• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术对食管癌患者术后肺功能影响的荟萃分析。

The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 3;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8
PMID:35655256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9164493/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on postoperative pulmonary function in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Studies about the influence of MIE and OE on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, CBM, and Wanfang Data from inception to March 18, 2021. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

This analysis included eight studies, enrolling 264 patients who underwent MIE and 257 patients who underwent OE. The meta-analysis results showed that the MIE group had a higher outcome regarding the percent predicted vital capacity (%VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV), and maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) 1 month after surgery than the OE group. In addition, those who underwent MIE had lower ΔVC%, ΔFVC, and ΔFEV between pre-operation and 1 month after surgery than those who underwent OE. There is no statistical difference between the two groups in ΔMVV.

CONCLUSION

Compared with OE, MIE has a more protective effect on postoperative pulmonary function. However, due to the small number of included literature and all cohort studies, this finding needs to be validated with larger samples and higher quality RCT studies.

摘要

目的

比较微创食管切除术(MIE)和开放食管切除术(OE)对食管癌患者术后肺功能的影响。

方法

从 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、中国知网、中国科技期刊数据库、CBM 和万方数据中检索了从建库到 2021 年 3 月 18 日有关 MIE 和 OE 对食管癌患者术后肺功能影响的研究。使用 RevMan 5.3 进行 Meta 分析。

结果

本分析纳入了 8 项研究,共纳入 264 例接受 MIE 和 257 例接受 OE 的患者。Meta 分析结果显示,MIE 组术后 1 个月时预测肺活量百分比(%VC)、用力肺活量(FVC)、1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV)和最大自主通气量(MVV)的结果更高。此外,与 OE 组相比,MIE 组患者术后 1 个月时的 VC%、FVC%和 FEV%下降幅度更小。两组间 MVV 的ΔMVV 无统计学差异。

结论

与 OE 相比,MIE 对术后肺功能具有更好的保护作用。然而,由于纳入文献数量较少且均为队列研究,该结论需要更大样本量和更高质量的 RCT 研究来验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/a7d9a23ebd7e/13019_2022_1824_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/71feba036a6e/13019_2022_1824_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/a3ac1d7ea704/13019_2022_1824_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/791b0b1d8c31/13019_2022_1824_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/5f88996007c4/13019_2022_1824_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/581a80943a8b/13019_2022_1824_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/451e82ef3165/13019_2022_1824_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/37b823798a30/13019_2022_1824_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/9e696959628a/13019_2022_1824_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/a7d9a23ebd7e/13019_2022_1824_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/71feba036a6e/13019_2022_1824_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/a3ac1d7ea704/13019_2022_1824_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/791b0b1d8c31/13019_2022_1824_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/5f88996007c4/13019_2022_1824_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/581a80943a8b/13019_2022_1824_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/451e82ef3165/13019_2022_1824_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/37b823798a30/13019_2022_1824_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/9e696959628a/13019_2022_1824_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db74/9164493/a7d9a23ebd7e/13019_2022_1824_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy on postoperative pulmonary function in esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术对食管癌患者术后肺功能影响的荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jun 3;17(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01824-8.
2
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.食管癌颈部吻合术的微创与开放食管切除术比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3.
3
The influence of minimally invasive esophagectomy on wound infection in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.微创食管切除术对食管癌手术患者伤口感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14598. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14598.
4
Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.单一癌症中心食管癌微创与开放食管切除术的比较研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(4):747-52.
5
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.利用日本全国性数据库对开放式与微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期结局进行比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1821-1827. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.微创食管切除术在局部晚期食管癌中的短期和长期结果优于开放食管切除术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;31(9):5748-5756. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15596-z. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
7
Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.机器人辅助和传统的微创食管切除术与杂交和开胸经胸食管切除术相比,具有更好的术后结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Apr;48(4):776-782. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.121. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
8
Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis.微创食管癌根治术后与开放性食管癌根治术的主要术后并发症比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:554-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
9
Minimally Invasive Open Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer or Cancer of the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-term Survival Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.微创经左胸入路 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术或胃食管结合部癌切除术:采用倾向评分匹配分析比较术后结果和长期生存。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jul;41(7):3499-3510. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15137.
10
Postoperative short-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.微创手术与开放手术治疗食管癌患者的术后短期结局:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jun;11(6):1465-1475. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13413. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the clinical effect of inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer: a comparative study.充气纵隔镜同步腹腔镜根治性切除食管癌的临床效果评估:一项对比研究
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 15;30(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02550-2.
2
Clinical implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的临床应用。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02641-7.
3
Laparoscopic versus open abdominal lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Morbidity and Mortality of Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗后与新辅助化疗后行微创食管切除术的局部晚期食管鳞癌患者的发病率和死亡率:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 May 1;156(5):444-451. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0133.
2
Precautions for avoiding pulmonary morbidity after esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后避免肺部并发症的注意事项。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Jun 8;4(5):480-484. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12354. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Long-Term Trends in Respiratory Function After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
腹腔镜与开腹淋巴结清扫术治疗食管鳞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Today. 2024 Dec;54(12):1445-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02874-2. Epub 2024 May 21.
食管癌手术后呼吸功能的长期趋势。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:168-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.040. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
4
Effect of lymph node examined count on accurate staging and survival of resected esophageal cancer.淋巴结检出数对食管癌根治术后准确分期和生存的影响。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 May;10(5):1149-1157. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13056. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
5
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Minimally invasive esophagectomy may contribute to long-term respiratory function after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.微创食管切除术可能有助于食管癌患者行食管切除术后的长期呼吸功能。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jun 1;31(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/dox153.
7
Worldwide incidence, mortality and time trends for cancer of the oesophagus.全球食管癌的发病率、死亡率及时间趋势。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017 Mar;26(2):107-118. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000249.
8
Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis.胸腔镜与杂交食管切除术的早期结果:倾向评分匹配的比较分析
Surgery. 2016 Apr;159(4):1073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Muscle sparing thoracotomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison with posterolateral thoracotomy.食管癌的保留肌肉开胸术:与后外侧开胸术的比较
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):807-14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1240-1. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
Clinical analysis of acute lung injury after esophagectomy.食管癌切除术后急性肺损伤的临床分析
J Cancer Res Ther. 2014 Dec;10 Suppl:314-8. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.151541.