Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2021 Jul 1;99(7). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab100.
Microbiota plays a prominent role in periodontal disease, but the canine oral microbiota and how dental chews may affect these populations have been poorly studied. We aimed to determine the differences in oral microbiota of adult dogs consuming dental chews compared with control dogs consuming only a diet. Twelve adult female beagle dogs (mean age = 5.31 ± 1.08 yr) were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design consisting of 28-d periods. Treatments (n = 12/group) included: diet only (CT); diet + Bones & Chews Dental Treats (BC; Chewy, Inc., Dania Beach, FL); diet + Dr. Lyon's Grain-Free Dental Treats (DL; Dr. Lyon's, LLC, Dania Beach, FL); and diet + Greenies Dental Treats (GR; Mars Petcare US, Franklin, TN). Each day, one chew was provided 4 h after mealtime. On day 27, breath samples were analyzed for total volatile sulfur compound concentrations using a Halimeter. On day 0 of each period, teeth were cleaned by a veterinary dentist blinded to treatments. Teeth were scored for plaque, calculus, and gingivitis by the same veterinary dentist on day 28 of each period. After scoring, salivary (SAL), subgingival (SUB), and supragingival (SUP) samples were collected for microbiota analysis using Illumina MiSeq. All data were analyzed using SAS (version 9.4) using the Mixed Models procedure, with P < 0.05 considered significant. All dogs consuming chews had lower calculus coverage and thickness, pocket depth and bleeding, plaque thickness, and halitosis compared with CT. In all sites of collection, CT dogs had a higher relative abundance of one or more potentially pathogenic bacteria (Porphyromonas, Anaerovorax, Desulfomicrobium, Tannerella, and Treponema) and lower relative abundance of one or more genera associated with oral health (Neisseria, Corynebacterium, Capnocytophaga, Actinomyces, Lautropia, Bergeyella, and Moraxella) than those fed chews. DL reduced Porphyromonas in SUP and SUB samples. DL and GR reduced Treponema in SUP samples. DL increased Corynebacterium in all sites of collection. BC increased Corynebacterium in SAL samples. DL and GR increased Neisseria in SAL samples. DL increased Actinomyces in the SUB sample. GR increased Actinomyces in SAL samples. Our results suggest that the dental chews tested in this study may aid in reducing periodontal disease risk in dogs by beneficially shifting the microbiota inhabiting plaque and saliva of a dog's oral cavity. These shifts occurred over a short period of time and were correlated with improved oral health scores.
口腔微生物群在牙周病中起着重要作用,但犬口腔微生物群以及牙咀嚼物如何影响这些群体的研究还很少。我们旨在确定与仅食用饮食的对照犬相比,食用牙咀嚼物的成年犬的口腔微生物群的差异。使用由 28 天周期组成的重复 4×4 拉丁方设计,对 12 只成年雌性比格犬(平均年龄= 5.31 ± 1.08 岁)进行了研究。处理(n = 12/组)包括:仅饮食(CT);饮食+骨头和咀嚼牙齿治疗(BC;Chewy,Inc.,Dania Beach,FL);饮食+ Lyon 博士无谷物牙齿治疗(DL;Lyon 博士,LLC,Dania Beach,FL);和饮食+ Greenies 牙齿治疗(GR;Mars Petcare US,Franklin,TN)。每天,在饭后 4 小时提供一个咀嚼物。在第 27 天,使用 Halimeter 分析呼吸样本中总挥发性硫化合物的浓度。在每个周期的第 0 天,由一名兽医牙医对牙齿进行清洁,该牙医对治疗方法不知情。在每个周期的第 28 天,由同一名兽医牙医对牙齿进行牙斑,牙垢和牙龈炎评分。评分后,使用 Illumina MiSeq 收集唾液(SAL),龈下(SUB)和龈上(SUP)样本进行微生物组分析。使用 SAS(版本 9.4)的混合模型程序分析所有数据,认为 P <0.05具有统计学意义。与 CT 相比,所有咀嚼犬的牙垢覆盖率和厚度,牙周袋深度和出血,牙菌斑厚度和口臭均较低。在所有收集点,CT 犬的一种或多种潜在致病性细菌(卟啉单胞菌,拟杆菌,脱硫微菌,坦纳拉菌和密螺旋体)的相对丰度更高,而与口腔健康相关的一种或多种属的相对丰度更低(奈瑟菌,棒状杆菌,卡他莫拉菌,放线菌,Lautropia,Bergeyella 和莫拉菌)。 DL 减少了 SUP 和 SUB 样本中的卟啉单胞菌。 DL 和 GR 减少了 SUP 样本中的密螺旋体。 DL 增加了所有收集点的 Corynebacterium。 BC 增加了 SAL 样本中的 Corynebacterium。 DL 和 GR 增加了 SAL 样本中的奈瑟菌。 DL 增加了 SUB 样本中的放线菌。 GR 增加了 SAL 样本中的放线菌。我们的结果表明,本研究中测试的牙咀嚼物可能通过有益地改变犬口腔菌斑和唾液中栖息的微生物群,有助于降低犬牙周病的风险。这些变化发生在很短的时间内,并与口腔健康评分的改善相关。