Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
School of Business, University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC), Adelphi, MD 20774, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 20;19(10):6227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106227.
Depression is one of the leading causes of disability in the United States. Depression prevalence varies by income and sex, but more evidence is needed on the role income inequality may play in these associations.
To examine the association between the Poverty to Income Ratio (PIR)-as a proxy for income-and depressive symptoms in adults ages 20 years and older, and to test how depression was concentrated among PIR.
Using the 2005-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), we employed Negative Binomial Regression (NBRG) in a sample of 24,166 adults. We used a 9-item PHQ (Public Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9) to measure the presence of depressive symptoms as an outcome variable. Additionally, we plotted a concentration curve to explain how depression is distributed among PIR.
In comparison with high-income, the low-income population in the study suffered more from greater than or equal to ten on the PHQ-9 by 4.5 and 3.5 times, respectively. The results of NBRG have shown that people with low-PIR (IRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23-1.37) and medium-PIR (IRR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.46-1.65) have experienced a higher relative risk ratio of having depressive symptoms. Women have a higher IRR (IRR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.24-1.34) than men. We observed that depression was concentrated among low-PIR men and women, with a higher concentration among women.
Addressing depression should target low-income populations and populations with higher income inequality.
在美国,抑郁症是导致残疾的主要原因之一。抑郁症的患病率因收入和性别而异,但需要更多证据来证明收入不平等在这些关联中可能起到的作用。
本研究旨在调查贫困收入比(PIR)作为收入的代表与 20 岁及以上成年人抑郁症状之间的关系,并检验抑郁症状在 PIR 中的集中程度。
利用 2005-2016 年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,我们采用负二项回归(NBRG)对 24166 名成年人样本进行了分析。我们使用 9 项 PHQ(公共卫生问卷,PHQ-9)作为衡量抑郁症状的结果变量。此外,我们绘制了集中曲线,以解释抑郁症状在 PIR 中的分布情况。
与高收入人群相比,研究中的低收入人群在 PHQ-9 上的得分大于或等于 10 的比例分别高出 4.5 倍和 3.5 倍。NBRG 的结果表明,低收入人群(IRR:1.30,95%CI:1.23-1.37)和中收入人群(IRR:1.55,95%CI:1.46-1.65)患抑郁症状的相对风险比更高。女性的 IRR(IRR:1.29,95%CI:1.24-1.34)高于男性。我们观察到,抑郁症状集中在低收入人群的男性和女性中,女性的集中程度更高。
解决抑郁问题应针对低收入人群和收入不平等程度较高的人群。