• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印象形成刺激:一个基于道德、能力、信息量和可信度对行为陈述进行评级的语料库。

Impression formation stimuli: A corpus of behavior statements rated on morality, competence, informativeness, and believability.

机构信息

School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269393. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269393
PMID:35657992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165857/
Abstract

To investigate impression formation, researchers tend to rely on statements that describe a person's behavior (e.g., "Alex ridicules people behind their backs"). These statements are presented to participants who then rate their impressions of the person. However, a corpus of behavior statements is costly to generate, and pre-existing corpora may be outdated and might not measure the dimension(s) of interest. The present study makes available a normed corpus of 160 contemporary behavior statements that were rated on 4 dimensions relevant to impression formation: morality, competence, informativeness, and believability. In addition, we show that the different dimensions are non-independent, exhibiting a range of linear and non-linear relationships, which may present a problem for past research. However, researchers interested in impression formation can control for these relationships (e.g., statistically) using the present corpus of behavior statements.

摘要

为了研究印象形成,研究人员往往依赖于描述一个人行为的陈述(例如,“亚历克斯在背后嘲笑别人”)。这些陈述被呈现给参与者,然后让他们对这个人的印象进行评价。然而,一组行为陈述的生成成本很高,而且预先存在的语料库可能已经过时,并且可能无法衡量感兴趣的维度。本研究提供了一个规范的 160 个当代行为陈述的语料库,这些陈述在与印象形成相关的 4 个维度上进行了评价:道德、能力、信息量和可信度。此外,我们还表明,不同的维度不是独立的,它们之间存在着一系列线性和非线性关系,这可能是过去研究中的一个问题。然而,对印象形成感兴趣的研究人员可以使用本行为陈述语料库来控制这些关系(例如,通过统计方法)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/50f0f8d49637/pone.0269393.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/73ebff80f611/pone.0269393.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/a500556bb028/pone.0269393.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/50f0f8d49637/pone.0269393.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/73ebff80f611/pone.0269393.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/a500556bb028/pone.0269393.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/011c/9165857/50f0f8d49637/pone.0269393.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impression formation stimuli: A corpus of behavior statements rated on morality, competence, informativeness, and believability.印象形成刺激:一个基于道德、能力、信息量和可信度对行为陈述进行评级的语料库。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269393. eCollection 2022.
2
Are talented people more virtuous in the eyes of others? Positive effects of competence on perceived morality.有才能的人在别人眼中更有道德吗?能力对感知道德的积极影响。
Psych J. 2022 Aug;11(4):560-570. doi: 10.1002/pchj.541. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Perceptions of artificial intelligence system's aptitude to judge morality and competence amidst the rise of Chatbots.在聊天机器人兴起的背景下,对人工智能系统判断道德和能力的资质的认知。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jul 18;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00573-7.
4
You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation.你想给人留下好印象?那就诚实吧!道德特质主导着群体印象的形成。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):149-66. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
5
When It's Bad to Be Friendly and Smart: The Desirability of Sociability and Competence Depends on Morality.友善且聪明有时并非好事:社交能力与能力的可取性取决于道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1272-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167216655984. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
6
Morality or competence? The importance of affirming the appropriate dimension of self-integrity.道德还是能力?肯定自我完整性适当维度的重要性。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;21(4):956-972. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12209.
7
Religion and the morality of mentality.宗教与心理的道德性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;81(4):697-710.
8
You are fair, but I expect you to also behave unfairly: Positive asymmetry in trait-behavior relations for moderate morality information.你是公正的,但我期望你也表现出不公正:适度道德信息的特质-行为关系中的正向不对称性。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 11;12(7):e0180686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180686. eCollection 2017.
9
Facial appearance affects science communication.面部外观会影响科学传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):5970-5975. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620542114. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Unconstrained Descriptions of Facebook Profile Pictures Support High-Dimensional Models of Impression Formation.对脸书个人资料图片的无约束描述支持印象形成的高维模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul 30:1461672241266651. doi: 10.1177/01461672241266651.

引用本文的文献

1
Did he or didn't he? Mixed evidence for the continued influence of retracted misinformation on person impressions.他到底有没有?关于撤回的错误信息对人物印象持续影响的混合证据。
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322045. eCollection 2025.
2
AI language model rivals expert ethicist in perceived moral expertise.在被感知的道德专业知识方面,人工智能语言模型可与专家伦理学家相媲美。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 3;15(1):4084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86510-0.
3
Perceptions of artificial intelligence system's aptitude to judge morality and competence amidst the rise of Chatbots.

本文引用的文献

1
Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization.雨云图:一种用于稳健数据可视化的多平台工具。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Jan 21;4:63. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2. eCollection 2019.
2
Believability of evidence matters for correcting social impressions.证据的可信度对于纠正社会印象很重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9802-9807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903222116. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure.刻板印象内容:温暖与能力持久不变。
在聊天机器人兴起的背景下,对人工智能系统判断道德和能力的资质的认知。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jul 18;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00573-7.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;27(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0963721417738825. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
4
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
5
Unethical and inept? The influence of moral information on perceptions of competence.不道德且不熟练?道德信息对能力认知的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Feb;114(2):195-210. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000097.
6
He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations.他做了什么?诊断性在修正内隐评价中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jan;108(1):37-57. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000014. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
7
Diagnostic value underlies asymmetric updating of impressions in the morality and ability domains.印象在道德和能力领域的不对称更新以诊断价值为基础。
J Neurosci. 2013 Dec 11;33(50):19406-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2334-13.2013.
8
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.道德品质在人际知觉和评价中占主导地位。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jan;106(1):148-68. doi: 10.1037/a0034726. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Surveying the moral landscape: moral motives and group-based moralities.审视道德景观:道德动机与基于群体的道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Aug;17(3):219-36. doi: 10.1177/1088868313480274. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
10
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.道德心理学是关系调节:统一、等级、平等和相称的道德动机。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):57-75. doi: 10.1037/a0021867.