Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):e175-e183. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30308-X. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
In most countries, contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases are asked to quarantine for 14 days after exposure to limit asymptomatic onward transmission. While theoretically effective, this policy places a substantial social and economic burden on both the individual and wider society, which might result in low adherence and reduced policy effectiveness. We aimed to assess the merit of testing contacts to avert onward transmission and to replace or reduce the length of quarantine for uninfected contacts.
We used an agent-based model to simulate the viral load dynamics of exposed contacts, and their potential for onward transmission in different quarantine and testing strategies. We compared the performance of quarantines of differing durations, testing with either PCR or lateral flow antigen (LFA) tests at the end of quarantine, and daily LFA testing without quarantine, against the current 14-day quarantine strategy. We also investigated the effect of contact tracing delays and adherence to both quarantine and self-isolation on the effectiveness of each strategy.
Assuming moderate levels of adherence to quarantine and self-isolation, self-isolation on symptom onset alone can prevent 37% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 12-56) of onward transmission potential from secondary cases. 14 days of post-exposure quarantine reduces transmission by 59% (95% UI 28-79). Quarantine with release after a negative PCR test 7 days after exposure might avert a similar proportion (54%, 95% UI 31-81; risk ratio [RR] 0·94, 95% UI 0·62-1·24) to that of the 14-day quarantine period, as would quarantine with a negative LFA test 7 days after exposure (50%, 95% UI 28-77; RR 0·88, 0·66-1·11) or daily testing without quarantine for 5 days after tracing (50%, 95% UI 23-81; RR 0·88, 0·60-1·43) if all tests are returned negative. A stronger effect might be possible if individuals isolate more strictly after a positive test and if contacts can be notified faster.
Testing might allow for a substantial reduction in the length of, or replacement of, quarantine with a small excess in transmission risk. Decreasing test and trace delays and increasing adherence will further increase the effectiveness of these strategies. Further research is required to empirically evaluate the potential costs (increased transmission risk, false reassurance) and benefits (reduction in the burden of quarantine, increased adherence) of such strategies before adoption as policy.
National Institute for Health Research, UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome Trust, EU Horizon 2021, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
在大多数国家,接触过确诊 COVID-19 病例的人在接触后被要求隔离 14 天,以限制无症状的传播。虽然理论上有效,但这一政策给个人和整个社会带来了巨大的社会和经济负担,可能导致低依从性和降低政策效果。我们旨在评估接触者检测以避免传播的价值,并取代或缩短未感染者的隔离期。
我们使用基于代理的模型来模拟暴露接触者的病毒载量动态及其在不同隔离和检测策略中的潜在传播能力。我们比较了不同持续时间的隔离、在隔离结束时使用 PCR 或侧向流动抗原(LFA)检测进行检测,以及无隔离的每日 LFA 检测与当前 14 天隔离策略的性能。我们还研究了接触者追踪延迟以及对隔离和自我隔离的遵守情况对每种策略效果的影响。
假设对隔离和自我隔离有中等程度的遵守,仅在出现症状时进行自我隔离就可以防止继发性病例的传播潜力增加 37%(95%置信区间 [UI] 12-56)。接触后 14 天的隔离可减少 59%(95% UI 28-79)的传播。在接触后 7 天进行阴性 PCR 检测后解除隔离,可能会避免类似比例(54%,95% UI 31-81;风险比 [RR] 0·94,95% UI 0·62-1·24)的传播,而在接触后 7 天进行阴性 LFA 检测或在追踪后进行 5 天的每日检测而无需隔离(50%,95% UI 28-77;RR 0·88,0·66-1·11)也可以达到同样的效果,如果所有检测结果均为阴性。如果个体在检测结果呈阳性后更严格地隔离,如果能更快地通知接触者,可能会产生更大的效果。
检测可能会大大缩短隔离期,或者用较小的传播风险增加来替代隔离。减少检测和追踪的延迟并提高遵守率将进一步提高这些策略的有效性。在采用这些策略作为政策之前,需要进一步研究以实证评估这些策略的潜在成本(增加的传播风险,错误的保证)和收益(减轻隔离负担,提高遵守率)。
英国国家卫生研究院,英国研究与创新,惠康信托基金会,欧盟地平线 2020 计划以及比尔和梅琳达·盖茨基金会。