Ahn Hyunmin, Jun Ikhyun, Seo Kyoung Yul, Kim Eung Kweon, Kim Tae-Im
Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Corneal Dystrophy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 17;9:871382. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.871382. eCollection 2022.
To investigate an artificial intelligence (AI) model performance using multi-source anterior segment optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images in estimating the preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with senile cataract.
Retrospective, cross-instrument validation study.
A total of 2,332 anterior segment images obtained using swept-source OCT, optical biometry for intraocular lens calculation, and a femtosecond laser platform in patients with senile cataract and postoperative BCVA ≥ 0.0 logMAR were included in the training/validation dataset. A total of 1,002 images obtained using optical biometry and another femtosecond laser platform in patients who underwent cataract surgery in 2021 were used for the test dataset.
AI modeling was based on an ensemble model of Inception-v4 and ResNet. The BCVA training/validation dataset was used for model training. The model performance was evaluated using the test dataset. Analysis of absolute error (AE) was performed by comparing the difference between true preoperative BCVA and estimated preoperative BCVA, as ≥0.1 logMAR (AE) or <0.1 logMAR (AE ). AE was classified into underestimation and overestimation groups based on the logMAR scale.
Mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean percentage error (MPE), and correlation coefficient between true preoperative BCVA and estimated preoperative BCVA.
The test dataset MAE, RMSE, and MPE were 0.050 ± 0.130 logMAR, 0.140 ± 0.134 logMAR, and 1.3 ± 13.9%, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.969 ( < 0.001). The percentage of cases with AE was 8.4%. The incidence of postoperative BCVA > 0.1 was 21.4% in the AE group, of which 88.9% were in the underestimation group. The incidence of vision-impairing disease in the underestimation group was 95.7%. Preoperative corneal astigmatism and lens thickness were higher, and nucleus cataract was more severe ( < 0.001, 0.007, and 0.024, respectively) in AE than that in AE . The longer the axial length and the more severe the cortical/posterior subcapsular opacity, the better the estimated BCVA than the true BCVA.
The AI model achieved high-level visual acuity estimation in patients with senile cataract. This quantification method encompassed both visual acuity and cataract severity of OCT image, which are the main indications for cataract surgery, showing the potential to objectively evaluate cataract severity.
研究一种人工智能(AI)模型利用多源眼前节光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像估计老年性白内障患者术前最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的性能。
回顾性、跨仪器验证研究。
将使用扫频源OCT、用于人工晶状体计算的光学生物测量法以及飞秒激光平台获取的2332例老年性白内障患者且术后BCVA≥0.0 logMAR的眼前节图像纳入训练/验证数据集。将2021年接受白内障手术患者使用光学生物测量法和另一个飞秒激光平台获取的1002例图像用于测试数据集。
AI建模基于Inception-v4和ResNet的集成模型。BCVA训练/验证数据集用于模型训练。使用测试数据集评估模型性能。通过比较术前真实BCVA与估计术前BCVA之间的差异进行绝对误差(AE)分析,差异≥0.1 logMAR(AE)或<0.1 logMAR(AE)。根据logMAR量表将AE分为低估组和高估组。
术前真实BCVA与估计术前BCVA之间的平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均百分比误差(MPE)和相关系数。
测试数据集的MAE、RMSE和MPE分别为0.050±0.130 logMAR、0.140±0.134 logMAR和1.3±13.9%。相关系数为0.969(<0.001)。AE病例的百分比为8.4%。AE组术后BCVA>0.1的发生率为2l.4%,其中88.9%在低估组。低估组视力损害疾病的发生率为95.7%。AE组术前角膜散光和晶状体厚度更高,核性白内障更严重(分别为<0.001、0.007和0.024)。眼轴长度越长,皮质/后囊下混浊越严重,估计的BCVA比真实BCVA越好。
AI模型在老年性白内障患者中实现了高水平的视力估计。这种量化方法涵盖了OCT图像的视力和白内障严重程度,而这两者是白内障手术的主要指征,显示了客观评估白内障严重程度的潜力。