Dündar-Coecke Selma
Centre for Educational Neuroscience, Department of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Quantum Brain Art - QBA, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:692552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.692552. eCollection 2022.
To what extent general intelligence mechanisms are associated with causal thinking is unclear. There has been little work done experimentally to determine which developing cognitive capacities help to integrate causal knowledge into explicit systems. To investigate this neglected aspect of development, 138 children aged 5-11 studying at mainstream primary schools completed a battery of three intelligence tests: one investigating verbal ability (WASI vocabulary), another looking at verbal analogical (Verbal Analogies subset of the WRIT), and a third assessing non-verbal/fluid reasoning (WASI block design). Children were also interviewed over the course of three causal tasks (sinking, absorption, and solution), with the results showing that the developmental paths exhibited uneven profiles across the three causal phenomena. Children consistently found that explaining solution, where substances disappeared toward the end of the process, was more challenging. The confirmatory factor analyses suggested that the impact of cognitive ability factor in explicitly identifying causal relations was large. The proportion of the direct effect of general intelligence was 66% and it subsumed the variances of both verbal measures. Of this, 37% was the indirect effect of age. Fluid reasoning explained a further 28% of the variance, playing a unique role in causal explanation. The results suggested that, overall, cognitive abilities are substantially related to causal reasoning, but not entirely due to developmental differences in "" during the age periods studied.
一般智力机制与因果思维在多大程度上相关尚不清楚。在实验方面,几乎没有开展工作来确定哪些发展中的认知能力有助于将因果知识整合到显性系统中。为了研究这一被忽视的发展方面,138名就读于主流小学的5至11岁儿童完成了一系列三项智力测试:一项测试言语能力(韦氏成人智力量表词汇量测试),另一项测试言语类比(WRIT中的言语类比子集),第三项评估非言语/流体推理(韦氏成人智力量表积木设计测试)。此外,还对儿童进行了三项因果任务(下沉、吸收和溶解)的访谈,结果表明,在这三种因果现象中,发展路径呈现出不均衡的特征。儿童一致发现,解释溶解现象(即物质在过程结束时消失)更具挑战性。验证性因素分析表明,认知能力因素在明确识别因果关系方面的影响很大。一般智力的直接效应比例为66%,它包含了两种言语测量的方差。其中,37%是年龄的间接效应。流体推理进一步解释了28%的方差,在因果解释中发挥了独特作用。结果表明,总体而言,认知能力与因果推理密切相关,但并不完全归因于所研究年龄阶段“”的发展差异。