Chen Shenlun, Zhang Meng, Wang Jiazhou, Xu Midie, Hu Weigang, Wee Leonard, Dekker Andre, Sheng Weiqi, Zhang Zhen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
MAASTRO (Department of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 11;12:833978. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833978. eCollection 2022.
Tumor grading is an essential factor for cancer staging and survival prognostication. The widely used the WHO grading system defines the histological grade of CRC adenocarcinoma based on the density of glandular formation on whole-slide images (WSIs). We developed a fully automated approach for stratifying colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' risk of mortality directly from histology WSI relating to gland formation. A tissue classifier was trained to categorize regions on WSI as glands, stroma, immune cells, background, and other tissues. A gland formation classifier was trained on expert annotations to categorize regions as different degrees of tumor gland formation versus normal tissues. The glandular formation density can thus be estimated using the aforementioned tissue categorization and gland formation information. This estimation was called a semi-quantitative gland formation ratio (SGFR), which was used as a prognostic factor in survival analysis. We evaluated gland formation percentage and validated it by comparing it against the WHO cutoff point. Survival data and gland formation maps were then used to train a spatial pyramid pooling survival network (SPPSN) as a deep survival model. We compared the survival prediction performance of estimated gland formation percentage and the SPPSN deep survival grade and found that the deep survival grade had improved discrimination. A univariable Cox model for survival yielded moderate discrimination with SGFR (c-index 0.62) and deep survival grade (c-index 0.64) in an independent institutional test set. Deep survival grade also showed better discrimination performance in multivariable Cox regression. The deep survival grade significantly increased the c-index of the baseline Cox model in both validation set and external test set, but the inclusion of SGFR can only improve the Cox model less in external test and is unable to improve the Cox model in the validation set.
肿瘤分级是癌症分期和生存预后的重要因素。广泛使用的世界卫生组织(WHO)分级系统基于全切片图像(WSIs)上腺管形成的密度来定义结直肠癌腺癌的组织学分级。我们开发了一种全自动方法,可直接根据与腺管形成相关的组织学WSIs对结直肠癌(CRC)患者的死亡风险进行分层。训练了一个组织分类器,将WSIs上的区域分类为腺体、基质、免疫细胞、背景和其他组织。基于专家注释训练了一个腺管形成分类器,将区域分类为不同程度的肿瘤腺管形成与正常组织。因此,可以使用上述组织分类和腺管形成信息来估计腺管形成密度。这种估计被称为半定量腺管形成率(SGFR),它被用作生存分析中的一个预后因素。我们评估了腺管形成百分比,并通过与WHO临界值进行比较对其进行了验证。然后使用生存数据和腺管形成图来训练一个空间金字塔池化生存网络(SPPSN)作为深度生存模型。我们比较了估计的腺管形成百分比和SPPSN深度生存分级的生存预测性能,发现深度生存分级具有更好的区分度。在一个独立的机构测试集中,单变量Cox生存模型对SGFR(c指数为0.62)和深度生存分级(c指数为0.64)的区分度适中。在多变量Cox回归中,深度生存分级也表现出更好的区分性能。深度生存分级在验证集和外部测试集中均显著提高了基线Cox模型的c指数,但在外部测试中纳入SGFR对Cox模型的改善较小,且在验证集中无法改善Cox模型。