Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Open Heart. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001919.
Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly used to diagnose pericardial inflammation, imaging can still be challenging using conventional CMR techniques. Parametric mapping (T1/T2 mapping) techniques have emerged as novel methods to quantify focal and global changes of the myocardium without contrast agent. The aim of the present study was to implement parametric mapping to facilitate diagnostic decision-making in pericardial inflammation.
Twenty patients with pericardial inflammation underwent CMR (1.5T system) including T1-weighted/T2-weighted imaging, T1/T2 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement. T1/T2 mapping was performed in end-diastole covering three short-axis slices. Diagnosis of pericardial inflammation was made according to recent guidelines. T1/T2 measurements were pursued by manually drawing regions of interest (ROIs) in the thickened, diseased pericardium carefully avoiding contamination by other cardiac structures. Parametric values were correlated to further markers of pericardial inflammation, such as pericardial thickening and inflammatory parameters.
On average, the pericardium displayed a thickness of 4.8±1.0 mm. Mean T1 value was 1363.0±227.1 ms and T2 value was 123.3±52.6 ms, which were above patient's myocardial values (myocardial T1: 998.7±81.0 ms, p<0.001, median 1014.46 ms; T2: 68.0±28.9 m,p<0.001) and the values of a group of four patients with chronic pericarditis (T1: 953.0±16.7 ms; T2: 63.2±10.1 ms). T1 and T2 showed a correlation to the extent of the thickened pericardium (R=0.64, p=0.002 for T1, R=0.72, p=0.005 for T2). There was no correlation of pericardial T1/T2 to blood markers of inflammation, myocardial injury (C reactive protein, troponin, creatine kinase) or further CMR parameters.
In patients with pericardial inflammation, parametric mapping showed elevated T1 and T2 values. Parametric mapping may help to facilitate diagnosis of pericardial inflammation if conventional parameters such as pericardial hyperintensity in T1-weighted or T2-weighted imaging or contrast agent uptake are heterogeneous.
尽管心血管磁共振(CMR)越来越多地用于诊断心包炎,但使用常规 CMR 技术进行成像仍然具有挑战性。参数映射(T1/T2 映射)技术已成为一种新的方法,可以在不使用造影剂的情况下定量测量心肌的局灶性和整体变化。本研究的目的是实施参数映射以促进心包炎的诊断决策。
20 例心包炎患者行 CMR(1.5T 系统)检查,包括 T1 加权/T2 加权成像、T1/T2 映射和晚期钆增强。T1/T2 映射在舒张末期进行,覆盖三个短轴切片。心包炎的诊断依据最新指南。通过手动在增厚的病变心包中绘制感兴趣区(ROI)来进行 T1/T2 测量,仔细避免其他心脏结构的污染。参数值与心包炎的其他标志物相关,如心包增厚和炎症参数。
平均而言,心包显示厚度为 4.8±1.0mm。平均 T1 值为 1363.0±227.1ms,T2 值为 123.3±52.6ms,均高于患者的心肌值(心肌 T1:998.7±81.0ms,p<0.001,中位数 1014.46ms;T2:68.0±28.9ms,p<0.001)和 4 例慢性心包炎患者的组值(T1:953.0±16.7ms;T2:63.2±10.1ms)。T1 和 T2 与增厚心包的范围相关(T1:R=0.64,p=0.002;T2:R=0.72,p=0.005)。心包 T1/T2 与炎症的血液标志物、心肌损伤(C 反应蛋白、肌钙蛋白、肌酸激酶)或其他 CMR 参数无相关性。
在心包炎患者中,参数映射显示 T1 和 T2 值升高。如果 T1 加权或 T2 加权成像或造影剂摄取等常规参数不均匀,则参数映射可能有助于心包炎的诊断。