由于数据的异质性,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来得出明确的结论。

相似文献

5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.深静脉血栓形成的家庭治疗与住院治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;1(1):CD003076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003076.pub3.

引用本文的文献

3
Man with left-sided flank pain.左侧胁腹疼痛的男性。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Oct 16;5(5):e13326. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13326. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Conservative Management of a Rare Contiguously Spread Splenic Abscess.罕见连续性播散性脾脓肿的保守治疗
Cureus. 2023 Dec 18;15(12):e50747. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50747. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Complications Of Image-Guided Drainage.影像引导下引流的并发症
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Aug 21;120(33-34):553-554. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0140.
9
Splenic injury from blunt trauma.钝性创伤所致脾损伤
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1035-1038. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad060.
10
Splenic abscess secondary to COVID-19 infection - A case report.新型冠状病毒肺炎感染继发脾脓肿——病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Dec;101:107807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107807. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

3
Splenic Abscess: An Uncommon Entity with Potentially Life-Threatening Evolution.脾脓肿:一种罕见且可能危及生命的病症。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2018 Jan 31;2018:8610657. doi: 10.1155/2018/8610657. eCollection 2018.
4
Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.元分析中发表偏倚检验的实证比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1260-1267. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4425-7. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
6
Experience with Splenic Abscess from Southern India.来自印度南部的脾脓肿治疗经验。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Oct;10(10):OC22-OC25. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22108.8628. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
8
Benefits and risks of splenectomy.脾切除术的利弊。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
10
Isolated splenic abscess in children, role of splenic preservation.儿童孤立性脾脓肿,脾脏保留的作用。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Aug;29(8):787-90. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3336-2. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验