• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机械通气重症患者的量子意识指数与里士满躁动镇静量表的比较:一项观察性研究。

Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.

作者信息

Harsha Makam S, Bhatia Pradeep K, Sharma Ankur, Sethi Priyanka

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Trauma and Emergency (Anesthesia), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):491-495. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183.

DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183
PMID:35656063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9067479/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2-5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5-2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and -3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score.

RESULTS

A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021).

CONCLUSION

qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

CTRI/2019/07/020064.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.

摘要

背景

量子意识指数(qCON)是一种基于脑电图(EEG)的指标,目前尚无关于重症监护病房(ICU)镇静的研究,尽管仅有极少研究描述了其在手术室中用于评估麻醉深度的情况。在本研究中,我们在ICU中对使用机械通气的患者,评估了qCON与里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)相比在评估镇静方面的效果。

材料与方法

在12小时内对87名年龄在18至60岁之间使用机械通气的患者进行了调查。给予他们标准化剂量的镇静药物,包括单次静脉注射异丙酚0.5mg/kg和芬太尼1μg/kg,然后持续输注异丙酚2 - 5mg/(kg·小时)和芬太尼0.5 - 2μg/(kg·小时)。调整这些药物输注量以使RASS评分在0至 - 3之间。使用qCON监测仪,研究人员记录qCON值,然后评估RASS评分。

结果

共获得1218次读数。将每个qCON值与对应的每个RASS值随时间进行对比后,我们发现它们之间的相关性具有统计学意义(ρ = 0.288,P < 0.0001)。借助受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,我们能够区分合适与不合适的镇静水平。qCON值为80时,灵敏度为72.67%,特异度为67.42%(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.738,标准误[SE]为0.021)。

结论

qCON可用于评估使用机械通气的危重症患者的镇静水平。

临床试验注册号

CTRI/2019/07/020064。

如何引用本文

Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. 机械通气危重症患者中量子意识指数与里士满躁动镇静量表的比较:一项观察性研究。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2022;26(4):491 - 495。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.机械通气重症患者的量子意识指数与里士满躁动镇静量表的比较:一项观察性研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):491-495. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183.
2
Entropy correlates with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.熵与机械通气危重症患者的里士满躁动-镇静量表相关。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Apr;28(2):193-201. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9517-7.
3
Bispectral index correlates well with Richmond agitation sedation scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.脑电双频指数与机械通气危重症患者的 Richmond 躁动-镇静评分相关性良好。
J Anesth. 2010 Jun;24(3):394-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0915-4. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
4
Quantium Consciousness Index and Quantium Noxious Index in Ketamine Subdose Administration Compared with Fentanyl and Midazolam in Postoperative ICU Patients: A Prospective, Observational Study.氯胺酮亚剂量给药与芬太尼和咪达唑仑相比在术后重症监护病房患者中的量子意识指数和量子毒性指数:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun;28(6):581-586. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24734.
5
Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.临床镇静评分作为重症监护病房患者镇静和镇痛药物暴露的指标。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):218-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.005.
6
Bispectral Index Can Reliably Detect Deep Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Validation Study.脑电双频指数能够可靠地检测机械通气患者的深度镇静:一项前瞻性多中心验证研究。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jul;125(1):176-183. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001786.
7
The correlation between the Richmond agitation-sedation scale and bispectral index during dexmedetomidine sedation.右美托咪定镇静期间里士满躁动镇静量表与脑电双频指数的相关性
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Apr;23(4):300-4. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000081. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
8
Assesment of correlation between bispectral index and four common sedation scales used in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU.评估脑电双频指数与 ICU 机械通气患者中常用的四种镇静评分量表之间的相关性。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 May;16(5):660-6.
9
Comparison and agreement between the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale in evaluating patients' eligibility for delirium assessment in the ICU.比较 Richmond 躁动-镇静量表和 Riker 镇静-躁动量表在评估 ICU 患者谵妄评估资格方面的一致性。
Chest. 2012 Jul;142(1):48-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2100.
10
Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) in critically ill children.里士满躁动-镇静量表(RASS)在危重症儿童中的效度
J Intensive Care. 2016 Oct 26;4:65. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0189-5. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
What Every Intensivist Should Know About Remimazolam.每位重症监护医生都应了解的关于瑞马唑仑的知识。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun;29(6):531-533. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24993. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Sedation Vacations in Neurocritical Care: Friend or Foe?神经危重症监护中的镇静休假:是敌是友?
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Dec;24(12):671-680. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01383-6. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Quantium Consciousness Index and Quantium Noxious Index in Ketamine Subdose Administration Compared with Fentanyl and Midazolam in Postoperative ICU Patients: A Prospective, Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of neuromuscular blockade on the bispectral index in critically ill patients.神经肌肉阻滞对危重症患者脑电双频指数的影响。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;93(4):251-256. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2019.07.003. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
Effects of daily sedation interruption in intensive care unit patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机械通气重症监护病房患者每日镇静中断的效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):e12948. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12948. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
3
Age influences on Propofol estimated brain concentration and entropy during maintenance and at return of consciousness during total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion in unparalyzed patients: An observational prospective trial.
氯胺酮亚剂量给药与芬太尼和咪达唑仑相比在术后重症监护病房患者中的量子意识指数和量子毒性指数:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun;28(6):581-586. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24734.
年龄对靶控输注全静脉麻醉中未麻痹患者维持期和意识恢复时异丙酚估算脑浓度和熵的影响:一项观察性前瞻性试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0244145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244145. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparison of the Conox (qCON) and Sedline (PSI) depth of anaesthesia indices to predict the hypnotic effect during desflurane general anaesthesia with ketamine.康诺(qCON)和赛德林(PSI)麻醉深度指数对比预测氯胺酮复合全身麻醉时地氟醚的催眠效应。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Dec;35(6):1421-1428. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00619-3. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
5
A pilot study of high frequency accelerometry-based sedation and agitation monitoring in critically ill patients.一项基于高频加速度计的危重症患者镇静与躁动监测的初步研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2020 Sep;22(3):245-252. doi: 10.1016/S1441-2772(23)00392-7.
6
Awareness and bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in mechanically ventilated patients in the emergency department and intensive care unit: a systematic review protocol.急诊科和重症监护病房机械通气患者的意识和双频谱指数(BIS)监测:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e034673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034673.
7
A comparative study on adequate anesthesia depth: clinical judgement and the Narcotrend® measurement.足够麻醉深度的对比研究:临床判断与 Narcotrend® 监测。
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;67(6):664-673. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01602-x. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Time delay of the qCON monitor and its performance during state transitions.qCON 监测器的时间延迟及其在状态转换期间的性能。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):379-386. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00480-4. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
[The correlation among the Ramsay sedation scale, Richmond agitation sedation scale and Riker sedation agitation scale during midazolam-remifentanil sedation].[咪达唑仑-瑞芬太尼镇静期间 Ramsay 镇静评分、Richmond 躁动镇静评分与 Riker 镇静躁动评分之间的相关性]
Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;67(4):347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Monitoring depth of sedation: evaluating the agreement between the Bispectral Index, qCON and the Entropy Module's State Entropy during flexible bronchoscopy.监测镇静深度:在柔性支气管镜检查期间评估脑电双频指数、qCON 与熵指数模块状态熵之间的一致性。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2017 Jun;83(6):563-573. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11262-9. Epub 2017 Feb 8.