Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 27;12(5):e059921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059921.
Almost 78 000 women gave birth in the state of Victoria, Australia, in 2019. While most births occurred in metropolitan Melbourne and large regional centres, a significant proportion of women birthed in rural services. In late 2016, to support clinicians to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration, the Victorian government mandated provision of an emergency training programme, called Maternity and Newborn Emergencies (MANE), to rural and regional maternity services across the state. This paper describes the evaluation of MANE.
A quasi-experimental study design was used; the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model provided the framework.
Participants came from the 17 rural and regional Victorian maternity services who received MANE in 2018 and/or 2019.
Baseline data were collected from MANE attendees before MANE delivery, and at four time points up to 12 months post-delivery. Clinicians' knowledge of the MANE learning objectives, and confidence ratings regarding the emergencies covered in MANE were evaluated. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) assessed safety climate pre-MANE and 6 months post-MANE among all maternity providers at the sites.
Immediately post-MANE, most attendees reported increased confidence to escalate clinical concerns (n=251/259). Knowledge in the non-technical and practical aspects of the programme increased. Management of perinatal emergencies was viewed as equally stressful pre-MANE and post-MANE, but confidence to manage these emergencies increased post-delivery. Pre-MANE SAQ scores showed consistently strong and poor performing services. Six months post-MANE, some services showed improvements in SAQ scores indicative of improved safety climate.
MANE delivery resulted in both short-term and sustained improvements in knowledge of, and confidence in, maternity emergencies. Further investigation of the SAQ across Victoria may facilitate identification of services with a poor safety climate who could benefit from frequent targeted interventions (such as the MANE programme) at these sites.
2019 年,澳大利亚维多利亚州有近 78000 名女性分娩。虽然大多数分娩发生在大都市区墨尔本和大型地区中心,但仍有相当一部分女性在农村服务中心分娩。2016 年末,为了支持临床医生识别和应对临床恶化,维多利亚州政府授权向全州农村和地区产妇服务机构提供名为孕产妇和新生儿急症(MANE)的紧急培训计划。本文描述了对 MANE 的评估。
采用准实验研究设计;柯克帕特里克评估模型提供了框架。
参与者来自于 2018 年和/或 2019 年接受 MANE 的 17 家农村和地区维多利亚州产妇服务机构。
在 MANE 交付前和交付后 12 个月的四个时间点,从 MANE 参加者那里收集基线数据。评估了临床医生对 MANE 学习目标的了解程度以及对 MANE 涵盖的紧急情况的信心评分。在所有站点的产妇提供者中,安全态度问卷(SAQ)评估了 MANE 前和 MANE 后 6 个月的安全氛围。
MANE 后,大多数参加者报告说增加了上报临床关注的信心(n=251/259)。对该计划的非技术和实践方面的知识有所增加。围产期紧急情况的管理在 MANE 前后被认为同样具有压力,但在产后管理这些紧急情况的信心有所增加。MANE 前的 SAQ 分数显示出始终强劲和表现不佳的服务。MANE 后 6 个月,一些服务的 SAQ 分数有所提高,表明安全氛围有所改善。
MANE 的交付导致了对产妇急症的知识和信心的短期和持续提高。在维多利亚州进一步调查 SAQ 可能有助于确定安全氛围较差的服务机构,这些机构可以从这些服务机构的频繁有针对性的干预(如 MANE 计划)中受益。