Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2022 Aug 1;100(8). doi: 10.1093/jas/skac200.
Oral microbiota play a prominent role in canine periodontal disease and wet foods are often blamed for poor oral health, but canine oral microbial communities have been poorly studied. We aimed to determine differences in oral health measures, breath odor, and oral microbiota populations of dogs fed wet or dry food. Twelve adult dogs fed either a commercial dry (extruded) or commercial wet (canned) food for 6 wk were studied. Breath samples were measured for sulfur compounds, teeth were scored for plaque, calculus, and gingivitis by a blinded veterinary dentist, salivary pH was measured, and supragingival (SUP) and subgingival (SUB) plaque samples were collected for microbiota analysis. Plaque DNA was extracted and Illumina sequencing was conducted. Phylogenetic data were analyzed using the CosmosID bioinformatics platform and SAS 9.4, with P <0.05 being significant and P <0.10 being trends. Plaque coverage tended to be higher (P < 0.10) in dogs fed wet vs. dry food, but other oral health scores were not different. Dogs fed dry food had higher (P < 0.05) salivary pH and lower (P < 0.05) breath sulfur concentrations than those consuming wet food. Bacterial alpha diversity was higher in SUP than SUB samples, and a clear separation in beta diversity was observed between sample sites on principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots. In SUP samples, dogs fed wet food had a higher alpha diversity than dogs fed dry food, with PCoA plots showing a separation between wet and dry food. Relative abundances of Firmicutes, Synergistetes, and 10 bacterial genera were different (P < 0.05) in SUB samples of dogs fed wet vs. dry food. Relative abundances of Fusobacteria and over 20 bacterial genera were different (P < 0.05) in SUP samples of dogs fed wet vs. dry food. In general, oral health-associated bacterial taxa (Pasteurella, Capnocytophaga, Corynebacterium) were higher, while bacteria associated with poor oral health (Fretibacterium fastidiosum, Filifactor alocis, Treponema medium, Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas canoris, Porphyromonas gingivalis) were lower in dogs fed dry food. Such shifts in the oral microbiota may impact periodontal disease risk, but longer dietary intervention studies are required to confirm their role in the disease process. Our results suggest that dogs fed dry extruded foods have lower breath odor and tooth plaque buildup and an oral microbiota population more closely associated with oral health than dogs fed wet canned foods.
口腔微生物在犬牙周病中起着重要作用,湿粮通常被认为是口腔健康不佳的罪魁祸首,但犬口腔微生物群落的研究还很不完善。我们旨在确定喂养湿粮或干粮的犬的口腔健康指标、口臭和口腔微生物群的差异。12 只成年犬分别喂养商业干粮(膨化)或商业湿粮(罐装)6 周。用硫磺化合物测量呼吸样本,由盲法兽医牙医对牙齿进行菌斑、牙石和牙龈炎评分,测量唾液 pH 值,并收集龈上(SUP)和龈下(SUB)菌斑样本进行微生物分析。提取菌斑 DNA 并进行 Illumina 测序。使用 CosmosID 生物信息学平台和 SAS 9.4 分析系统发育数据,P<0.05 为显著,P<0.10 为趋势。与喂养湿粮的犬相比,喂养干粮的犬的菌斑覆盖率往往更高(P<0.10),但其他口腔健康评分无差异。喂养干粮的犬的唾液 pH 值较高(P<0.05),呼吸中硫浓度较低(P<0.05)。与 SUB 样本相比,SUP 样本中的细菌 α 多样性更高,主坐标分析(PCoA)图上的样本点之间存在明显的 β 多样性分离。在 SUP 样本中,喂养湿粮的犬的 α 多样性高于喂养干粮的犬,PCoA 图显示了湿粮和干粮之间的分离。与喂养湿粮的犬相比,喂养干粮的犬 SUB 样本中厚壁菌门、互养菌门和 10 个细菌属的相对丰度不同(P<0.05)。与喂养湿粮的犬相比,喂养干粮的犬 SUP 样本中梭杆菌门和 20 多个细菌属的相对丰度不同(P<0.05)。一般来说,与口腔健康相关的细菌类群(巴斯德氏菌、卡他莫拉菌)较高,而与口腔健康不良相关的细菌(迟缓真杆菌、纤维弧菌、中间密螺旋体、福赛斯坦纳菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普雷沃菌)较低。喂养干食的犬口腔微生物群的这种变化可能会影响牙周病的风险,但需要进行更长时间的饮食干预研究来确认它们在疾病过程中的作用。我们的结果表明,喂养干燥膨化食品的犬的呼吸气味和牙齿牙菌斑堆积较少,其口腔微生物群与口腔健康的相关性更强,而喂养湿罐装食品的犬则较差。