• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用格拉斯哥猫科综合疼痛量表进行有效的评估是否需要进行培训?

Is training necessary for efficacious use of the Glasgow Feline Composite Measure Pain Scale?

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, USA (Moody); Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (Niel); Department of Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (Pang); Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada (Pang).

出版信息

Can Vet J. 2022 Jun;63(6):609-616.

PMID:35656525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9112359/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Glasgow Feline Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-F) is a validated cat pain assessment tool for clinical use. No research has examined how training impacts use of this tool. Thus, we examined whether seminar-style training improves the identification of cat pain when using the CMPS-F. Veterinarians ( = 17) and non-veterinarian staff ( = 33; N = 50) were recruited to participate.

PROCEDURE

Seminars included: i) pre-training use of the CMPS-F to score cat videos with varying degrees of pain; ii) cat pain assessment training; and iii) post-training use of the CMPS-F. Participant CMPS-F ratings were compared to experts' ratings of the same videos. Average CMPS-F scores and analgesic decision ratings were compared pre-and post-training.

RESULTS

Most participants were female non-veterinarian staff who had not heard of the CMPS-F. Participant and expert analgesic decision-making did not differ pre- ( = 1.0) and post-training ( = 0.1). In addition, analgesic decision-making was similar between participants and experts for all but 3/20 videos.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Seminar training may not be necessary for efficacious use of the CMPS-F. Further research is needed to explore strategies for improving awareness of cat pain assessment tools and increasing in-clinic use.

摘要

目的

格拉斯哥猫综合疼痛量表(CMPS-F)是一种经过验证的用于临床的猫疼痛评估工具。目前还没有研究探讨培训对使用该工具的影响。因此,我们研究了研讨会式培训是否能提高使用 CMPS-F 识别猫疼痛的能力。我们招募了兽医(n=17)和非兽医工作人员(n=33;共 50 人)参与研究。

过程

研讨会包括:i)在培训前使用 CMPS-F 对不同疼痛程度的猫视频进行评分;ii)猫疼痛评估培训;iii)在培训后使用 CMPS-F。将参与者的 CMPS-F 评分与专家对同一视频的评分进行比较。比较培训前后的平均 CMPS-F 评分和镇痛决策评分。

结果

大多数参与者为女性非兽医工作人员,之前没有听说过 CMPS-F。培训前后,参与者和专家的镇痛决策并无差异(分别为 1.0 和 0.1)。此外,除了 20 个视频中的 3 个之外,对于所有视频,参与者和专家的镇痛决策相似。

