• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项 ICU 患者安全的对比研究。

A comparative study of patient safety in the intensive care units.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatric Nursing and Management, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Shahid Labbafinezhad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Pediatric Nursing, Nursing & Midwifery School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2022 Sep;9(5):2381-2389. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1252. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1252
PMID:35633148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9374399/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to assess patient-safety principles in ICUs.

DESIGN

This is a descriptive-comparative study.

METHODS

The research environment includes ICUs of hospitals affiliated to the two universities of medical sciences in Tehran. Sampling was done by census using Time and Event Sampling methods. Research instrument was "Patient Safety Principles Checklist". Data analysis was performed using SPSS-20 and descriptive-inferential statistics with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

There is no significant difference (p-value = .15) in the level of observance of patient-safety principles in two university-affiliated hospitals A (133.26 ± 9.14) and B (128.16 ± 18.01). Evaluation of the mean scores obtained in each dimension and in each of the ICUs was showed that only in dimension No.3 the difference was significant (F[68,2] = 5.20, p-value = .008) and in the AICUs (16.13 ± 1.8) (p-value = .04), it was significantly lower than other ICUs. Identifying risk factors for the patient's immunity reduces the side effects of patient care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 ICU 中的患者安全原则。

设计

这是一项描述性比较研究。

方法

研究环境包括德黑兰两所医科大学附属医院的 ICU。采用时间和事件抽样法进行整群抽样。研究工具是“患者安全原则检查表”。使用 SPSS-20 进行数据分析,并采用具有 0.05 显著性水平的描述性推断统计。

结果

两所大学附属医院 A(133.26±9.14)和 B(128.16±18.01)患者安全原则的遵守程度没有显著差异(p 值=0.15)。评估每个 ICU 维度和每个 ICU 的平均得分表明,仅在第 3 维度存在显著差异(F[68,2]=5.20,p 值=0.008),AICU(16.13±1.8)(p 值=0.04)显著低于其他 ICU。识别患者免疫的风险因素可降低患者护理的副作用。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of patient safety in the intensive care units.一项 ICU 患者安全的对比研究。
Nurs Open. 2022 Sep;9(5):2381-2389. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1252. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Assessing patient safety culture in 15 intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.评估 15 个重症监护病房的患者安全文化:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07665-4.
3
The most frequent and important events that threaten patient safety in intensive care units from the perspective of health-care professionals'.从医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,重症监护病房中威胁患者安全的最常见且最重要的事件。
J Res Med Sci. 2018 Dec 28;23:104. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_140_18. eCollection 2018.
4
Assessment of Patient Safety Culture in Iranian Academic Hospitals: Strengths and Weaknesses.伊朗学术医院患者安全文化评估:优势与劣势。
J Patient Saf. 2018 Dec;14(4):213-226. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000199.
5
The effect of nurse empowerment educational program on patient safety culture: a randomized controlled trial.护士授权教育培训计划对患者安全文化的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1255-6.
6
The association between self-reported workload and perceptions of patient safety culture: A study of intensive care unit nurses.自我报告的工作量与对患者安全文化认知之间的关联:一项重症监护病房护士的研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(7-8):1003-1017. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15646. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
7
Factors affecting nursing error communication in intensive care units: A qualitative study.影响重症监护病房护理差错沟通的因素:一项定性研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):131-144. doi: 10.1177/0969733020952100. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units.住院患者中可预防的药物不良事件:重症监护病房与普通病房的对比研究
Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;25(8):1289-97. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00014.
9
Identifying the dimensions of patient privacy in intensive care units: a qualitative content analysis study.确定重症监护病房中患者隐私的维度:一项定性内容分析研究。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2022 Oct 25;15:6. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v15i6.11048. eCollection 2022.
10
Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution.在同一机构的重症监护病房中,对安全文化的认知存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251505.76026.CF.

引用本文的文献

1
Components of safe nursing care in the intensive care units: a qualitative study.重症监护病房安全护理的组成部分:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 2;23(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02281-5.
2
Relationships between job satisfaction, occupational burnout and rationing of care among intensive care unit nurses.重症监护室护士工作满意度、职业倦怠与护理配给的关系。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 14;12:1400169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1400169. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire (HSOPSC) in neonatal intensive care units: a methodological study.新生儿重症监护病房患者安全文化调查问卷(HSOPSC)波斯语版本的心理测量学评估:一项方法学研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 23;22(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01435-1.
4
Patient safety improvement in the gastroenterology department: An action research.消化内科患者安全改进:一项行动研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 15;18(8):e0289511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289511. eCollection 2023.
5
Determining the psychometric properties of safety attitudes questionnaire in NICUs.测定 NICUs 中安全态度调查问卷的心理计量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;11(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01229-9.
6
Patient safety culture in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative content analysis.新生儿重症监护病房的患者安全文化:定性内容分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;11:1065522. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1065522. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessment of procrastination in providing nursing care among Iranian nursing staff.伊朗护理人员在提供护理服务时拖延行为的评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 5;21(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01132-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Errors in Medical Imaging and Radiography Practice: A Systematic Review.医学成像与放射学实践中的错误:一项系统综述
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2015 Dec;46(4):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
2
Knowledge and Practices of Hand Washing among Health Professionals in Dubti Referral Hospital, Dubti, Afar, Northeast Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东北部阿法尔州杜布提市杜布提转诊医院卫生专业人员的洗手知识与实践
Adv Prev Med. 2018 Nov 22;2018:5290797. doi: 10.1155/2018/5290797. eCollection 2018.
3
Core competencies for nurses in Chinese intensive care units: a cross-sectional study.中国重症监护病房护士的核心能力:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Sep;24(5):276-282. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12398. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
Patient safety culture among nurses at a tertiary government hospital in the Philippines.菲律宾一家三级政府医院护士的患者安全文化。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Dec;44:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
Communication with patients in intensive care units: a scoping review.重症监护病房患者的沟通:范围综述。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 May;24(3):115-131. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12377. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Relationship between ethical leadership and organisational commitment of nurses with perception of patient safety culture.伦理领导与护士对患者安全文化感知的组织承诺之间的关系。
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Sep;26(6):726-734. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12607. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
7
How Can Safer Care Be Achieved? Patient Safety Officers' Perceptions of Factors Influencing Patient Safety in Sweden.如何实现更安全的护理?瑞典患者安全官员对影响患者安全因素的看法。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Jun;16(2):155-161. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000262.
8
An integrative review of drug errors in critical care.重症监护中用药错误的综合综述。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Feb;17(1):63-72. doi: 10.1177/1751143715605119. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
9
Emergency medical services responders' perceptions of the effect of stress and anxiety on patient safety in the out-of-hospital emergency care of children: a qualitative study.紧急医疗服务响应者对压力和焦虑对儿童院外急救中患者安全影响的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e014057. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014057.
10
Medical morbidity and mortality conferences: past, present and future.医学发病率与死亡率研讨会:过去、现在与未来
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Mar;93(1097):148-152. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134103. Epub 2016 Nov 21.