• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知情绪调节策略与人格障碍青少年临床样本治疗结果的关系。

Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in relation to treatment outcome in a clinical sample of adolescents with personality disorders.

机构信息

Parnassia Group: Youz, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, The Hague, Netherlands.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Curium-Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Nov;29(6):1897-1904. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2758. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1002/cpp.2758
PMID:35653420
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10084372/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine cognitive emotion regulation strategies (CERS) of help-seeking adolescents diagnosed with personality disorders. At pre-treatment, patients (N = 116) were found to use some maladaptive but also some adaptive CERS more often than adolescents from the general population. Less than 4% of these pre-treatment CERS predicted treatment outcome. In patients whose treatment outcome according to the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) showed significant improvement (N = 75), a reduction of maladaptive CERS and an increase of adaptive CERS occurred. Patients that were unchanged or deteriorated (N = 41) showed no significant changes in CERS. In conclusion, pre-treatment CERS are not predictive for treatment outcome in this sample of adolescents diagnosed with personality disorders. Even though patients who use more adaptive and less maladaptive CERS have fewer symptoms, the relationship between these CERS and symptoms in this group of severe patients remains unclear.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨求助青少年人格障碍患者的认知情绪调节策略(CERS)。在治疗前,患者(N=116)被发现比一般人群更频繁地使用一些适应不良但也有一些适应的 CERS。这些治疗前的 CERS 中,不到 4%预测了治疗效果。在根据症状清单-90(SCL-90)显示治疗效果显著改善的患者中(N=75),适应不良的 CERS 减少,适应的 CERS 增加。治疗无变化或恶化的患者(N=41)在 CERS 方面没有显著变化。总之,在这个被诊断为人格障碍的青少年样本中,治疗前的 CERS 并不能预测治疗效果。尽管使用更多适应性和更少适应不良的 CERS 的患者症状较少,但在这群严重患者中,这些 CERS 与症状之间的关系仍不清楚。

相似文献

1
Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in relation to treatment outcome in a clinical sample of adolescents with personality disorders.认知情绪调节策略与人格障碍青少年临床样本治疗结果的关系。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Nov;29(6):1897-1904. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2758. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
2
Childhood trauma and current depression among Chinese university students: a moderated mediation model of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and neuroticism.中国大学生童年创伤与当前抑郁:认知情绪调节策略和神经质的中介调节模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03673-6.
3
Emotional Disorders During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Spain: The Role of Sociodemographic Risk Factors and Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies.西班牙 COVID-19 爆发期间的情绪障碍:社会人口学风险因素和认知情绪调节策略的作用。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Aug;48(4):412-423. doi: 10.1177/10901981211014101. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
The mediating role of trait emotional intelligence in the relationship between parental neglect and cognitive emotion regulation strategies.特质情绪智力在父母忽视与认知情绪调节策略关系中的中介作用。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 30;12(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01817-3.
5
Global emotion dysregulation and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the effects of severe trauma on depressive and positive symptoms in early non-affective psychosis.全球情绪失调和适应不良的认知情绪调节策略中介了严重创伤对早期非情感性精神病的抑郁和阳性症状的影响。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Aug;222:251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.040. Epub 2020 May 27.
6
Worry about COVID-19 contagion and general anxiety: Moderation and mediation effects of cognitive emotion regulation.担心 COVID-19 传染和一般焦虑:认知情绪调节的调节和中介作用。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Cognitive emotion regulation and learning effectiveness in college students with ADHD symptoms.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍症状的大学生的认知情绪调节与学习效果
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2025 Jan;38(1):73-89. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2379986. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
8
Influence of Neuroticism on Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Adolescents: The Mediation Effects of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies.神经质对中国青少年抑郁症状的影响:认知情绪调节策略的中介作用
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 14;11:420. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00420. eCollection 2020.
9
Coping with stressful life events: Cognitive emotion regulation profiles and depressive symptoms in adolescents.应对生活压力事件:青少年的认知情绪调节特征与抑郁症状。
Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Aug;32(3):985-995. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000920.
10
Emotion regulation in adolescents with anorexia and bulimia nervosa: Differential use of adaptive and maladaptive strategies compared to healthy adolescents.神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症青少年的情绪调节:与健康青少年相比,适应性和不适应性策略的差异使用。
Int J Eat Disord. 2021 Dec;54(12):2206-2212. doi: 10.1002/eat.23608. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of emotional regulation outcomes in psychological interventions for youth with depression and anxiety.对针对抑郁和焦虑青少年的心理干预中情绪调节结果的元分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1443-1457. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01191-9. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
The role of affective control in emotion regulation during adolescence.情感控制在青少年情绪调节中的作用。
Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):80-86. doi: 10.1037/emo0000695.
3
Coping as a mediator between locus of control, competence beliefs, and mental health: A systematic review and structural equation modelling meta-analysis.应对作为控制源、能力信念和心理健康之间的中介:系统评价和结构方程模型荟萃分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Oct;121:103442. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103442. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
4
Mental illness and well-being: an affect regulation perspective.精神疾病与幸福感:情感调节视角
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):130-139. doi: 10.1002/wps.20618.
5
Non-suicidal Self-Injury in Clinical Practice.临床实践中的非自杀性自伤行为
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 7;10:502. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00502. eCollection 2019.
6
Adolescent attachment insecurity and the influence of MBT.青少年依恋不安全感与心理化基础疗法的影响
Attach Hum Dev. 2020 Apr;22(2):157-173. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2018.1529808. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
7
All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension.一荣俱荣,一损俱损:一维视角下的精神障碍。
Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;175(9):831-844. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17121383. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Examining changes in personality disorder and symptomology in an adolescent sample receiving intensive mentalization based treatment: a pilot study.在接受强化心智化治疗的青少年样本中研究人格障碍和症状学的变化:一项试点研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017 Nov 28;11:58. doi: 10.1186/s13034-017-0197-9. eCollection 2017.
9
Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: A systematic review.情绪调节作为一种跨诊断治疗结构,涵盖焦虑、抑郁、物质使用、饮食和边缘型人格障碍:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Nov;57:141-163. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review.应对方式、情绪调节与儿童及青少年时期的精神病理学:一项元分析和叙述性综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):939-991. doi: 10.1037/bul0000110. Epub 2017 Jun 15.