Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14215, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 May;151(5):3359. doi: 10.1121/10.0011400.
This study quantified the effects of face masks on spectral speech acoustics in healthy talkers using habitual, loud, and clear speaking styles. Harvard sentence lists were read aloud by 17 healthy talkers in each of the 3 speech styles without wearing a mask, when wearing a surgical mask, and when wearing a KN95 mask. Outcome measures included speech intensity, spectral moments, and spectral tilt and energy in mid-range frequencies which were measured at the utterance level. Masks were associated with alterations in spectral density characteristics consistent with a low-pass filtering effect, although the effect sizes varied. Larger effects were observed for center of gravity and spectral variability (in habitual speech) and spectral tilt (across all speech styles). KN95 masks demonstrated a greater effect on speech acoustics than surgical masks. The overall pattern of the changes in speech acoustics was consistent across all three speech styles. Loud speech, followed by clear speech, was effective in remediating the filtering effects of the masks compared to habitual speech.
本研究使用习惯性、大声和清晰的说话方式,量化了口罩对面部健康说话者语音频谱的影响。17 名健康说话者在不戴口罩、戴外科口罩和戴 KN95 口罩的情况下,分别用三种说话方式大声朗读哈佛句子列表。测量指标包括语音强度、频谱矩、中频频谱倾斜和能量,均在语句水平上进行测量。口罩与频谱密度特征的变化有关,这些变化与低通滤波效应一致,尽管效应大小有所不同。在重心和频谱可变性(习惯性说话)以及频谱倾斜(所有说话方式)方面观察到更大的影响。KN95 口罩对语音声学的影响大于外科口罩。在所有三种说话方式中,语音声学的变化模式总体一致。与习惯性说话相比,大声说话,其次是清晰说话,在减轻口罩的过滤效应方面更有效。