Occhipinti Giovanni, Nascimento Daniel L, Foscato Marco, Fogg Deryn E, Jensen Vidar R
Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen Allégaten 41 N-5007 Bergen Norway
Center for Catalysis Research & Innovation, Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa Ottawa Canada K1N 6N5
Chem Sci. 2022 Mar 22;13(18):5107-5117. doi: 10.1039/d2sc00855f. eCollection 2022 May 11.
Ruthenium-cyclic(alkyl)(amino)carbene (CAAC) catalysts, used at ppm levels, can enable dramatically higher productivities in olefin metathesis than their N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) predecessors. A key reason is the reduced susceptibility of the metallacyclobutane (MCB) intermediate to decomposition β-H elimination. The factors responsible for promoting or inhibiting β-H elimination are explored density functional theory (DFT) calculations, in metathesis of ethylene or styrene (a representative 1-olefin) by Ru-CAAC and Ru-NHC catalysts. Natural bond orbital analysis of the frontier orbitals confirms the greater strength of the orbital interactions for the CAAC species, and the consequent increase in the carbene trans influence and trans effect. The higher trans effect of the CAAC ligands inhibits β-H elimination by destabilizing the transition state (TS) for decomposition, in which an agostic MCB C-H bond is positioned trans to the carbene. Unproductive cycling with ethylene is also curbed, because ethylene is trans to the carbene ligand in the square pyramidal TS for ethylene metathesis. In contrast, metathesis of styrene proceeds a 'late' TS with approximately trigonal bipyramidal geometry, in which carbene trans effects are reduced. Importantly, however, the positive impact of a strong trans-effect ligand in limiting β-H elimination is offset by its potent accelerating effect on bimolecular coupling, a major competing means of catalyst decomposition. These two decomposition pathways, known for decades to limit productivity in olefin metathesis, are revealed as distinct, antinomic, responses to a single underlying phenomenon. Reconciling these opposing effects emerges as a clear priority for design of robust, high-performing catalysts.
钌-环(烷基)(氨基)卡宾(CAAC)催化剂在百万分之一的用量水平下,相比其N-杂环卡宾(NHC)前身,能在烯烃复分解反应中实现显著更高的生产率。一个关键原因是金属环丁烷(MCB)中间体对分解(β-H消除)的敏感性降低。通过密度泛函理论(DFT)计算,研究了Ru-CAAC和Ru-NHC催化剂在乙烯或苯乙烯(一种代表性的1-烯烃)复分解反应中促进或抑制β-H消除的因素。前线轨道的自然键轨道分析证实了CAAC物种的轨道相互作用更强,从而导致卡宾的反位影响和反位效应增加。CAAC配体更高的反位效应通过使分解的过渡态(TS)不稳定来抑制β-H消除,在该过渡态中,一个键合的MCB C-H键与卡宾处于反位。与乙烯的无生产性循环也受到抑制,因为在乙烯复分解反应的方锥过渡态中,乙烯与卡宾配体处于反位。相比之下,苯乙烯的复分解反应通过具有近似三角双锥几何形状的“后期”过渡态进行,其中卡宾的反位效应降低。然而,重要的是,强反位效应配体在限制β-H消除方面的积极影响被其对双分子偶联(催化剂分解的一种主要竞争方式)的强大加速作用所抵消。这两种分解途径,几十年来已知会限制烯烃复分解反应的生产率,被揭示为对单一潜在现象的不同的、相互矛盾的反应。调和这些相反的效应成为设计稳健、高性能催化剂的明确优先事项。