• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variation in Global Policy Responses to COVID-19: A Bidirectional Analysis.全球应对 COVID-19 政策的差异:双向分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054252.
2
Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球 204 个国家和地区及 811 个亚级行政区 1990 年至 2021 年 288 种死因及预期寿命的归因分析:全球疾病负担研究 2021 系统分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):2100-2132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Drivers of COVID-19 policy stringency in 175 countries and territories: COVID-19 cases and deaths, gross domestic products per capita, and health expenditures.175 个国家和地区 COVID-19 政策严格程度的驱动因素:COVID-19 病例和死亡人数、人均国内生产总值和卫生支出。
J Glob Health. 2022 Dec 17;12:05049. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05049.
5
Estimating global, regional, and national daily and cumulative infections with SARS-CoV-2 through Nov 14, 2021: a statistical analysis.估算 2021 年 11 月 14 日前全球、区域和国家的 SARS-CoV-2 日感染和累计感染人数:一项统计分析。
Lancet. 2022 Jun 25;399(10344):2351-2380. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00484-6. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家级行政单位 1950 年至 2021 年的全球年龄、性别特异性死亡率、预期寿命和人口估计,以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的综合人口分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):1989-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00476-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
Development of New Stringency Indices for Nonpharmacological Social Distancing Policies Implemented in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Random Forest Approach.韩国在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的非药物性社交隔离政策的新严格指数的制定:随机森林方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 8;10:e47099. doi: 10.2196/47099.
8
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
9
The Interplay Between Policy and COVID-19 Outbreaks in South Asia: Longitudinal Trend Analysis of Surveillance Data.南亚政策与新冠疫情爆发的相互作用:监测数据的纵向趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 17;7(6):e24251. doi: 10.2196/24251.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-pharmaceutical interventions in containing COVID-19 pandemic after the roll-out of coronavirus vaccines: a systematic review.疫苗推出后控制 COVID-19 大流行的非药物干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;24(1):1524. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18980-2.
2
Lactating nurses' experiences of return to work after lifting COVID-19 lockdown: A qualitative study.哺乳期护士在解除新冠疫情封锁后重返工作岗位的经历:一项定性研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 24;10(1):e23761. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23761. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A global analysis of the effectiveness of policy responses to COVID-19.全球对 COVID-19 政策应对效果的分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 6;13(1):5629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31709-2.
2
Effectiveness of government policies in response to the first COVID-19 outbreak.政府应对首次新冠疫情政策的有效性。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;2(4):e0000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000242. eCollection 2022.
3
Political institutions and policy responses during a crisis.危机期间的政治制度与政策应对措施。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 May;185:647-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
The predictors of COVID-19 mortality among health systems parameters: an ecological study across 203 countries.卫生系统参数对 COVID-19 死亡率的预测因素:跨越 203 个国家的生态研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 27;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00878-3.
5
Let Us Not Forget the Victims of COVID-19 Pandemics Who Did Not Die With the Coronavirus.让我们不要忘记那些没有死于新冠病毒但却在新冠疫情中离世的受害者。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:900100. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900100. eCollection 2022.
6
A Retrospective Global Assessment of Factors Associated With COVID-19 Policies and Health Outcomes.回顾性评估与 COVID-19 政策和健康结果相关的因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:843445. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843445. eCollection 2022.
7
The displacement of the SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta with Omicron: An investigation of hospital admissions and upper respiratory viral loads.德尔塔变异株被奥密克戎取代:对住院和上呼吸道病毒载量的调查。
EBioMedicine. 2022 May;79:104008. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104008. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
8
Public Compliance Matters in Evidence-Based Public Health Policy: Evidence from Evaluating Social Distancing in the First Wave of COVID-19.循证公共卫生政策中的公众遵从问题:评估 COVID-19 第一波期间社交隔离措施的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074033.
9
Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020-21.估算2019冠状病毒病大流行造成的超额死亡率:2020 - 2021年与2019冠状病毒病相关死亡率的系统分析
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1513-1536. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
10
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes with variants of concern in Ontario.安大略省针对 COVID-19 疫苗对有症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和关注变种的严重后果的有效性。
Nat Microbiol. 2022 Mar;7(3):379-385. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01053-0. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

全球应对 COVID-19 政策的差异:双向分析。

Variation in Global Policy Responses to COVID-19: A Bidirectional Analysis.

机构信息

Qu Qiubai School of Government, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213159, China.

Institute of Public Agency Administration, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213159, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054252.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054252
PMID:36901262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10001811/
Abstract

Against the unprecedented outbreaks of the COVID-19 variants, countries have introduced restrictive measures with discretion, ranging from lifting the closure thoroughly to implementing stringent policies, but all together guarding the global public health. Under the changing circumstances, we firstly apply the panel data vector autoregression (PVAR) model, using a sample of 176 countries/territories from 15 June 2021 to 15 April 2022, to estimate the potential associations among the policy responses, the progression of COVID-19 in deaths and vaccination, and medical resources possessed. Furthermore, we use the random effect method and the fixed effect speculation, to examine the determinants of policy variances across regions and over time. Our work has four main findings. Firstly, it showed the existence of a bidirectional relationship between the policy stringency and variables of interest including new daily deaths, the fully vaccinated percentage and health capacity. Secondly, conditional on the availability of vaccines, the sensitivity of policy responses to the death numbers tends to decline. Thirdly, the role of health capacity matters in coexisting with the virus mutation. Fourthly, regarding the variance in policy responses over time, the impact of new deaths tends to be seasonal. As to geographical differences in policy responses, we present the analysis for Asia, Europe, and Africa, and they show different levels of dependencies on the determinants. These findings suggest that bidirectional correlations exist in the complex context of wrestling with the COVID-19, as government interventions exert influence on the virus spread, the policy responses also progress alongside multiple factors evolving in the pandemic. This study will help policymakers, practitioners, and academia to formulate a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between policy responses and the contextualized implementation factors.

摘要

面对前所未有的 COVID-19 变种爆发,各国谨慎地采取了限制措施,从彻底解除封锁到实施严格政策不等,但都是为了保护全球公共卫生。在不断变化的情况下,我们首先应用面板数据向量自回归(PVAR)模型,使用 2021 年 6 月 15 日至 2022 年 4 月 15 日期间 176 个国家/地区的样本,来估计政策反应、COVID-19 死亡和疫苗接种进展以及医疗资源之间的潜在关联。此外,我们使用随机效应法和固定效应推断,来检验跨地区和随时间的政策差异的决定因素。我们的工作有四个主要发现。首先,它表明政策严格性与包括新的每日死亡人数、完全接种疫苗的比例和医疗能力在内的相关变量之间存在双向关系。其次,在疫苗供应的前提下,政策反应对死亡人数的敏感性趋于下降。第三,医疗能力的作用在与病毒突变共存中很重要。第四,关于政策反应随时间的变化,新死亡人数的影响具有季节性。至于政策反应的时间差异,新死亡人数的影响往往与季节有关。至于政策反应的地理差异,我们对亚洲、欧洲和非洲进行了分析,它们显示出对决定因素的不同依赖程度。这些发现表明,在应对 COVID-19 的复杂背景下存在双向相关性,因为政府干预对病毒传播产生影响,政策反应也随着大流行中不断演变的多种因素而发展。这项研究将帮助政策制定者、从业者和学术界全面了解政策反应与背景化实施因素之间的相互作用。