Suppr超能文献

吸入氧化亚氮与鼻内咪达唑仑对小儿患者行为管理和疼痛感知的镇静效果比较:一项半口随机对照临床试验

Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Srinivasan Navaneetha Krishnan, Karunagaran Pradeep, Panchal Veerale, Subramanian Emg

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Saveetha Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 2):S111-S116. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2085.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of children has always been a challenging task in the dental office, as many children exhibit extreme fear, apprehension, and anxiety toward dental procedures. Pharmacological means of behavior management such as sedation are now at the forefront. Midazolam and nitrous oxide are the commonly employed pharmacological agents for sedation in pediatric dentistry. Though each route has its advantages and disadvantages, we compared the effect of atomized intranasal midazolam (dosage 0.3 mg/kg body weight) and nitrous oxide oxygen sedation in evaluating the behavior of child, pain experienced during local anesthesia administration, sedation level, and patient's acceptance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 35 ( = 35) anxious pediatric patients aged 4-7 years with negative and definitely negative behavioral rating were randomized to receive intranasal midazolam and inhalational nitrous oxide through mask. The overall behavior, alertness, and cry were recorded using Houpt rating scale while pain and sedation were assessed by face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) and Ellis sedation scores, respectively.

RESULTS

The children who received intranasal midazolam sedation were calm, had less adverse effects, and had better acceptance of the drug. Both the techniques of sedation were found to be equally effective in terms overall behavior rating.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal midazolam was found to be as effective as nitrous oxide sedation for controlling behavior and providing adequate sedation in pediatric dental patients. It can also be an effective alternative for anxious patients who are unable to maintain the nitrous oxide mask throughout the dental procedure.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Srinivasan NK, Karunagaran P, Panchal V, Comparison of the Sedative Effect of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide and Intranasal Midazolam in Behavior Management and Pain Perception of Pediatric Patients: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(S-2):S111-S116.

摘要

背景

在牙科诊所,儿童治疗管理一直是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为许多儿童对牙科治疗表现出极度恐惧、忧虑和焦虑。诸如镇静等行为管理的药理学方法如今处于前沿。咪达唑仑和一氧化二氮是儿科牙科中常用的镇静药理学药物。尽管每种途径都有其优缺点,但我们比较了雾化鼻内咪达唑仑(剂量为0.3毫克/千克体重)和一氧化二氮-氧气镇静在评估儿童行为、局部麻醉给药期间经历的疼痛、镇静水平和患者接受度方面的效果。

材料与方法

总共35名年龄在4至7岁、行为评级为阴性及绝对阴性的焦虑儿科患者被随机分组,分别通过面罩接受鼻内咪达唑仑和吸入一氧化二氮。使用豪普特评分量表记录总体行为、警觉性和哭闹情况,同时分别通过面部、腿部、活动、哭闹和安慰性(FLACC)评分以及埃利斯镇静评分来评估疼痛和镇静情况。

结果

接受鼻内咪达唑仑镇静的儿童较为平静,不良反应较少,对药物的接受度更高。就总体行为评级而言,两种镇静技术被发现同样有效。

结论

发现鼻内咪达唑仑在控制儿科牙科患者的行为和提供足够镇静方面与一氧化二氮镇静效果相同。对于在整个牙科治疗过程中无法持续佩戴一氧化二氮面罩的焦虑患者,它也是一种有效的替代方法。

如何引用本文

斯里尼瓦桑NK、卡鲁纳加兰P、潘查尔V,《吸入一氧化二氮与鼻内咪达唑仑在儿科患者行为管理和疼痛感知方面的镇静效果比较:一项半口随机对照临床试验》。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2021年;14(S-2):S111-S116。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b25a/9108794/adbeee235f3a/ijcpd-14-s111-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验