• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pandemic preparedness means policy makers need to work with social scientists.

作者信息

Pickersgill Martyn, Manda-Taylor Lucinda, Niño-Machado Natalia

机构信息

Usher Institute, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.

Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.

出版信息

Lancet. 2022 Aug 20;400(10352):547-549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00983-7. Epub 2022 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00983-7
PMID:35654080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9150864/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cff/9150864/e2207ac39f7c/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cff/9150864/e2207ac39f7c/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cff/9150864/e2207ac39f7c/fx1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Pandemic preparedness means policy makers need to work with social scientists.大流行防范意味着政策制定者需要与社会科学家合作。
Lancet. 2022 Aug 20;400(10352):547-549. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00983-7. Epub 2022 May 30.
2
About courageous scientists, responsible policy makers, bridge-builders and preparedness for the next influenza pandemic.关于勇敢的科学家、负责任的政策制定者、桥梁搭建者以及对下一次流感大流行的防范。
Vaccine. 2012 Dec 7;30(51):7437-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.073.
3
Scientists and policy makers gathered in the post H1N1 pandemic period at the Fourth ESWI Influenza Conference.在甲型H1N1流感大流行之后的时期，科学家和政策制定者齐聚第四届欧洲卫生系统与政策观察站流感会议。
Vaccine. 2012 Dec 7;30(51):7343. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.072. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
4
Policy perspectives on post pandemic influenza vaccination in Ghana and Malawi.加纳和马拉维大流行后流感疫苗接种的政策观点
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 28;17(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4058-5.
5
Public Health Policy and Experience of the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic in Pune, India.印度浦那市 2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行的公共卫生政策和经验。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):154-166. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.54.
6
Pandemic (H1N1 influenza 2009 and Australian emergency departments: implications for policy, practice and pandemic preparedness.大流行（H1N1 流感 2009 年和澳大利亚急诊科：对政策、实践和大流行准备的影响）
Emerg Med Australas. 2012 Apr;24(2):159-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01519.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
7
[A review on the preparedness plans on influenza pandemics, by WHO and China: the current status and development].[世界卫生组织与中国关于流感大流行防范计划的综述：现状与发展]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 10;39(8):1032-1035. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.08.004.
8
Development of a resource modelling tool to support decision makers in pandemic influenza preparedness: The AsiaFluCap Simulator.开发资源建模工具以支持大流行性流感防范决策制定者：亚洲流感能力建设模拟工具。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 12;12:870. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-870.
9
Pandemic planning and response in academic pediatric emergency departments during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间，学术型儿科急诊部门的大流行规划和应对。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/acem.12061.
10
Factors affecting preparedness and capacity to manage pandemic influenza: perceptions of healthcare managers.影响大流行性流感防范与应对能力的因素：医疗保健管理人员的看法
Public Health. 2014 Aug;128(8):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
"Backlash!"? A qualitative exploration of hospice palliative care staff's ongoing experiences of "living with covid".“强烈反对！”？对临终关怀姑息治疗工作人员“与新冠共存”的持续经历的质性探索。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 30;18:26323524241283064. doi: 10.1177/26323524241283064. eCollection 2024.
2
Sociologists in public health: marginal observers or mainstream collaborators?公共卫生领域的社会学家：边缘观察者还是主流合作者？
Perspect Public Health. 2024 Mar;144(2):72-74. doi: 10.1177/17579139231204245.
3
How and why to use 'vulnerability': an interdisciplinary analysis of disease risk, indeterminacy and normality.

本文引用的文献

1
Normal Island: COVID-19, Border Control, and Viral Nationalism in UK Public Health Discourse.《正常岛：英国公共卫生话语中的新冠疫情、边境管控与病毒民族主义》
Sociol Res Online. 2021 Nov 25;28(2):596-606. doi: 10.1177/13607804211049464. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Travel measures in the SARS-CoV-2 variant era need clear objectives.在新冠病毒变异株时代的旅行措施需要明确的目标。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 9;399(10333):1367-1369. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00366-X. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
The political theatre of the UK's travel ban on South Africa.英国对南非实施旅行禁令的政治闹剧。
如何以及为何使用“脆弱性”：对疾病风险、不确定性和常态的跨学科分析。
Med Humanit. 2024 Feb 22;50(1):125-134. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2023-012683.
4
Is mpox an STI? The societal aspects and healthcare implications of a key question.猴痘是性传播感染吗？一个关键问题的社会层面及医疗影响。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Jul 4;7:252. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18436.2. eCollection 2022.
5
Pandemic delay: social implications and challenges for palliative care.大流行导致的延误：姑息治疗的社会影响与挑战
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Mar 21;17:26323524231159146. doi: 10.1177/26323524231159146. eCollection 2023.
6
Protecting mental health in quarantine: Exploring lived experiences of healthcare in mandatory COVID-19 quarantine, New South Wales, Australia.在隔离期间保护心理健康：探索澳大利亚新南威尔士州COVID-19强制隔离中医疗保健的实际经历。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Mar;21:101329. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101329. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
7
Uneven stigma loads: Community interpretations of public health policies, 'evidence' and inequities in shaping Covid-19 stigma in Vietnam.不均衡的污名负担：越南社区对公共卫生政策、“证据”以及塑造新冠疫情污名化过程中不平等现象的解读
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Dec;20:101270. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101270. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
8
Rapid qualitative health research from the Global South: Reflections and learnings from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic.来自全球南方的快速定性健康研究：新冠疫情期间阿根廷、巴西、智利和墨西哥的反思与经验教训
Front Sociol. 2022 Sep 28;7:983303. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.983303. eCollection 2022.
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2211-2213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02752-5. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Follow *the* science? On the marginal role of the social sciences in the COVID-19 pandemic.遵循科学？论社会科学在新冠疫情中的边缘作用。
Eur J Philos Sci. 2021;11(4):99. doi: 10.1007/s13194-021-00416-y. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
5
'Who cares if you're poz right now?': Barebackers, HIV and COVID-19.“现在你感染了又怎样？”：无保护性行为者、HIV 和 COVID-19。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Nov;43(9):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13369. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: an expert consultation.欧洲新冠疫情的未来展望：一次专家咨询
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Sep;8:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100185. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Expertise from the humanities and social sciences is essential for governmental responses to COVID-19.人文社会科学方面的专业知识对于政府应对新冠疫情至关重要。
J Glob Health. 2021 Jun 30;11:03081. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.03081.
8
Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.在冠状病毒（COVID-19）大流行期间实施的（最多 12 周）远程医疗堕胎服务中妇女的体验：定性评估。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1752-1761. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16813. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
"If a rabbi did say 'you have to vaccinate,' we wouldn't": Unveiling the secular logics of religious exemption and opposition to vaccination.“如果拉比说‘你必须接种疫苗’，我们就不会这样做了”：揭示宗教豁免和反对接种疫苗的世俗逻辑。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;280:114052. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114052. Epub 2021 May 21.
10
Critical care work during COVID-19: a qualitative study of staff experiences in the UK.新冠疫情期间的重症监护工作：英国工作人员经验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 18;11(5):e048124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048124.