López-Toro Edith, Wolf Casper J H, González Rafael A, van den Brink Wim, Schellekens Arnt, Vélez-Pastrana María C
PhD Program in Clinical Psychology, Universidad Carlos Albizu, P.O. Box 9023711, San Juan, PR 00902-3711, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2022 May 19;11(10):2883. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102883.
Substance use disorders (SUD) often co-occur with other psychiatric conditions. Research on SUD and comorbid disorders generally flows from a categorical diagnostic or dimensional latent variable perspective, where symptoms are viewed as independent indicators of an underlying disorder. In contrast, the current study took a network analysis perspective to examine the relationships between DSM symptoms of SUD, ADHD, conduct disorder (CD), depression (MDD), and borderline personality disorder (BPD). In addition, we explored possible gender differences in the network structures of these symptoms.
In a sample of 722 adult treatment-seeking patients with SUD from the International ADHD in Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Study (IASP) we estimated the network structure for 41 symptoms of SUD, ADHD, CD, MDD, and BPD. We described the structure of symptom networks and their characteristics for the total sample, and we compared the symptom networks for males and females.
Network analyses identified seven clusters of symptoms, largely corresponding with the DSM diagnostic categories. There were some connections between clusters, mainly between some hyperactivity symptoms and CD and depressive symptoms. ADHD hyperactivity was most central in the symptom network. Invariance tests revealed no significant gender differences in the structure of symptom networks.
The current findings support the categorical DSM classification of mental disorders in treatment-seeking patients with SUD. Future network analyses should include a broader range of symptoms and prospectively explore changes in the symptoms network of patients during treatment.
物质使用障碍(SUD)常与其他精神疾病共病。对SUD及共病障碍的研究通常从分类诊断或维度潜变量的角度进行,在这种角度下,症状被视为潜在障碍的独立指标。相比之下,本研究采用网络分析的视角来检验SUD、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、品行障碍(CD)、抑郁症(MDD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的DSM症状之间的关系。此外,我们还探讨了这些症状的网络结构中可能存在的性别差异。
在国际物质使用障碍中注意力缺陷多动障碍患病率研究(IASP)的722名寻求治疗的成年SUD患者样本中,我们估计了SUD、ADHD、CD、MDD和BPD的41种症状的网络结构。我们描述了总样本症状网络的结构及其特征,并比较了男性和女性的症状网络。
网络分析确定了七个症状簇,在很大程度上与DSM诊断类别相对应。簇之间存在一些联系,主要是一些多动症状与CD和抑郁症状之间的联系。ADHD多动在症状网络中最为核心。不变性检验显示症状网络结构不存在显著的性别差异。
目前的研究结果支持了寻求治疗的SUD患者精神障碍的DSM分类。未来的网络分析应纳入更广泛的症状,并前瞻性地探索患者在治疗期间症状网络的变化。