Department of Radiology, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Department of Pulmonology, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Tomography. 2022 Apr 24;8(3):1221-1227. doi: 10.3390/tomography8030100.
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of traditional chest X-ray (CXR) and digital tomosynthesis (DTS) compared to computed tomography (CT) in detecting pulmonary interstitial changes in patients having recovered from severe COVID-19.
This was a retrospective observational study, and received local ethics committee approval. Patients suspected of having COVID-19 pneumonia upon emergency department admission between 1 March and 31 August 2020, and who underwent CXR followed by DTS and CT, were considered. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection proven by a positive RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs performed upon admission to the hospital, and with complete clinical recovery; (2) a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS, according to the Berlin criteria, during hospitalization; (3) no recent history of other lung disease; and (4) complete imaging follow-up by CXR, DTS, and CT for at least 6 months and up to one year. Analysis of DTS images was carried out independently by two radiologists with 16 and 10 years of experience in chest imaging, respectively. The following findings were evaluated: (1) ground-glass opacities (GGOs); (2) air-space consolidations with or without air bronchogram; (3) reticulations; and (4) linear consolidation. Indicators of diagnostic performance of RX and digital tomosynthesis were calculated using CT as a reference. All data were analyzed using R statistical software (version 4.0.2, 2020).
Out of 44 patients initially included, 25 patients (17 M/8 F), with a mean age of 64 years (standard deviation (SD): 12), met the criteria and were included. The overall average numbers of findings confirmed by CT were GGOs in 11 patients, lung consolidations in 8 patients, 7 lung interstitial reticulations, and linear consolidation in 20 patients. DTS showed a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared to CXR in recognizing interstitial lung abnormalities-especially GGOs ( = 0.0412) and linear consolidations ( = 0.0009). The average dose for chest X-ray was 0.10 mSv (0.07-0.32), for DTS was 1.03 mSv (0.74-2.00), and for CT scan was 3 mSv.
According to our results, DTS possesses a high diagnostic accuracy, compared with CXR, in revealing lung fibrotic changes in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia.
评估传统胸部 X 线(CXR)和数字断层合成(DTS)与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比,在检测从严重 COVID-19 中康复的患者的肺间质变化方面的诊断准确性。
这是一项回顾性观察性研究,获得了当地伦理委员会的批准。考虑的是在 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日期间因急诊入院时疑似患有 COVID-19 肺炎,并接受 CXR 后行 DTS 和 CT 的患者。纳入标准如下:(1)入院时鼻咽拭子 RT-PCR 检测呈 SARS-CoV-2 阳性,且临床完全恢复的患者;(2)根据柏林标准,住院期间患有 SARS-CoV-2 相关 ARDS;(3)无近期其他肺部疾病史;(4)至少进行 6 个月至 1 年的 CXR、DTS 和 CT 影像学随访。由两位分别具有 16 年和 10 年胸部影像学经验的放射科医生对 DTS 图像进行独立分析。评估了以下发现:(1)磨玻璃影(GGO);(2)伴有或不伴有空气支气管征的空气腔实变;(3)网状影;(4)线性实变。使用 CT 作为参考,计算 RX 和数字断层合成的诊断性能指标。使用 R 统计软件(版本 4.0.2,2020 年)分析所有数据。
最初纳入的 44 名患者中,有 25 名患者(17 名男性/8 名女性),平均年龄为 64 岁(标准差(SD):12),符合标准并被纳入。经 CT 证实的总体平均发现数为 11 例患者的 GGO、8 例患者的肺实变、7 例患者的肺间质网状影和 20 例患者的线性实变。DTS 在识别间质肺异常方面明显优于 CXR,尤其是在识别 GGO( = 0.0412)和线性实变( = 0.0009)方面。胸部 X 射线的平均剂量为 0.10 mSv(0.07-0.32),DTS 为 1.03 mSv(0.74-2.00),CT 扫描为 3 mSv。
根据我们的结果,与 CXR 相比,DTS 在显示 COVID-19 肺炎康复患者的肺纤维化变化方面具有较高的诊断准确性。