Cerk Klara, Aguilera-Gómez Margarita
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology University of Granada (INYTA-UGR) Granada Spain.
EFSA J. 2022 May 25;20(Suppl 1):e200404. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.e200404. eCollection 2022 May.
The expansion of fields related to probiotics, microbiome-targeted interventions and an evolving landscape for implementation across policy, industry and end users, signifies an era of important clinical translational changes. Characteristics and perception of traditional probiotics stemmed from the historical long-term use of fermented products. Although the distinction between probiotic microorganisms and fermentation-associated microbes is important, it is often confused as not all fermented foods are probiotic supplements. Current innovation in area of biotechnology and bioinformatics is emerging outside of the classical definitions and new probiotics will emerge from novel sources, challenging scientific as well as regulatory instructions. At the same time, the search for individual and group microbiome signatures - biomarkers in order to predict disease incidence, progression and response to treatment is a key area of microbiological and multidisciplinary research, enabled by efficient and powerful processing of large data sets. However, the regulation of marketed beneficial microbes and probiotics differs among countries and the basic level of classification, which depend on probiotic classification is not globally harmonised. At the same time, the regulation is very demanding to evaluate the safety of products on the market, so that only those products with scientific evidence benefits can obtain positive recognition in ways of health claims. Collaborative experimental and theoretical approaches and case studies have assisted the progress in this crosscutting area of research. There is a requirement to clearly specify criteria and provide details about ways and approaches of achieving those criteria with the intention that manufacturers can benefit from a transparent way of communicating product quality to end users.
与益生菌、针对微生物群的干预措施相关领域的扩展,以及在政策、行业和终端用户中不断演变的实施格局,标志着一个重要临床转化变革的时代。传统益生菌的特性和认知源于发酵产品的长期历史使用。尽管益生菌微生物与发酵相关微生物之间的区别很重要,但人们常常将其混淆,因为并非所有发酵食品都是益生菌补充剂。生物技术和生物信息学领域的当前创新正在突破经典定义,新的益生菌将从新来源出现,这对科学以及监管指导都构成了挑战。与此同时,寻找个体和群体微生物群特征——生物标志物,以预测疾病的发病率、进展和对治疗的反应,是微生物学和多学科研究的一个关键领域,这得益于对大数据集的高效且强大的处理。然而,各国对上市有益微生物和益生菌的监管有所不同,且依赖于益生菌分类的基本分类水平并未在全球范围内统一。同时,监管对评估市场上产品的安全性要求很高,因此只有那些有科学证据证明有益的产品才能通过健康声明的方式获得正面认可。协作性的实验和理论方法以及案例研究推动了这一交叉研究领域的进展。需要明确规定标准,并详细说明实现这些标准的方式和方法,以便制造商能够以透明的方式向终端用户传达产品质量并从中受益。