回顾性评估与 COVID-19 政策和健康结果相关的因素。
A Retrospective Global Assessment of Factors Associated With COVID-19 Policies and Health Outcomes.
机构信息
School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
出版信息
Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:843445. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843445. eCollection 2022.
BACKGROUND
The 2019 Global Health Security (GHS) Index measured the capacities of countries to prepare for and respond to epidemics and pandemics. However, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that GHS Index scores were poorly correlated with ability to respond to infectious disease threats. It is critical to understand how public health policies may reduce the negative impacts of pandemics.
OBJECTIVE
To identify non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) that can minimize morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 and future pandemics, this study examined associations between country characteristics, NPI public health policies, and COVID-19 outcomes during the first year of the pandemic, prior to the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine. This global analysis describes worldwide trends in policy implementation and generates a stronger understanding of how NPIs contributed to improved health outcomes.
DESIGN
This cross-sectional, retrospective study relied on information drawn from publicly available datasets through December 31, 2020.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES
We conducted multivariate regressions to examine associations between country characteristics and policies, and policies and health outcomes.
RESULTS
Countries with higher health service coverage prior to the pandemic implemented more policies and types of policies. Countries with more bordering countries implemented more border control policies (0.78), and countries with denser populations implemented more masking policies (0.24). Across all countries, fewer COVID-19 cases and deaths per million were associated with masking (-496.10, -7.57), testing and tracing (-108.50, -2.47), and restriction of movement (-102.30, -2.10) policies, with stronger associations when these policies were mandatory rather than voluntary.
CONCLUSIONS
Country characteristics, including health service coverage, number of bordering countries, and population density, may predict the frequency and nature of public health interventions. Countries with higher health service coverage may have the infrastructure to react more efficiently to a pandemic, leading them to implement a greater number of policies. Mandatory masking, testing and tracing, and restriction of movement policies were associated with more favorable COVID-19 population health outcomes. While these results are consistent with existing COVID-19 mathematical models, policy effectiveness depends on how well they are implemented. Our results suggest that social distancing policies were less effective in reducing infectious disease risk, which may reflect difficulties with enforcement and monitoring.
背景
2019 年全球卫生安全(GHS)指数衡量了各国应对传染病和大流行的能力。然而,COVID-19 大流行表明,GHS 指数得分与应对传染病威胁的能力相关性较差。了解公共卫生政策如何减轻大流行的负面影响至关重要。
目的
为了确定在 COVID-19 和未来大流行期间可以最大限度地减少发病率和死亡率的非药物干预措施(NPIs),本研究在 COVID-19 疫苗推出之前,在大流行的第一年期间,检查了国家特征、公共卫生政策与 COVID-19 结果之间的关系。这项全球分析描述了政策实施的全球趋势,并更深入地了解了 NPIs 如何有助于改善健康结果。
设计
这是一项横断面、回顾性研究,依赖于 2020 年 12 月 31 日之前从公开可用数据集提取的信息。
主要和次要结果测量
我们进行了多变量回归,以检查国家特征和政策之间以及政策与健康结果之间的关系。
结果
在大流行之前,卫生服务覆盖范围较高的国家实施了更多的政策和政策类型。与邻国接壤较多的国家实施了更多的边境管制政策(0.78),人口密度较高的国家实施了更多的掩蔽政策(0.24)。在所有国家中,每百万人的 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数较少与掩蔽(-496.10,-7.57)、检测和追踪(-108.50,-2.47)和限制移动(-102.30,-2.10)政策相关,当这些政策是强制性而非自愿性时,关联更强。
结论
国家特征,包括卫生服务覆盖范围、邻国数量和人口密度,可能预测公共卫生干预的频率和性质。卫生服务覆盖范围较高的国家可能拥有更高效应对大流行的基础设施,从而实施更多的政策。强制性掩蔽、检测和追踪以及限制移动政策与更有利的 COVID-19 人口健康结果相关。虽然这些结果与现有的 COVID-19 数学模型一致,但政策的有效性取决于其实施情况。我们的结果表明,社会距离政策在降低传染病风险方面效果较差,这可能反映出执行和监测方面的困难。
相似文献
Front Public Health. 2022
BMJ Glob Health. 2021-6
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022-11
Global Health. 2021-5-20
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-4-21
引用本文的文献
Health Care Sci. 2024-12-18
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024-3-5
Front Public Health. 2023
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-2-27
本文引用的文献
Lancet. 2021-12-11
Lancet Public Health. 2021-3
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021-4