Kowalski Christian, Boulesteix Anne-Laure, Harendza Sigrid
Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Department of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03495-4.
Guideline-based therapy of cardiac arrhythmias is important for many physicians from the beginning of their training. Practical training of the required skills to treat cardiac arrhythmias is useful for acquiring these skills but does not seem sufficient for skill retention. The aim of this study was to compare different retention methods for skills required to treat cardiac arrhythmias with respect to the performance of these skills in an assessment.
Seventy-one final-year medical students participated in a newly designed workshop to train synchronized cardioversion (SC) and transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) skills in 2020. All participants completed an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE 1) one week after the training. Afterwards, the participants were stratified and randomized into three groups. Nine weeks later, one group received a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the skills, one group participated in a second workshop (SW), and one group received no further intervention (control). Ten weeks after the first training, all groups participated in OSCE 2.
The average score of all students in OSCE 1 was 15.6 ± 0.8 points with no significant differences between the three groups. Students in the control group reached a significantly (p < 0.001) lower score in OSCE 2 (-2.0 points, CI: [-2.9;-1.1]) than in OSCE 1. Students in the SOP-group achieved on average the same result in OSCE 2 as in OSCE 1 (0 points, CI: [-0.63;+0.63]). Students who completed a second skills training (SW-group) scored not significantly higher in OSCE 2 compared to OSCE 1 (+0.4 points, CI: [-0.29;+1.12]). The OSCE 2 scores in groups SOP and SW were neither significantly different nor statistically equivalent.
Partial loss of SC and TCP skills acquired in a workshop can be prevented after 10 weeks by reading an SOP as well as by a second workshop one week before the second assessment. Refreshing practical skills with an SOP could provide an effective and inexpensive method for skills retention compared to repeating a training. Further studies need to show whether this effect also exists for other skills and how frequently an SOP should be re-read for appropriate long-term retention of complex skills.
从医学生培训伊始,基于指南的心律失常治疗对许多医生而言就很重要。心律失常治疗所需技能的实践培训有助于掌握这些技能,但似乎不足以维持技能水平。本研究旨在比较心律失常治疗所需技能的不同维持方法在评估中这些技能表现方面的差异。
71名医学专业最后一年的学生参加了2020年新设计的一个讲习班,以培训同步心脏复律(SC)和经皮心脏起搏(TCP)技能。所有参与者在培训一周后完成了客观结构化临床考试(OSCE 1)。之后,参与者被分层并随机分为三组。九周后,一组收到了这些技能的标准操作程序(SOP),一组参加了第二个讲习班(SW),一组未接受进一步干预(对照组)。第一次培训十周后,所有组都参加了OSCE 2。
所有学生在OSCE 1中的平均成绩为15.6±0.8分,三组之间无显著差异。对照组学生在OSCE 2中的成绩(-2.0分,CI:[-2.9;-1.1])比在OSCE 1中显著降低(p<0.001)。SOP组学生在OSCE 2中的平均成绩与在OSCE 1中相同(0分,CI:[-0.63;+0.63])。完成第二次技能培训的学生(SW组)在OSCE 2中的得分与OSCE 1相比没有显著提高(+0.4分,CI:[-0.29;+1.12])。SOP组和SW组的OSCE 2成绩既无显著差异,也无统计学等效性。
通过阅读SOP以及在第二次评估前一周参加第二个讲习班,可在10周后防止在讲习班中获得的SC和TCP技能部分丧失。与重复培训相比,用SOP复习实践技能可为维持技能提供一种有效且廉价的方法。进一步的研究需要表明这种效果是否也适用于其他技能,以及为长期适当地维持复杂技能,SOP应多久重读一次。