结论和临床相关性

研讨会培训可能不是使用 CMPS-F 进行有效治疗所必需的。需要进一步研究以探索提高对猫疼痛评估工具的认识和增加临床使用的策略。

相似文献

1
Is training necessary for efficacious use of the Glasgow Feline Composite Measure Pain Scale?使用格拉斯哥猫科综合疼痛量表进行有效的评估是否需要进行培训?
Can Vet J. 2022 Jun;63(6):609-616.
2
Use of mechanical thresholds in a model of feline clinical acute pain and their correlation with the Glasgow Feline Composite Measure Pain Scale scores.在猫科动物临床急性疼痛模型中使用机械阈值及其与格拉斯哥猫科动物综合疼痛量表评分的相关性。
J Feline Med Surg. 2022 Jun;24(6):517-523. doi: 10.1177/1098612X211035051. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Development of a behaviour-based measurement tool with defined intervention level for assessing acute pain in cats.开发一种具有明确干预水平的基于行为的测量工具,用于评估猫的急性疼痛。
J Small Anim Pract. 2014 Dec;55(12):622-9. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12280.
4
Attitudes to acute pain and the use of pain assessment scales among Spanish small animal veterinarians.西班牙小动物兽医对急性疼痛的态度及疼痛评估量表的使用情况
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Dec 18;10:1302528. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1302528. eCollection 2023.
5
Investigating the effect of anxiety on pain scores in dogs.探讨焦虑对犬疼痛评分的影响。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2022 Jan;49(1):135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
6
Applicability, reproducibility, and reliability of the German version of the Glasgow composite measured pain scale - feline during implementation into a small animal clinic.德国版格拉斯哥复合疼痛量表-猫在小型动物诊所实施中的适用性、可重复性和可靠性。
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2024 Feb;52(1):17-24. doi: 10.1055/a-2229-3039. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
7
Analgesia: What Makes Cats Different/Challenging and What Is Critical for Cats?镇痛:猫有何不同/具有挑战性之处以及对猫而言什么至关重要?
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2020 Jul;50(4):749-767. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Clinical validation of the short and long UNESP-Botucatu scales for feline pain assessment.用于猫疼痛评估的短版和长版UNESP-博图卡图量表的临床验证
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 12;9:e11225. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11225. eCollection 2021.
9
The influence of demeanor on scores from two validated feline pain assessment scales during the perioperative period.围手术期猫的行为表现对两种经验证的猫疼痛评估量表评分的影响。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 May;44(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.09.001. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
10
The analgesic effects of buprenorphine (Vetergesic or Simbadol) in cats undergoing dental extractions: A randomized, blinded, clinical trial.布比卡因(Vetergesic 或 Simbadol)在猫拔牙中镇痛效果的随机、盲法、临床试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 6;15(3):e0230079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230079. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Bovine pain scale: A novel tool for pain assessment in cattle undergoing surgery in the hospital setting.牛疼痛量表:一种用于评估在医院环境中接受手术的牛的疼痛的新型工具。
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0323710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323710. eCollection 2025.
2
Less experienced observers assess piglet castration-induced acute pain differently than experienced observers: A pilot study.经验较少的观察者对仔猪去势引起的急性疼痛的评估与经验丰富的观察者不同:一项初步研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 4;19(9):e0309684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309684. eCollection 2024.
3
Inter-observer reliability of three feline pain scales used in clinical practice.三种临床常用猫科动物疼痛量表的观察者间信度。
J Feline Med Surg. 2023 Sep;25(9):1098612X231194423. doi: 10.1177/1098612X231194423.

本文引用的文献

1
The development and use of facial grimace scales for pain measurement in animals.用于动物疼痛测量的面部表情量表的开发与应用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Sep;116:480-493. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Clinical applicability of the Feline Grimace Scale: real-time versus image scoring and the influence of sedation and surgery.猫科动物痛苦表情量表的临床适用性:实时评分与图像评分以及镇静和手术的影响
PeerJ. 2020 Apr 14;8:e8967. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8967. eCollection 2020.
3
Facial expressions of pain in cats: the development and validation of a Feline Grimace Scale.猫的疼痛面部表情:猫痛苦表情评分量表的制定与验证。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 13;9(1):19128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55693-8.
4
Influence of Rater Training on Inter- and Intrarater Reliability When Using the Rat Grimace Scale.评分者培训对使用大鼠面部表情量表时的评分者间信度和评分者内信度的影响。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;58(2):178-183. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000044. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Professionals underestimate patients' pain: a comprehensive review.专业人员低估了患者的疼痛:综合述评。
Pain. 2018 May;159(5):811-818. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001165.
6
Evaluation of interobserver agreement for postoperative pain and sedation assessment in cats.猫术后疼痛和镇静评估中观察者间一致性的评估
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;251(5):544-551. doi: 10.2460/javma.251.5.544.
7
The lack of analgesic use (oligoanalgesia) in small animal practice.小动物临床中镇痛药物使用不足(镇痛药物使用过少)的情况。
J Small Anim Pract. 2017 Oct;58(10):543-554. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12717. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
The influence of demeanor on scores from two validated feline pain assessment scales during the perioperative period.围手术期猫的行为表现对两种经验证的猫疼痛评估量表评分的影响。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 May;44(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.09.001. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
9
Definitive Glasgow acute pain scale for cats: validation and intervention level.猫的格拉斯哥急性疼痛量表:验证与干预水平
Vet Rec. 2017 May 6;180(18):449. doi: 10.1136/vr.104208. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
10
Real-time application of the Rat Grimace Scale as a welfare refinement in laboratory rats.实时应用大鼠面部表情评分系统作为实验室大鼠福利优化的手段。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 17;6:31667. doi: 10.1038/srep31667.