Lawrence W, Donegan W L, Natarajan N, Mettlin C, Beart R, Winchester D
Ann Surg. 1987 Apr;205(4):349-59. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198704000-00003.
A nationwide survey of the clinical presentation, pathology, and management of soft tissue sarcomas in adults was carried out under the auspices of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons. Two separate 2-year periods were used to allow assessment of changes in patterns of care. Data were obtained from 504 hospitals in 1977-1978 (2355 patients) and 645 institutions in 1983-1984 (3457 patients). Pretreatment findings of interest included some evidence of physician delay in diagnosis, overuse of excisional biopsy as opposed to the generally preferred approach of incisional biopsy, a low rate of usage of the American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging (AJCSS) system, and major reliance on CT for pretreatment patient evaluation. Operation was the primary treatment, with or without adjuvant therapies, in approximately three fourths of the patients. The other one fourth were primarily patients with distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Some increase in multimodal therapy did occur in the second period but the rate of amputation was low (approximately 10%) in both periods studied. Survival curves support the prognostic validity of the AJCCS system and the value of complete resection of soft tissue sarcomas. Adverse prognostic factors included positive surgical margins, large tumors, retroperitoneal or mediastinal primary sites, some histologic types, and the perceived need for adjuvant therapy. Patients receiving adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy had less favorable survival data than those treated by operation alone due to criteria used for selecting patients for these therapies. Approximately one half of the treatment failures in the 1977-1978 series were locoregional, whereas 18% were limited to lung metastasis. Salvage therapy for these two forms of treatment failure yielded 61% and 21% 5-year survival rates.
在美国外科医师学会癌症委员会的支持下,开展了一项关于成人软组织肉瘤临床表现、病理及治疗的全国性调查。采用了两个独立的两年期来评估治疗模式的变化。数据来自1977 - 1978年的504家医院(2355例患者)以及1983 - 1984年的645家机构(3457例患者)。感兴趣的治疗前发现包括医师诊断延迟的一些证据、与通常更可取的切开活检方法相比,切除活检的过度使用、美国癌症联合委员会分期系统(AJCSS)的低使用率,以及在治疗前患者评估中主要依赖CT。手术是大约四分之三患者的主要治疗方法,无论是否进行辅助治疗。另外四分之一主要是诊断时已有远处转移的患者。在第二个时期确实出现了多模式治疗的一些增加,但在两个研究时期截肢率都很低(约10%)。生存曲线支持AJCCS系统的预后有效性以及软组织肉瘤完整切除的价值。不良预后因素包括手术切缘阳性、肿瘤较大、腹膜后或纵隔原发部位、某些组织学类型,以及认为需要辅助治疗。由于选择接受这些治疗的患者所采用的标准,接受辅助放疗或化疗的患者生存数据不如仅接受手术治疗的患者。在1977 - 1978年系列中,约一半的治疗失败是局部区域的,而18%仅限于肺转移。针对这两种治疗失败形式的挽救性治疗的5年生存率分别为61%和21%。